Less crime, safer communities, fewer people in prison

March 9, 2010 2:09 pm

Prison

By Stephen Gummer

The Howard League for Penal Reform‘s latest campaign, Take Action 2010, is launching with the 2010 general election in mind. Prison numbers have more than doubled since the mid-1990s and yet crime remains a major public concern. We believe now is the time to campaign for a change in direction and encourage people to embrace our vision of “less crime, safer communities, fewer people in prison”.

The principle aim of our campaign is to get the public and Prospective Parliamentary Candidates during the general election to accept that there is something seriously wrong with the English and Welsh penal system.

When two thirds of our prison population get out of jail and reoffend, we question whether prison is making Britain’s families safer. When 70% of the people locked up in England and Wales have two or more mental health disorders, we question whether doing nothing is the right option. And when our country treats children as young as ten as if they were criminally responsible adults, we question the very nature of our modern society.

As part of Take Action 2010 we have published an alternative manifesto. The campaign targets four of our core policy areas: investing in the community rather than prisons; ending ineffective short prison terms; improving the treatment of children in the penal system; and implementing a regime of real work for long term prisoners.

Frances Crook, director of the Howard League, writes in her foreword to the Take Action 2010 manifesto:

“Billions of pounds are spent on maintaining our prisons and building thousands of new prison places each year. Instead of tackling the underlying causes of crime by investing in communities and prevention, we spend ever-increasing sums on simply trying to manage the problem. In our flooding house, we spend our money on endless mops when we could look to fix the hole in the roof.”

At the coming election, voters will be asking serious questions about how government money is spent. They should also be asking serious questions about the way we deal with continually high reoffending rates in this country and how their local candidate plans to keep their local community safe. The Howard League for Penal Reform is not an abolitionist society, but has come up with realistic proposals rooted in pragmatic experience from the frontline.

We believe the Howard League’s election manifesto should be on the compulsory reading list of all PPCS as it takes an original approach to a policy area which matters to everyone: the safety of their local community.

We would like as many people as possible to sign up to the Howard League campaign slogan of “less crime safer communities and fewer people in prison” this election. You can join Lady Sovereign, Prunella Scales and Lindsay Lohan and sign up to the Take Action 2010 campaign pledge. We are asking people to spread the message of our campaign as widely as possible. This means that we want you to tell your friends and your local parliamentary candidates about the campaign, and why it’s important.

Related posts:

  1. Why I believe keeping Ronald Biggs in prison is wrong
  2. I’ve only recently thought about how crime affects me
  3. While the Tories row over crime and justice, Labour are showing real results
  4. “Profoundly misleading” Tory crime stats – 8 in the morning, February 4th
  5. Chris Grayling: opportunism, scaremongering, political positioning and youth crime gimmicks at Comment is Free

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →