How Labour lost (and how we might lose again)

May 24, 2010 1:10 pm

By Declan Gaffney

The idea that Labour’s election defeat was due to the sudden desertion of the party by skilled working class voters – known as ‘C2’s in the jargon of market research – has gained widespread currency, reflected in the convergence of most of the candidates for the leadership around certain themes: notably immigration and welfare reform.

As Liam Byrne put it in a Progress pamphlet published on Friday:

“These voters are the bedrock of our coalition. But their support for Labour has fallen off a cliff. In 2005, 43% of C2’s were Labour. Now Mori say it’s down 20%, to just 23%.”

How accurate is this picture? Estimates released by Mori on Friday allow us to compare Labour’s vote share among different social groups since 1997 on a consistent basis. While this sort of analysis is not an exact science, and different methodologies will yield different results, these are the best estimates we have to go on at the moment, and they tell a more complex story.

On these figures, Labour’s vote share among the ‘C2′ demographic did fall in 2010, but by 11 percentage points, rather than 20 (see chart, below).*

Declan Chart

Secondly, on Mori’s figures, the fall in the C2 vote share in 2010 was nothing new. In 2005, Labour’s share in this group fell by 9 percentage points. This suggests that Labour’s problem with the C2 demographic is longer term in nature than the narrative offered by Liam Byrne indicates.

Thirdly, Labour lost vote share across all these demographics in 2005 and 2010. While the fall among C2’s is proportionally greatest, it looks like part of a broader pattern.

Fourthly, consider what has happened to Labour’s share of the lower income DE demographic since 1997. In 1997, Labour had 59% of votes in this group; by 2010, this was down to 40%. Liam Byrne’s pamphlet virtually ignores this group, which is no less important in terms of Labour’s share of the national popular vote than the C2’s. (Lower turnout among DE’s is offset by the greater size of the group.)

These figures do not, on the face of it, support the sort of post-election narrative offered by Progress or the leadership candidates so far. They suggest that Labour’s electoral problems are longer term in nature and more widely spread across social groups.

Much of the post-election debate has been couched in terms of how to win back the C2 vote. But there is little reason to think that task can be accomplished by focussing on this demographic in isolation. Meanwhile, there is another question which nobody seems to be asking. How did Labour, with its highly redistributionary policies, manage to lose nearly a third of its vote share among the lowest income demographic while in government?

There will be no simple answer to that question, but the very invisibility of this group in Labour’s post-election narrative points to one line of explanation. Labour’s political strategy has long been concentrated on maintaining what was seen as the winning coalition of C2’s and more affluent voters of 1997. For many in the party, the most persuasive argument for this approach lay in the progressive policies Labour pursued in power, which directly benefited lower income groups. But the political strategy meant that voters in these groups were not an important target of Labour’s political messaging. Could it be that many lower income voters stopped supporting a party which often spoke about them but rarely addressed itself to them?

*The difference is easily explained. The figure cited in the Progress pamphlet used an earlier estimate by Mori produced just after the election, which gave Labour a lower share of the C2 vote for 2010, and combined it with an estimate of Labour’s 2005 share from a different source, which gave Labour a higher share than Mori.

Source for graph: Ipsos-Mori ‘How Britain voted’ 1997, 2001, 2005, 2010′

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Labour must do more to be a technologically literate party

    Labour must do more to be a technologically literate party

    To know what was going on at the Labour Party Conference you consulted the very pretty and professional conference app. If you preferred things the old fashioned way, then you could look up fringe events and exhibitors in the thick booklet that was handed out.  However if you wanted to search a pdf copy of the booklet for a keyword, or lookup information on the web, then you were out of luck entirely. The stage at the Labour Party Conference […]

    Read more →
  • News Who is the mystery person paying for private polling on Cameron’s holiday plans?

    Who is the mystery person paying for private polling on Cameron’s holiday plans?

    Recently, I was sent some screenshots of an online survey – conducted over the summer – on unfolding events in the Middle East. It appeared to be an attempt to gauge how the British public felt about the government’s handling of ISIS, and what should happen next. There were questions on whether and how Britain should intervene, and on how different international institutions/world leaders (including the Prime Minister) were handling the crisis. One question in particular leapt out though, which […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour will tackle “diversity deficit” in business boardrooms

    Labour will tackle “diversity deficit” in business boardrooms

    Chuka Umunna, the Shadow Business Secretary, will today announce plans to introduce legislation that requires businesses to release information on the racial make up of their workforce, in an effort to improve the number of people from ethnic minority backgrounds in boardrooms. Building on reforms that would make similar requirements of companies about their gender diversity, today’s announcement comes after it was revealed that over half FTSE 100 companies have no non-white directors whatsoever. Umunna said: “At the top of […]

    Read more →
  • Featured 5 thing I’ve learned at Tory conference (so far)

    5 thing I’ve learned at Tory conference (so far)

    I’m almost 24 hours in to my first Tory conference, which is a strange experience for a Labour-supporting blogger. It’s a little like being a Cold War era spy (blending into the background, nodding a lot at things you don’t understand), except the Tory Party know I’m here and I’m wearing a big name badge that says “LabourList”. Here are five things I’ve learned so far: 1. Cheery resignation: If last week’s Labour conference was a bit flat, this week’s […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured How the Labour leadership misunderstand two of their biggest problems

    How the Labour leadership misunderstand two of their biggest problems

    Even before Ed Miliband entered the stage last Tuesday afternoon to give his conference speech, a few of us knew there would be no big surprise. A source close to the leader had earlier told a group of assembled journalists and activists that they wanted to focus on the “big six” national goals, not a surprise that would grab all the attention. Understandably, the assembled audience came out disappointed. The media, who needed a fresh story since the six goals […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y