Men must champion these issues, not just women

July 24, 2010 10:20 am

ed balls black and whiteBy Ed Balls MP / @edballsmp

Equality for women is at the heart of everything Labour stands for. We championed it when we were in government and we should be proud of the success we achieved in areas from increased maternity leave to boosting women’s pensions.

But women in Britain now face the greatest threat to their independence and opportunities for many decades, as the new government’s policies threaten to turn back the clock to the eighties or even the fifties.

And that means that men as well as women need to wake up to the reactionary threat this government poses.

Women across the Labour Party have worked hard for years to deliver greater equality for women. I am proud that Labour led the way in the greater representation of women in parliament, but there is still much more to do to change our party and our political culture – as I set out in my response to the Lead for Women campaign.

But men and women – including Labour’s new leader – need to stand together to fend off the Tory-Liberal onslaught and to go further in pursuit of equal pay and greater equality for women too.

Many women’s lives improved as a direct result of action we took over those thirteen years. We enhanced maternity leave and raised maternity pay, expanded higher education, established the Minimum Wage, made available more high quality, affordable childcare places and legislated to ensure more flexible jobs were created.

Now it is clear that equality for women faces the greatest onslaught in decades as a result of unfair policies of the Tory-Lib Dem coalition.

Yvette has done some really important work on the budget, showing that women will pay on average three times as much as men in the budget benefit cuts and direct tax changes. Child tax credits, child benefit and maternity support are predominantly paid to women who in total will lose billions as a result of the cuts.

But this doesn’t just hit mothers’ pockets it restricts the choices they can make and the freedom they have over their lives. Mums who decided to work part-time or stay off work with their new born baby for a few extra months may find they are no longer able to afford it. And those Mums who find that childcare is now too expensive may be forced to give up work altogether.

And it’s not just about families with children. Women will be hit harder because of the cuts to carer’s allowance and the second state pension. Women are also likely to shoulder most of the impact of the cuts to public services, because more women than men work in public services and more women than men use those services too.

In criminal justice too, the signs are disturbing. The Tory-Liberal government’s proposals for rape defendants to be granted anonymity during court cases turns the clock back to the 1970s – implying that women are unreliable witnesses and more likely to make false accusations too. Not only is this approach unjust and unjustified, it will make the task of catching and convicting rapists more difficult, at a time when conviction rates for rape are already too low.

Underpinning these deeply unfair changes is a reactionary and traditional approach to women and the family. With too few women in the new government they simply don’t get the reality of family life today.

We must fight hard for women’s interests so that we can sustain the advances made for women when we were in office.

But defending what is already in place should not be the limit of our ambitions.

We need to go further. Although real progress was made towards women’s equality while we were in government due to the leadership of Harriet Harman, the fact is we didn’t go far enough, and I know Harriet would be the first to agree.

This is most obvious on the issue of equal pay. Ensuring that men and women are paid the same amount for jobs of equal worth should be an example of equality in action. Forty years after the passing of the Equal Pay Act the average gender pay gap in this country still stands at a shameful 16.4%. And for some women the gap is even bigger; women in their forties, in skilled trades, in part time work and in the private sector are especially likely to be unfairly paid.

It is true that the pay gap has narrowed since 1970 – as it did throughout our time in government – but progress has simply been too slow. Now there is a real risk that under the Tory-Liberal Democrats that progress could grind to a halt or even go into reverse.

The Labour Party got the Equality Bill onto the statute book before the Election, but actually implementing it now needs positive action from the new Government who instead are trying to back track or water it down.

Campaigning for the full implementation of the 2010 Equality Act must be a top Labour priority. And we need to view this as just the first step towards more far-reaching reform. There is a strong argument for us to work towards extending the duty to promote equality to private companies with more than 150 staff, not only those with 250 staff, as the Act requires. The pay gaps of very large companies should be published; recognised equality representatives should have rights to information and facilities at work; and we need more collective pay agreements. We also need to increase the Minimum Wage above £7.

And I think we need an open discussion about setting achievable milestones for reducing the gender pay gap, on the way to an explicit Labour goal of eventually closing it altogether.

The struggle for equal pay has been long drawn out in this country: today, it’s hard to believe that women teachers only won the right in 1961 and women civil servants a year later. Yet the first demand for equal pay was made by women working for Robert Owen in 1832.

We need to keep up the campaign in other areas too, going much further on flexible working, for higher paid, higher quality part time work, tackling discrimination and prejudice. It means continuing to extend child care and support for families – issues I championed in government.

But it also means getting men to do more in the family too. As we know one of the major factors responsible for the pay gap is that women still do the bulk of the unpaid caring work in most families.

I won’t pretend to have everything sorted in my own family, for all my cooking and cleaning skills, as Yvette will often remind me. But let’s be clear, women already share the responsibility of contributing to the family income, and men need to do more in the family too. That’s why I championed things like greater paternity leave for men.

Too often throughout our history the cause of women’s equality has been championed by women without the fully committed support of men. Our generation in the Labour Party – and Labour’s next leader – has to change that for good.

Related posts:

  1. LabourList poll: Labour and Women
  2. In our 50th year, the Young Fabians will launch a new programme for young women activists
  3. We need more women at the top table of Europe
  4. Wanted: more women
  5. Wanted: More women

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →
  • News NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    NHS polling – public tell Cameron to drop the bill

    There’s some devastating YouGov polling on NHS “reform” for Cameron to digest today. Firstly, the public are firmly against his reforms. Almost half (48%) of the public oppose the reforms, compared to just 18% who back them. But it’s not just the broad idea of the reforms that the public oppose – it’s the specifics. On the question of whether increasing competition in the NHS will improve health services (something which Labour were not against in principle in office), the [...]

    Read more →