Why I’m backing Ed Miliband for leader

July 20, 2010 11:26 am

Ed Miliband The GuardianBy John Denham MP

Thankfully, this Labour leadership election is no re-run of the poisonous Benn vs. Healey fight of 30 years ago. Anyone who has been to the hustings has seen a team of potential leaders who focus their ire on the mistakes of David Cameron and George Osborne, not on each other.

But we shouldn’t let the civility of proceedings mask the fact that there are some pretty fundamental political issues in play. The most important is about how much Labour needs to change to win again.

The truth is that the seeds of Labour’s defeat pre-dated Gordon Brown’s premiership. We lost power in 2010, but we had lost 4 million votes between 1997 and 2005. All the issues that cost us the last election – the loss of connection with hard-working families; concerns about the impact of migration; the deep sense of unfairness at the way effort was rewarded – were already established after our first two terms in office. The haemorrhage of our vote tells us that something more fundamental was at stake in 2010 than a failure to communicate effectively.

Labour needs a new leader who recognises these problems and has a plan to address them. The future cannot be a simple re-run of the past but with better presentation.

They need to learn the lesson, so clear from Lord Mandelson’s book, that we need to decisively turn the page on the era of Blairites and Brownites. We need a new leader that will put the infighting of the New Labour establishment behind us. Real strength comes from being open to ideas and debate, rather than treating politics like the genteel (and sometimes not so genteel) gang warfare described in Peter’s book.

But it is not just about leadership style. It also about learning the lessons as we put forward our programme for government.

It’s not hard to find members and supporters who are proud of what we achieved but who worry we could have done more. They feel that if we had stayed better in touch we could still have been in government today. And they are right.

We created many jobs but in a labour market where too many people found neither personal progress nor security. Our welfare reforms aided many of the poorest but sharpened the divide between those who received help and those who did not. Our public service reform got sidetracked – we recognised that people want choice within services, but we confused that with the idea that markets in public services are the only way to get improvement. The significance of the Iraq War is not how individuals voted but whether we recognise the failures in policy making that made the mistaken war possible. Our faith in the state solution to every problem led to a casualness about individual liberty.

The New Labour establishment’s view of the world does not meet these challenges. Unless we change we will not win.

The reason that many of us support Ed Miliband is because he is the credible candidate for change. Credible because he could beyond doubt be Prime Minister. And credible because he has set out most clearly how Labour needs to change if we are to win again.

He is willing to address the challenges of fairness and responsibility throughout society. That is true at the bottom of the income scale where he is campaigning for a Living Wage. It is true in the middle of the income scale where he will strengthen the contributory principle in welfare and ensure that people who pay in to the system see that rewarded. And it is true at the top of the very top of scale where he is in favour of a High Pay Commission.

He is willing to address the excesses of market power and the excesses of state power. Ed Miliband is right to argue that we need to protect crucial aspects of life from marketisation – whether by limiting advertising aimed at our children or by protecting our town centres from becoming a land of late night bars. And he is right to argue that we need to do much more to recognise that the state can be as over-bearing as the market, whether in the way it can intrude on civil liberties or the labyrinthine way in which services sometimes work.

The voters we lost will not easily be won back. They may be shocked and angered at the coalition’s actions but before they come back to us they will want to know that we have changed too. Ed Miliband is the candidate willing to make those changes. He is the candidate best able to win those voters back.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →