So, was that the first internet election?

July 5, 2010 1:13 pm

By Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

As I wrote in last month’s Progress magazine, from September to May it was impossible to escape the notion that somehow the internet was going to play a significant role in the campaign and the election outcome – though frankly no one could quite tell you exactly how or why. Journalists in the traditional media, in particular, seemed obsessed with the idea that this was going to be the first internet election, the first digital election, the first Facebook or Twitter or Mumsnet election. It gave them a handy sub-narrative to the election and campaign.

Of course, it never quite worked out that way. While the web undoubtedly played a role, and we saw thousands of activists connecting with each other online unleashed to the streets to connect with voters in the real world, most people would agree that we may have to wait another few years for that elusive “first web election”, or at least for one in which the web is seen as decisive.

But there’s still a lot of interest in how the internet played a role, and how it will continue to play a role in the future, and in new institutions that will shape the fightback in our next campaigns, in the leadership election, etc.

Social media platform Yoosk crowd sourced a load of good questions on this topic recently, and kindly asked me my thoughts on some of them, alongside Mark Pack from Lib Dem Voice and James Evans form Hustings.com. Our answers, if you’re interested in this sort of stuff, are below.

* Was the 2010 general election an internet election?

* Which website, blogs or twitterers made the biggest contribution to the debate?

Has the internet killed the election poster?

* Does the fact that two candidates were rapidly deselected following ill-conceived tweets or online comments show that it’s unrealistic to expect truly open, honest and informal dialogue online?

* The majority of Labour candidates did not even have any online donation facilities, let alone use them to their full potential. Why do you think this side of fundraising gets such short shrift and what lessons could candidates learn from the ever-praised Obama campaign?

* Looking back at LabourList’s election content and campaign, if you could go back and do one thing differently, what would it be?

Related posts:

  1. How will the internet affect the general election?
  2. Labour’s legacy, the internet election: You ask, they answer
  3. Forget The Sun – we can move our underdog campaign to the internet
  4. The co-operative model offers governance for the internet age
  5. Internet equality will never compensate for the stereotypes that poison our debate

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →