A view from the NEC – and the two options for the leadership timetable

May 16, 2010 6:05 pm

By Ann Black

Truly a week is a long time in politics. Thanks for all the comments so far – I’m still analysing them, but overall the mood is positive, with national results better than the doomsters predicted and hundreds of council seats gained. Thousands of people have joined or rejoined Labour since the election, so please welcome them to your local parties.

The NEC has been trying to keep up. Last Tuesday we discussed mechanisms for safeguarding Labour’s programme in any arrangement with the Lib Dems. We agreed to trust our negotiators, but as in my feedback, serious concerns were expressed. These were not primarily tribal in nature, but based on practicalities. The two parties together would have no majority, giving the tiny nationalist groups protectionist vetoes. And a coalition of the parties which had lost seats, with a second prime minister unelected by the British people, would have been criticised as lacking legitimacy and punished by the voters if it fell apart.

Later that day the talks came to nothing anyway, and the Cameron-Clegg team took power. Gordon Brown resigned as Prime Minister and as party leader, and many of you have praised his dignity, his statesmanship, his courage and his service over many years.

We now move to choosing his successor, and on Tuesday this week (May 18th) the NEC will agree a timetable. There are two main options, and I’d like to know which you prefer:

Option A: hustings meetings and a ballot of all members and affiliated trade unionists during June/July, with the new leader announced at a special conference at the end of July.

Option B: hustings in June/July, followed by a ballot in August/September, with the new leader announced at the annual conference in September, two weeks before parliament returns.

(Please email me at annblack50@btinternet.com with your preference. If you’ve already emailed me about this, there’s no need to write again.)

In either case the NEC is expected to waive the six-month membership requirement, as for the 2007 deputy contest, so that new members will be able to vote immediately.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →