Let’s cut the nomination threshold and ensure we have a broad contest

May 21, 2010 1:39 pm

Tom Harris

By Duncan Hall / @doktordunc

Everybody says they want this Labour leadership contest to be a broad one; to be one that properly reflects the diversity of our great movement and broad church. David Miliband tweeted “more the merrier“, Ed Miliband says he wants the “broadest possible choice“, Ed Balls says he wants “a good choice of candidates” where “everyone” can “promote ideas and put their case”. I read that Alistair Darling praises the fact there is a broad range of candidates. John McDonnell and Diane Abbott are saying much the same thing. Such unity is rare and beautiful!

But, unfortunately, our current system, with its nomination hurdle of 12.5% means that it is unlikley that all six candidates will progress from here, let alone allow any further candidates to put themselves forward. This is especially the case if any of the front-runners go far beyond the required 33 nominations, as they are perfectly entitled to do. Of course, Milibands might be persuaded to “redistribute” their supporters in favour of the broad contest everyone wants – that can be done. But it might be a more straight-forward approach, and one that would be better understood in the country and the party, if we merely decided to waive the 12.5% nomination threshold in favour of something more generally attainable, such as 5%.

Tom Harris MP tweeted about this yesterday, asking who was with him. I re-tweeted and was not alone in doing so.

There is a simplicity in such a move. And there appears to be a precedent for making a temporary rule change for the contest. After all, the rule is that people must have been members for six months before they can vote in a leadership or deputy leadership election. The NEC rightly waived this rule for this contest and the 2007 one. As such, there should be no difficulty in making a similar temporary decision about this contest. The party can consider whether a more permanent rule change is necessary or desirable in its own leisure at a later date. Today we don’t need to debate the general principle, merely what will work for this contest.

So who’s in? Let’s give the party members the choice they really want. Let’s have the broad range of candidates that all the candidates themselves say they want. Let’s show the country the broad range of talent we have in the Labour Party, and show the country how democratic, mature and comradely we can be. This is an enormously important contest: let’s make it a good one.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Featured I Agree with Jack, End EU Elections

    I Agree with Jack, End EU Elections

    I agree with Jack Straw. EU parliamentary elections should be abolished. It’s not that we object to democracy, it’s that we object to failed democracy. We object to democracy that continues to exist as a pointless halfway-house absorbing considerable revenue without delivering anything in return. “The directly elected European parliament should be abolished after failing to achieve its purpose of bridging the divide between the European people and the European Union” is what Jack actually said at the recent IPPR event. [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Why are we losing police officers? asks MP

    Why are we losing police officers? asks MP

    Mp Clive Betts put Cameron on the spot over policing at PMQs, but do his arguments on “visible policing” really stack up? Watch their exchange and see for yourself:

    Read more →
  • News Gordon Brown slams Greek bailout – and warns Europe over austerity

    Gordon Brown slams Greek bailout – and warns Europe over austerity

    In an article for the Washington Post entitled “Europe’s shortsighted response to a worsening fiscal reality“, Gordon Brown has hit out at German-led austerity in Europe, lambasting: “policies that the whole world can see have already failed.” In fact, Brown goes further still in tackling head on the central argument around austerity – that any failings that arise from austerity are because there isn’t enough austerity: “the unfolding tragedy of a bankrupt Greece is only a symptom of an even [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured PMQs verdict: How could anyone have “won” something as dreadful as that?

    PMQs verdict: How could anyone have “won” something as dreadful as that?

    So much of the coverage of PMQs is focussed on the snap verdict. Who won? Who lost? I’m aware that this blog is as guilty as anyone for playing that game. So let’s make this one simple – nobody won today. How could they have, when the event itself was so deeply, stunningly, mind bendingly dreadful. It started off relatively normal. Loud admittedly, but normal. Ed began with the NHS. Still normal. Cameron dodged the question. Still supremely normal. But something [...]

    Read more →
  • News David Davis launches a scathing attack on the government’s close relationship with big business

    David Davis launches a scathing attack on the government’s close relationship with big business

    David Davis has launched a broadside against the PM – and especially the government’s relationship with big business (or “crony capitalism” as he calls it) – in an interview with Prospect Magazine. The former leadership challenger (who lost out to Cameron in 2005) has spoken out against the government’s handling of Hester’s RBS bonus, tax avoidance and the media. Interestingly, the quotes have come to light on the same day as fellow Tory right big hitter Liam Fox returns to the [...]

    Read more →