Civil liberties and fear: Labour must address both

June 2, 2010 9:53 am

ID cardsBy Bill Dewison

Since the Labour Party left Downing Street there has been much hand-wringing here on LabourList as to what exactly went wrong. Figures are quoted regularly as to the increases in teachers, the new schools and hospitals that have been built and generally how Labour have improved the lives of everyone in the UK over the past 13 years. So why would the population of the country reject the party?

One answer is fear. Not the media version of fear, the version we have read about where millions apparently now rely on handouts and will vote Labour to keep their Sky television and cigarettes. It’s another type of fear, a real fear that was created by the Labour government in its quest to keep us all wrapped up in cotton wool.

To put this fear into context, there are many who will remember just over 17 years ago when the Provisional Irish Republican Army bombed the gas works in Warrington. Although there was nobody injured in the bombing, PC Mark Toker was shot later whilst investigating a vehicle he believed to be involved with the bombing.

Less than a month later, the IRA struck at the heart of Warrington again and this time claimed the life of a 3 year old boy, Johnathan Ball, and five days later Tim Parry, who was just 12 years old, died in hospital of his injuries. 54 people were injured in this attack and it sent a shockwave through the whole of Warrington. I regularly visit Warrington and I can not look at a litter bin now without thinking of what the IRA did.

Around the country, people can tell you of the atrocities visited upon them by the IRA, not least the people who attended the Conservative Party conference in Brighton back in 1984. Thatcher may be disliked now for what she did whilst in office, but that day back in 1984 where she narrowly escaped death, she did something amazing. Despite the fact that two senior members of her cabinet had been injured, ignoring the fact that she and her husband could have been killed and knowing that the bomb may not have been the only one, she called a press conference in the early hours of the morning to inform the British media that the IRA had not changed a thing, the conference would continue. Much as I look back at Thatcher and think of the damage she caused to the communities I grew up in, I can’t help admiring her grit and determination on that day. I decided then that I wouldn’t let the fear of what could happen change my day to day life.

So, why the history lesson? Well, it highlights that the danger posed by the IRA was significant and real; and no greater than that posed by Islamic Fundamentalists, the people who are blamed for the huge changes we’ve seen over the last decade with regards to the civil liberties enjoyed by the people of Britain.

So why is it that millions of people could live through the constant threat of the IRA in our towns and cities without the need for government to alter our basic freedoms as a nation, but when a threat arises from another networked terror organisation, this time from the middle east and albeit more international, all of a sudden we need to have ID cards and countless anti-terrorism laws which alter the very core of our civil liberties?

The Labour Party above all other political parties is supposed to fight for our civil liberties and for our freedom. The last thing anyone expected when they voted Labour was to be monitored by more CCTV cameras than anywhere else in Europe, to have anti-terrorism laws used against people who were trying to send their children to a better school and I doubt people would have queued at the polling station if they thought an age old conservative idea of tagging the population of Britain with identity cards would become a Labour policy.

When Labour returns to office I believe it needs to remember that fairness, equality and human rights are not just political buzzwords to squeeze into public speeches. They are not words to make a good headline or to rally the troops at party conference. They are the very core of the Labour Party, or they should be.

Thomas Jefferson sums up my feelings on what happened to the Labour Party in the latter half of its administration. He is quoted as saying “When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.” In other words, the government in office can get away with frightening the people of Britain into draconian rules and laws until democracy allows the people its voice to tell that government exactly what it thinks of it all.

I believe the people did speak in the last general election. And the Labour Party – and particularly whoever becomes its new leader – needs to listen very carefully to what the electorate really told Labour.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →