In defence of prevent

April 1, 2010 12:51 am

Faith Matters

By Iman Abou-Atta

Last night I read with some dismay that the government strategy ‘Preventing Violent Extremism’, or ‘Prevent‘ as it is also known, has come under fire from a parliamentary committee. The committee published a report which seeks an independent investigation into how the scheme is perceived by the communities it is intended for.

Many witnesses who came before the committee felt the Prevent agenda had been used to spy on Muslim communities. This couldn’t be further from the truth. The nature of our work at Faith Matters is incredibly sensitive, and so our approach to the work must be too. Much energy is spent ensuring that we work at the heart of the communities vulnerable to violent extremist messages. We build relationships and create an environment in which they can and do trust us. So I find it unhelpful when there is a suggestion that organisations like ours are in some way “spying” on the very communities we seek to help.

It is also important to note that Prevent doesn’t only deal with Muslim communities but it also works on extremist elements which exist in other areas including the far right.

As a result of this, a deep rooted ‘victim mentality’ can and has been created in certain communities where people feel threatened and/or alienated. In addition, they have become distrustful of one another. The Prevent agenda, however, has done two things very well. First, it has supported the organic development of a young leadership within Muslim communities in the UK; second, it has encouraged up-and-coming female leaders in Muslim communities to become active and has given them a platform to play constructive and leading roles. This investment has made a difference and the positive impacts will be felt across Britain.

It is true that from its inception in 2005 following the London tube bombings, Prevent has been a controversial programme. Its purpose, however, is simple: to work with young people who are vulnerable to violent extremist elements.

The strategy is designed to prevent such elements from gaining momentum and to work with vulnerable individuals and their communities to resist supporting these violent movements. Faith Matters has worked on a number of Prevent projects around the country, raising awareness of key pastoral support roles, for example. We have worked with chaplains in institutions who support the vulnerable people we have been describing.

There is also an important role to be played by elected members and faith leaders in this area, and Faith Matters has trained these people in selected communities on the Prevent agenda and community cohesion. Their involvement and support is exceptionally important because their elevated presence as elected members can and does make a difference at community level.

One element that is a reoccurring problem -which our work has sought to address – is to correct the perception in wider communities that conflate Islam and Muslims with Al Qaeda and terrorism, which are, of course, completely separate elements. Projects such as these have been instrumental in ensuring these communities continue to be engaged with wider elements of society.

When John Denham took on the role of secretary of state for communities and local government he wasted no time in rebutting criticisms of the Prevent agenda. He delivered a new plan of action and his message was clear: the programme had to have a much broader appeal, and must reach deep into the heart of communities affected.

This does not mean to “spy” on potential extremists or to carry out “intelligence gathering exercises” with certain groups, as the committee suggests, but to work with, and help, all those who could be affected.

At the heart of this is a need to protect society, break down boundaries and distrust and build cohesive communities. And that is at the forefront of everything we do.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →