Replacing schools of the future with ‘free schools’ – where’s the fairness in that?

June 1, 2010 2:59 pm

GoveBy Sally Gimson

I do not know why more parents are not making a fuss about the new education secretary’s free schools plan. Many parents are going to see their children’s schools worse off as a result of these proposals. And that includes me.

I have not been consulted about plans to take away money that was promised to the schools to which my children go. My kids are part of the current system and doing well in it. I have neither the time nor the inclination to set up a new school for my kids. But because I am happy with the education my children are getting, my children’s schools are going to suffer – so much for parental choice.

You see, I live in Camden. The last government was giving us £200 million as part of the Building Schools for the Future programme to improve our local school buildings. The secondary school where one of my daughter goes (and the other will follow in four years time), Parliament Hill, was going to have £18 million spent on new classrooms.

William Ellis, where I intend to send my son (now in Year Five), was going to have new buildings and less cramped facilities (at the moment it is an old 700 capacity school with 900 pupils). Both are good schools, both need bringing up to modern standards.

Now that is all up in the air. The new government has said it is going to review all the Building Schools for the Future spending. The Institute for Fiscal Studies reckons that it can only bring in its free schools policy if it diverts money for renovating old schools into the free schools programme.

So where is the fairness in that? What say do parents have about this decision? None – we have not been consulted.

This decision is being taken centrally by the Department of Education. It has nothing to do with what most parents want or with what might be good for their children. It has all to do with an ideology which wants to privatise schools and create a market in education. And the government can’t do that thoroughly without investing state money in lots of new schools to create that market artificially.

So Michael Gove is going to give shouty middle class parents like Toby Young (an alumnus of William Ellis, ironically) the money to set up new schools, but it is my children and the thousands of other children at schools in Camden and elsewhere who are going to be made to pay for it.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →