The inherent injustice and inhumanity of IPPs

June 25, 2010 10:07 am

PrisonBy Brian Barder / @brianlb

Many things are badly wrong with our prisons policies: chronic over-crowding of ageing prisons, too many on short-term sentences with no time for rehabilitation, leading to high re-offending rates. But another little-noticed scandal is the system of Indeterminate Sentences for Public Protection, oddly abbreviated to IPPs. Literally thousands of people are indefinitely incarcerated, sometimes for years after serving the punishment part of their sentences, but still kept in jail because they can’t prove that they won’t re-offend.

Last week I wrote this letter to the Guardian (which published a heavily edited version of it on 22 June):

Polly Toynbee is right to point to the obscene waste of public money involved in short-term prison sentences which achieve nothing (Forget being tough, it’s time to get realistic on crime, Comment & debate, 22 June). She might also have mentioned the folly, waste and injustice of Indeterminate Sentences for Public Protection (IPPs), which currently add massively to shameful overcrowding in our prisons. They waste public money on a vast scale by keeping in prison thousands of people who have served their sentences imposed for punishment, rehabilitation and deterrence but who can’t prove to a Parole Board that they won’t reoffend if released, often because there are no places for them on the behaviour courses which they need to attend as a virtual condition for release.

These people are in preventive detention, being punished for future offences they haven’t committed, often with no hope of release, fearing that they are in prison for life, having already been punished for often quite minor offences. The onus is on them to prove a negative about the future, which is conceptually impossible as well as reversing the normal onus of proof. The proportion of IPPers so far released is minuscule. Justice Department ministers of the new government have acknowledged that the system is unacceptable: Crispin Blunt [, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice,] told parliament on 15 June that “We have 6,000 IPP prisoners, well over 2,500 of whom have exceeded their tariff point. Many cannot get on courses because our prisons are wholly overcrowded and unable to address offending behaviour. That is not a defensible position.

It’s inhumane, unjust and a monumental waste of taxpayers’ money. All parties should now insist that the system is swept away and those IPPers who have served their minimum sentences should be released forthwith, either unconditionally or on licence. Here’s a useful cut in government spending that will benefit everyone.

IPPs are a New Labour invention that has failed. A welcome policy of the new government is its promise to review the voluminous crime, terrorism and prison legislation inherited from New Labour and in need of enlightened reform. A review of sentencing policy, one ingredient of this, is due to report by October. This offers a unique opportunity to get rid of IPPs for good. They inflict misery and fear on thousands of people who have paid the penalty for offending but now live in deadly fear that they will never be released. They inflict misery and fear on the families of those indefinitely incarcerated in preventive detention, not as punishment for offences they have committed and for which they have been punished, but because some men in suits are afraid that they may do it again if they agree to let them out. Perversely, the onus is on them to prove that they won’t reoffend: but how can they prove a negative about the future?

Three years ago I posted an article on my own blog trying to expose the injustice and indefensibility of IPPs. That article prompted 150 ‘comments’, many from relatives of IPP prisoners, expressing vividly and painfully their anguish and despair at the fate which has overtaken those they love, however flawed. Those comments have become a forum for IPP relatives to exchange their experiences, fears, hopes, and ideas about ways in which the system might be reformed. The forum now continues in comments on a new blog post in which I appeal to everyone, of whatever political persuasion, to write urgently to their MPs asking them to use their influence with Ken Clarke, the new Justice Secretary, or his Parliamentary Under-Secretary, Crispin Blunt (whose enlightened comments on IPPs I quoted in my letter to the Guardian – see above), to make sure that IPPs are within the remit of the review of sentencing policy promised by the new government: and to ensure that the outcome of the review will be to sweep away the whole IPP system, with all IPP prisoners who have served their tariffs (‘minimum sentences’) released unconditionally (or on licence) forthwith.

I would like to hope that LabourList readers, whatever their politics, will press their MPs (in their own words but perhaps quoting this) to approach Justice Department ministers accordingly. Conservative MPs may be most readily persuaded of the need to scrap IPPs by pointing to the horrific cost to the taxpayers – us — of keeping in prison, year after year, thousands of people who shouldn’t be there. Ending IPPs and releasing IPP prisoners at the end of their tariffs might well make the costly programme of new prison building unnecessary, a handy contribution to deficit reduction on which this government is (in my view irrationally) fixated. Labour, old-style LibDem and other MPs may be more impressed by arguments about the inherent injustice and inhumanity of IPPs: the needless suffering and wrecking of people’s lives that they entail: the morally and intellectually dishonourable practice of locking people up for future offences that they haven’t committed and are in most cases no more likely to commit, if they are released, than the next man in the supermarket queue. Above all, it’s essential that Labour in parliament should not yield to the temptation to oppose abolition of this indefensible system just because it was introduced, unaccountably, by a Labour government.

Please write to your MP about this, and please don’t leave it until too late.

Related posts:

  1. It’s time David Miliband went to Gaza and saw the injustice
  2. In a modern society there can be no room for stirers of intolerance or injustice

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Local Government News Prezza for Police Commissioner?

    Prezza for Police Commissioner?

    According to the Hull and East Riding Mail: “Lord Prescott said: “I want the opportunity to continue my public service to the region with a mandate from the people to protect the community and target criminals. “I feel that after proudly serving as a local MP for 40 years and as a cabinet minister for 10 years, I have the experience to listen to the public and help be their strong voice in supporting the police and holding them to [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured A big moment for the NHS – and for blogging

    A big moment for the NHS – and for blogging

    Today marks a big moment – not just in British blogging history, but in British political history. The decision by cabinet ministers to go to ConHome calling for the health bill to be dropped is a breach of collective responsibility, that much is clear. That they have briefed ConHome anonymously makes very little difference – Tim Montgomerie is a scrupulous character who can be taken at his word. These cabinet ministers, whoever they are, are angry. And they want this [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Is there a thin blue line for the new Police and Crime Commissioners?

    Is there a thin blue line for the new Police and Crime Commissioners?

    The process to select candidates for the new Police Crime Commissioners is underway. The Labour Party NEC will be long-listing at the end of February. The Liberal Democrats have, I understand, said that they do not intend to field candidates from a nationally organised position but will offer support to local parties taking the initiative. In the past, the Conservatives have declared that they will be hosting open primaries but no news is yet emerging on when and where these [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Another Lembit video

    Another Lembit video

    Earlier this week we brought you the internet sensation that is “Pop Lembit”. But as we all know Lembit has always been an extrovert, and it turns out he has something in his back catalogue that is almost as spectacular as his most recent output. It’s a little longer, but it’s just as …engaging. Ladies and gentlemen – introducing…retro Lembit… (Via Popbitch (via Mark Pack))

    Read more →
  • News Quote of the day: Miliband wants PMQs reform

    Quote of the day: Miliband wants PMQs reform

    According to the Guardian: “I find the Westminster village gets much more excited about it than the population, I believe. I don’t know how to change it so I’m not going to make false promises about changing it but I would love to change it if I could.”

    Read more →