The budget is a crossroads for Britain and for Labour

March 19, 2010 10:19 am

Darling Budget 09

By Jeremy Corbyn / @JeremyCorbyn

Tuesday’s papers led with the interesting story that the EU is concerned that Britain will be unable to lower its debt to the required 3% of GDP by 2014. This casts aspersions on the strategy of the government before next week’s budget – indeed a veiled threat was made at the weekend by the head of Japanese bank Nomura that a hung parliament would lead to the devaluation of the pound.

And as if to add to the growing right-wing consensus that public spending cuts should pay for the bankers’ recession, the media are emphasising the effect of enormous cuts already made in Greece and then telling President George Papandreou he hasn’t done enough.

The “new” Tories justify their planned savage cuts in public spending on the basis that the huge borrowing required to buy out the banks has to be repaid by cutting public expenditure and thus rapidly increasing unemployment for both the people cut and subsequently for anyone they used to buy goods from.

The approach taken by the government during the banking crisis of 2008 was a mixed one. In part it was the product of a process of financial deregulation stretching back to Thatcher’s “big bang” of 1982 and Gordon Brown’s decade – long pursuit of financial deregulation.

His response of taking controlling shares in all of the major banks when the crisis began was a correct one, but there Brown’s interventionism ended.

Instead of converting the major banks into fully publicly owned companies, the shareholding was transferred to a holding company, the sole function of which is to dispose of the shares as quickly as possible.

On the Politics Show last Sunday Gordon Brown claimed that every penny loaned to the banks would be repaid by them. Meanwhile, the manifesto for the general election is being written and Alistair Darling is putting the finishing touches to next week’s budget.

As well as bring a crossroads for Britain, this is also a huge crossroads for Labour. Any politician seriously proposing to reduce British borrowing to the levels now required by the EU in less than three years ought to look to Greece, and the political and public reaction to the slashing of wages, services and jobs.

The new Labour strategy of limited financial regulation, the contracting out of services and the reluctance to raise thresholds for the richest in society has left the gap between the rich and the poor as wide as ever.

Welcome as the government’s anti-poverty measures have been, all of this is clearly at risk if we move into huge job losses, tax increases, and an advancing recession. More than ever, the arguments for intervention and socialism are the most relevant.

This is an abridged version of Jeremy’s weekly column in the Morning Star.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →