Why I fear this Alternative Vote proposal is another gerrymander

18th May, 2010 10:47 am

Ballot Vote

By Stephen Newton

I’ve been a supporter of comprehensive constitutional reform – not just the voting system – since the 1983 election, when I was 14. Back then the Conservatives won less than 34,000 votes for each elected MP, Labour won more than 40,000 for each MP and the Liberal/SDP Alliance more than 338,000 votes for each MP. It somehow took nearly ten times as many voters to elect a Liberal as a Tory and Thatcher had an unassailable Commons majority of 144 with a minority of the vote.

I was disgusted and a few years later became a founder member of the Liberal Democrats, only to leave in the late 1990s as the Manchester party plotted to undermine that city’s Commonwealth Games with fabricated stories to scare people off Labour.

Yet while I still yearn for a more proportional electoral system, I am not convinced I can vote for the Alternative Vote in the upcoming referendum and I’m shocked the Lib Dems asked Labour to introduce it without a referendum.

The Alternative Vote is not a system of proportional representation. It will generate more Lib Dem MPs, but is very unlikely to support smaller parties (check out the Electoral Reform Society projections). That’s because to win an AV election, you really need to come first or second on first preferences. The Greens, for example, tend to come third or fourth and would be eliminated early on. They could get 10-15% of the popular vote and have no more MPs under the Alternative Vote.

Given its flaws, the Alternative Vote is not even Liberal Democrat policy. While their statements on voting systems have been increasingly vague in recent years, preferring ambiguous calls for ‘fair votes’, they have always supported the Single Transferable Vote (STV) and multi-member constituencies. This is also the favoured system of the Electoral Reform Society and all the other leading campaign groups.

So when the Jenkins Commission into electoral reform failed to back STV in 1998 it was a surprise that took the wind out of the reform movement’s sails. Crucially, Jenkins did not recommend AV, but AV+ whereby parliament would be topped up with MPs from under represented parties. This idea, which would probably create additional Green and a couple of UKIP MPs, is not in the Lib Con proposal.

It gets worse. The coalition has also adopted the Tory idea of reducing the number of constituencies in Scotland, Wales and the inner cities (where Cameron has failed to win support). That is to say, the coalition appears only to support reforms that suit members of the coalition.

Set this in the context of the 55% lock in. This rushed legislation, that even the most prominent supporters admit transfers power to the monarchy, tries to stabilise the coalition by making Cameron virtually unsackable. Far from the much hyped reforming hung parliament, this is quickly emerging as a gerrymandering Lib Con.

The coalition says we have five years to the next election, but won’t take the time to offer the country a new constitutional settlement of which we can all be proud.

Supporters of real liberal democracy need to stand up and say no to partial reforms that suit narrow party interests much more than they suit any democratic agenda. Say no to this obscene gerrymandering in the name of liberal democracy. Say yes making Britain a world beacon for liberal democracy.

Latest

  • Comment Featured Uncategorized The left needs a more convincing agenda on immigration if it is to chart a route back to power

    The left needs a more convincing agenda on immigration if it is to chart a route back to power

        Increased migration has been a defining trend of the past decade, changing both the economic structure and social fabric of our country. It has also been one to which the left in general, and the Labour party in particular, has struggled to articulate a response. With today’s high levels of inward migration likely to continue for the foreseeable future, regaining trust on immigration is a crucial task for the left. Not only for electoral reasons but because ever-rising immigration brings real […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News PCS’ praise for Corbyn as it considers Labour affiliation

    PCS’ praise for Corbyn as it considers Labour affiliation

    Trade union PCS has moved one step closer to affiliating with Labour as John McDonnell called on its conference to show “solidarity”. The civil service union has passed a motion to review its political campaigning following Jeremy Corbyn’s landslide win in the Labour leadership contest. Mark Serwotka, the outspoken general secretary who recently rejoined Labour, brought a motion paving the way for a review of its “relations with anti-austerity” in the devolved administrations and its relations with Labour, “including the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Liam Byrne: Whether you love or loathe Alan Sugar, Britain needs its entrepreneurs to succeed

    Liam Byrne: Whether you love or loathe Alan Sugar, Britain needs its entrepreneurs to succeed

      Lord Sugar has his work cut out. The brusque business star of TV’s The Apprentice ain’t everyone’s cup of tea, but we all need him to succeed in his new job as the Government’s enterprise tzar. Because all is not well in Britain’s enterprise economy. Britain is loads more enterprising than it used to be. We boast nearly 2 million more firms than at the turn of the century – as it happens, many of them created in the […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Unions Jeremy Corbyn backs cross-party call for Orgreave inquiry

    Jeremy Corbyn backs cross-party call for Orgreave inquiry

    Jeremy Corbyn has signed a cross-party letter to Home Secretary Theresa May demanding an inquiry into the actions of police officers at Orgreave during the miners’ strike. The letter calls for an investigation into allegations of police brutality at the coking plant in South Yorkshire, during the 1984-85 strike. It says that the inquiry must look into “how and whether police forces – ostensibly there to serve their communities – were used against one”. Around 70 Labour MPs have put their […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Steel crisis and Chinese dumping shows why we need a truly ethical foreign policy

    Steel crisis and Chinese dumping shows why we need a truly ethical foreign policy

      While Carwyn Jones, Welsh First Minister, has travelled to India to ensure the board of Tata consider the implications of the sale of Port Talbot steelworks, Angela Eagle has called for China to be refused “market economy status”. This is an important statement. It indicates the party is changing policy. We need a new consensus on international trade.   In 1930, President Herbert Hoover signed into law the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act which imposed a 50 per cent tax on […]

    Read more →
x

LabourList Daily Email

Everything Labour. Every weekday morning

Share with your friends










Submit