How much do union nominations matter?

16th July, 2010 10:53 am

UnionsBy Sunder Katwala / @nextleft

How much difference will trade union endorsements make in the Labour leadership?

The truth is that nobody knows for sure. There is a tendency to overstate the influence of union executives in “delivering” swathes of voters, partly a hangover from the days of the trade union bloc vote, so that the 1983 leadership contest was effectively in the bag for Neil Kinnock by teatime on the day the election was announced.

Fortunately, party democracy has come a long way – and candidates need to appeal to several million individual voters, who will not vote as a block.

What we do know is that the last time Labour held a leadership election, union endorsements made almost no difference at all, as can be seen by the lists of formal supporting nominations for the candidates in that three-way contest.

Tony Blair won 52.3% of the affiliated section of the ballot, against 28.4% for John Prescott and 19.3% for Margaret Beckett. The figures for the affiliated section were pretty close to those among individual party members, where Blair won 58.2% with Prescott on 24.4% and Margaret Beckett on 17.4%.

Margaret Beckett had a supporting nomination from the large Transport and General Workers Union.

John Prescott had formal supporting nominations from the following:

Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers & Firemen; Graphical, Paper &
Media Union; National Association of Colliery Overmen, Deputies & Shotfirers;
National Union of Mineworkers; National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport
Workers

While Tony Blair had only the Iron and Steel Trades Confederation – a decade later to become part of the merged union Community, which has nominated David Miliband. (Blair also got rather apt supporting nominations from the Christian Socialist Movement and the Society of Labour Lawyers, as well as Labour students).

So the lesson of 1994 was that nominations had a very weak effect on individual votes in the affiliated section.

However, the candidates are aware that they made rather more difference in 2007, as Patrick Wintour has set out, though the union-by-union figures no longer appear to be publicly available. On the first ballot, Harriet Harman and Hilary Benn did much better among individual members than affiliates, while John Cruddas and Peter Hain did much better among affiliate voters.

Which precedent is more likely to be relevant in 2010?

One might expect endorsements to play a considerably more important role in a deputy leadership contest.

Firstly, there is considerably less national media coverage of a deputy leadership contest, though it is also true that the 2010 race has had less media profile (certainly for any single candidate) than was the case in 1994, where a mid-term contest with Labour so far ahead in the polls made the winner an overwhelming favourite to be the next Prime Minister.

Secondly, there was a much smaller turnout in a deputy race. (From memory, this was as low as 9-10% among trade unions in the affiliated section in 2007, though socialist society turnout – 50% among Fabian Society members – was usually more like that of individual party members). The low union turnout meant that the relative weight of closely engaged union members and activists, perhaps most likely to be engaged with union committee endorsements, would be considerably greater. (My personal guesstimate is that a leadership contest turnout will be at least triple that, and probably higher).

However, perhaps a countervailing difference between 2010 and 1994 is the larger field of leadership candidates, and the more nuanced differences in terms of the political positioning of several of the leading candidates. And if a union endorsement might have some influence on voters’ second preferences, that could well matter in 2010 as it did not in the three-cornered first round victory of Blair in 1994.

This was also posted at Next Left.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment The speech Ed Miliband could make on Friday morning

    The speech Ed Miliband could make on Friday morning

    For days the Tories and the right-wing press have been questioning the legitimacy of Labour coming second but still taking power. Never mind that it’s a tacit admission of defeat by David Cameron, the legitimacy argument matters. While arithmetic will be the most important factor in deciding what happens next, the way the party leaders steer the public debate will make a difference. So what should Ed say on 8th of May? Here’s the imagined speech I think Miliband could […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured “Take a minute, sit down, and read this” – Douglas Alexander’s final state of the race memo

    “Take a minute, sit down, and read this” – Douglas Alexander’s final state of the race memo

    Here’s Douglas Alexander’s final state of the race memo  – which LabourList readers can read exclusively before anyone else. Dear Friend, This might sound strange, but whatever you are doing, I want you to take a minute, sit down, and read this: That’s because it’s important, even momentarily, to realise just how big a moment we are all now part of. Our actions over the next 36 hours can make a huge difference to our country. By being part of […]

    Read more →
  • News Vince Cable agrees with Balls and Miliband on the economy

    Vince Cable agrees with Balls and Miliband on the economy

    On BBC Election Call, Vince Cable has said that Labour had some responsibility for the financial crash, but says that the crash was not caused by Labour spending too much. This mirrors Labour’s line. Ed Balls has previously apologised for Labour’s lack of regulation of the banks. But both Balls and Miliband continue to argue that it was not Labour spending that caused the crisis. In what could be read as very careful positioning, Cable also argues that he is a […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The truth about Europe: we’re better in than out

    The truth about Europe: we’re better in than out

    This article is written by Jude Kirton-Darling and Paul Brannen  In his five years in office, David Cameron’s to-ing and fro-ing over Europe has reduced to rags the UK’s reputation in the European Union (EU), relegating our once-influential nation to bystander status on global issues. Leaving the other European leaders to negotiate over what to do about the crisis in Ukraine, the rise of ISIL and the Eurozone’s continued troubles, our Conservative-led Government has gone into retreat, instead choosing to focus […]

    Read more →
  • News Axelrod on “partisan players” in the UK press

    Axelrod on “partisan players” in the UK press

    David Axelrod is back in the US after around a week in the UK in the final run up to the general election. Questions have been raised about his level of involvement (especially considering the rumoured £300,000 cost of hiring him). In an “exit interview” with the US site Politico, Axelrod said that his role was “Consulting on the phone, mainly consulting on message”, and said that he’d been in the UK around half a dozen times. Axelrod highlighted the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit