Tory cuts to Crossrail would be a disaster – only Labour will make the right investment for London

April 16, 2010 2:27 pm

CrossrailBy Ken Livingstone

The Conservatives’ confirmation that it is possible that Crossrail may be cancelled under a Cameron government is dynamite for London politics.

On the ITV debate last night Gordon Brown was right to say that when private investment has collapsed in the way we have seen then public spending and investment must be protected. Crossrail is an example of a project that not only maintains public investment but will reap huge rewards for our economy. It will add 10% to London’s transport capacity, create 14,000 jobs in the construction period alone and add an estimated £20billion to London’s economy. This in turn will bring huge benefit to the British economy and to the public finances. It is not a small matter.

The Tories are in an almighty mess because they will not give a clear commitment to deliver it – and now their Shadow London Minister has confirmed that it is possible they may scrap it. “I can’t give a guarantee that it will continue,” she told Nick Ferrari on LBC 97.3 yesterday.

It is an extraordinary state of affairs that any political party could go into this election without a clear position on Crossrail. But on Crossrail Cameron and Osborne have been engaged in chicanery.

They used a mealy-mouthed formulation in their manifesto that merely said they ‘support’ Crossrail, without any clarity about when, how and on what route.

The underlying, real, Conservative position has been bubbling away for some considerable time.

Shadow Transport Secretary Theresa Villiers confirmed in February that Crossrail will be up for review under a Tory government, saying that “any project will have to come under review after the election. I would say the Crossrail project will be included in that review as well.”

Going back further, the London Evening Standard’s political editor Joe Murphy reported last July that Shadow Chancellor George Osborne was reserving the right to “go over the plans” for Crossrail and was refusing to give an unequivocal commitment that it will go ahead to the same budget and timetable as currently planned.

The Standard declared at the time:

“It bodes ill for London, then, that the [Conservative] party is refusing to guarantee funding for Crossrail, the long-delayed rail-link between Heathrow and Stratford. They should think again…”

The Tory manifesto commitment of just three words, none of them a commitment to complete the project on the same route, budget and timetable as planned, was the latest instalment of this exercise in trying to hoodwink London.

Trickery of this kind can collapse like a house of cards in the right circumstances – which is what happened when Nick Ferrari pressed Justine Greening yesterday on LBC. Justine Greening has said publicly and on the record what was implicit in the Tory position for months.

Any review of the financing could endanger the whole project by delaying it or re-opening settled debates. But even short of that the Tories may also be preparing to get their axes out and start chopping whole parts of the route out of the existing plans.

It is unreasonable to refuse to say where you stand on an infrastructure project of this scale and importance. Voters are entitled to know before polling day.

Justine Greening says the party cannot commit until after the election:

“I’m an accountant and I know I could never write a budget for a company I had not started work in.”

This is pure nonsense. The Tories have had no trouble giving other commitments – such as an inheritance tax cut for the richest estates in the country.

It shows with perfect clarity the choice on offer. Whereas the Tories say it is possible that Crossrail will be cancelled, Labour promises “We will complete the new east-west Crossrail line in London adding 10% to London transport capacity.”

We saw in last night’s TV debate that when pressed over spending – such as on policing or schools – or over NHS guarantees, Cameron has no convincing answer. A policy of investing, not cutting, is the right way forward for London.

Related posts:

  1. Greening: It’s possible the Tories could scrap Crossrail
  2. Tory policy on Europe could lead to disaster for Britain
  3. Fairer taxation, support for families, investment: A great foundation for a new Labour term
  4. Nothing beats the personal touch: why organisation is key for London Young Labour
  5. The secret documents that reveal Tory plans for social cleansing of the poor in West London

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →
  • News NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    There’s some devastating YouGov polling on NHS “reform” for Cameron to digest today. Firstly, the public are firmly against his reforms. Almost half (48%) of the public oppose the reforms, compared to just 18% who back them. But it’s not just the broad idea of the reforms that the public oppose – it’s the specifics. On the question of whether increasing competition in the NHS will improve health services (something which Labour were not against in principle in office), the [...]

    Read more →