Why I’m backing Ed Miliband for leader

July 13, 2010 12:37 pm

Ed MilibandBy Mike Ion / @MikeIon

For some weeks now I have been taking every opportunity I can to tell my fellow Labour party members why I want Ed Miliband to be the next leader of our movement.

I was delighted when I heard that Ed had decided to throw his hat in the ring and for the past few weeks I have been actively supporting his campaign in any way that I can. I admire Ed Miliband enormously and feel that he is a man of integrity and stature, and I am confident that he will have broad appeal both across the party and the country.

For me Ed’s main appeal is his message that only collaboration can help make Britain everything that it ought to be – a nation reunited with itself and rededicated to its best ideals. Ed Miliband is a politician who is passionate that government must do things with people, he sees political debate in terms of progress versus conservatism and the world not in terms of right and left, but right and wrong.

One of the things that sets Ed apart from the other leadership contenders is the fact that he has long recognised that one of the the main reasons that people are turned off politics is because it (political debate) seems irrelevant to them. He understands many ordinary voters feel they are being manipulated because they are always being asked to make false choices: you’re labelled as either staunchly religious or vehemently secular, pro-business or pro-union, pro-growth or pro-environment, for civil liberties or against them, a progressive or a dinosaur.

Ed Miliband knows that the truth is, of course, that most people don’t think like this, that most people don’t live their lives in this way, and that the majority of the electorate long for a politics where we have genuine arguments, vigorous disagreements, where we don’t claim to have a monopoly on what is right or wrong, where we don’t demonise our political opponents. Most people want their politicians to engage in what Barack Obama called a “fair-minded” approach to politics; politics that understands that truth and certainty are not the same thing. Some describe this approach as the politics of the common good or perhaps more accurately, the politics of hope.

I am firmly of the view that Ed Miliband is the candidate who is best placed to help shape the future direction of our party. Ed is a conviction politician. He has proved himself as an effective and hard-working MP and as an outstanding government Minister. I am backing Ed because I want my party to be led by someone who will listen to ordinary party members, people who are driven not by personal ambition but by an ambitious agenda for our nation. Ed will be a leader who will challenge us – individually and collectively – not to just to want more but to be more and he is someone who is capable of inspiring trust and confidence across the political spectrum.

Ed Miliband espouses a politics that looks for co-operation not competition, the hand up and not just the hand out. Looking at how people have already signed up to support Ed, it is clear that many others believe that such sentiments are important – indeed they are worth voting for.

Related posts:

  1. Why I’m backing David Miliband for leader
  2. Why I’m backing David Miliband for leader
  3. Why I’m backing Diane Abbott for leader
  4. Why I’m backing Andy Burnham for leader
  5. Why I’m backing Ed Balls for leader

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →