The budget is a crossroads for Britain and for Labour

March 19, 2010 10:19 am

Darling Budget 09

By Jeremy Corbyn / @JeremyCorbyn

Tuesday’s papers led with the interesting story that the EU is concerned that Britain will be unable to lower its debt to the required 3% of GDP by 2014. This casts aspersions on the strategy of the government before next week’s budget – indeed a veiled threat was made at the weekend by the head of Japanese bank Nomura that a hung parliament would lead to the devaluation of the pound.

And as if to add to the growing right-wing consensus that public spending cuts should pay for the bankers’ recession, the media are emphasising the effect of enormous cuts already made in Greece and then telling President George Papandreou he hasn’t done enough.

The “new” Tories justify their planned savage cuts in public spending on the basis that the huge borrowing required to buy out the banks has to be repaid by cutting public expenditure and thus rapidly increasing unemployment for both the people cut and subsequently for anyone they used to buy goods from.

The approach taken by the government during the banking crisis of 2008 was a mixed one. In part it was the product of a process of financial deregulation stretching back to Thatcher’s “big bang” of 1982 and Gordon Brown’s decade – long pursuit of financial deregulation.

His response of taking controlling shares in all of the major banks when the crisis began was a correct one, but there Brown’s interventionism ended.

Instead of converting the major banks into fully publicly owned companies, the shareholding was transferred to a holding company, the sole function of which is to dispose of the shares as quickly as possible.

On the Politics Show last Sunday Gordon Brown claimed that every penny loaned to the banks would be repaid by them. Meanwhile, the manifesto for the general election is being written and Alistair Darling is putting the finishing touches to next week’s budget.

As well as bring a crossroads for Britain, this is also a huge crossroads for Labour. Any politician seriously proposing to reduce British borrowing to the levels now required by the EU in less than three years ought to look to Greece, and the political and public reaction to the slashing of wages, services and jobs.

The new Labour strategy of limited financial regulation, the contracting out of services and the reluctance to raise thresholds for the richest in society has left the gap between the rich and the poor as wide as ever.

Welcome as the government’s anti-poverty measures have been, all of this is clearly at risk if we move into huge job losses, tax increases, and an advancing recession. More than ever, the arguments for intervention and socialism are the most relevant.

This is an abridged version of Jeremy’s weekly column in the Morning Star.

Related posts:

  1. Labour AMs will vote against Johnson’s police cuts budget
  2. The Tories are the party of unemployment – but Labour offers a positive future for young Britain
  3. Was this the Labour Budget for the global age?
  4. The government says Cameron’s approach to the downturn is to talk Britain down
  5. Anti-semitism is alive and well in Britain – how Labour should fight it

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →