Latest LabourList leadership survey: The results

August 14, 2010 11:27 am

By Mark Ferguson / @markfergusonuk

Ed Miliband is now the prefered choice to be Labour leader amonst LabourList readers, according to our new poll, conducted between Monday afternoon and noon today.

Ed moves ahead of his brother for the first time in this series of surveys, taking the majority of the first preferences with 33.4% of the vote. Brother David is in second place with 30.2%, his lead having been shortened in our last survey, and overhauled in this penultimate one.

Ed also maintains a healthy lead amongst trade union supporters on first preferences (35.3% – a lead of 7.4%), although this is of course a smaller sample than the wider survey, and will naturally include a great deal of overlap.

Diane Abbott remains in third place in our full survey on 14.7%, but when non-members are excluded she slips back into fourth place behind Andy Burnham. Diane appears to be the most “marmite” of the candidates on offer, with nearly 50% of voters placing her as their fifth choice candidate, despite her being in third place on overall first preferences.

Burnham certainly seems to have the most support amongst members who aren’t supporting one of the Milibands. He picks up alot of second and third preferences (23.9% and 27.9%) – and there’s maybe a chance he could still have a role to play in the final reckoning if he can stay alive through the first two rounds of voting.

There’s little good news for Ed Balls in the headline figures, as he languishes in 5th place in both our overall survey (9.1%), and amongst members (8.7%). However this is a near doubling of his support since our last poll, and he’s clearly making up ground – with more 2nd/3rd preferences than last time out, it just seems that he’s struggling to break through into being people’s first choice.

Of course there are real caveats that must be applied to any reading of this survey. This isn’t an opinion poll, the results aren’t scientific (or reflective of the entire voting pool) and of course by their very nature these surveys are self-selecting. However, what this does provide us with is a snapshot of how our readers are feeling about the candidates over a set time period, and some of the trends (Ed Miliband gaining support, Ed Balls winning people over, Diane Abbott failing to keep up her early momentum) appear on the surface to have some merit.

That is not to say that Ed Miliband will beat his brother amongst party members. That’s by no means what these numbers suggest. What they do suggest is that this week, Ed Miliband is the LabourList reader’s frontrunner – and that’s not a position he’s been in before.

First pref august leadership

The full results of last week’s poll, which was taken by 912 people, are as follows:

* ALL RESPONDENTS”

FIRST PREFERENCES:
Ed Miliband (33.4%)
David Miliband (30.2%)
Diane Abbott (14.7%)
Andy Burnham (12.5%)
Ed Balls (9.1%)

SECOND PREFERENCES:
Ed Miliband (24.4%)
Andy Burnham (23.9%)
David Miliband (22.6%)
Ed Balls (18.8%)
Diane Abbott (10.4%)

THIRD PREFERENCES:
Andy Burnham (27.9%)
Ed Balls (26.1%)
Ed Miliband (19.6%)
David Miliband (16.0%)
Diane Abbott (10.5%)

FOURTH PREFERENCES:
Ed Balls (28.9%)
Andy Burnham (23.3%)
Diane Abbott (16.6%)
David Miliband (15.8%)
Ed Miliband (15.3%)

FIFTH PREFERENCES:
Diane Abbott (46.4%)
Ed Balls (18.8%)
David Miliband (17.5%)
Andy Burnham (11.2%)
Ed Miliband (6.2%)

The spread of preferences was broadly similar amongst respondents who identified themselves as members of the Labour Party (83% of the total number of respondents). Notable differences are the increased support for Ed Miliband, and that Andy Burnham is pipping Diane Abbott into third place for the third time.

* PEOPLE ANSWERING “YES” TO “ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY?”

FIRST PREFERENCES:
Ed Miliband (35.7%)
David Miliband (30.3%)
Andy Burnham (12.8%)
Diane Abbott (12.5%)
Ed Balls (8.7%)

SECOND PREFERENCES:
Andy Burnham (24.7%)
David Miliband (24.0%)
Ed Miliband (22.3%)
Ed Balls (19.2%)
Diane Abbott (9.9%)

THIRD PREFERENCES:
Andy Burnham (27.3%)
Ed Balls (26.3%)
Ed Miliband (19.2%)
Ed Balls (16.6%)
Diane Abbott (10.6%)

FOURTH PREFERENCES:
Ed Balls (29.3%)
Andy Burnham (23.6%)
Diane Abbott (17%)
Ed Miliband (15.1%)
David Miliband (15%)

FIFTH PREFERENCES:
Diane Abbott (48%)
Ed Balls (17.6%)
David Miliband (17.2%)
Andy Burnham (10.5%)
Ed Miliband (6.7%)

Amongst people who identified as members of a trade union, Ed Miliband holds a commanding lead in first preferences, but the message isn’t as clear when we get into 2nd/3rd preferences:

* PEOPLE ANSWERING “YES” TO “ARE YOU A MEMBER OF A TRADE UNION?”

FIRST PREFERENCES:
Ed Miliband (35.3%)
David Miliband (27.9%)
Diane Abbott (14.9%)
Andy Burnham (12%)
Ed Balls (9.9%)

SECOND PREFERENCES:
Ed Miliband (23.9%)
David Miliband (23.7%)
Andy Burnham (22.4%)
Ed Balls (19.6%)
Diane Abbott (10.4%)

THIRD PREFERENCES:
Andy Burnham (28.8%)
Ed Balls (26.5%)
Ed Miliband (19.3%)
David Miliband (14.2%)
Diane Abbott (11.2%)

FOURTH PREFERENCES:
Ed Balls (25.8%)
Andy Burnham (24.2%)
Diane Abbott (19.1%)
David Miliband (18.2%)
Ed Miliband (12.7%)

FIFTH PREFERENCES:
Diane Abbott (42.8%)
David Miliband (20%)
Ed Balls (17.8%)
Andy Burnham (11.7%)
Ed Miliband (7.7%)

Later in the week, I will look at how people who voted for each candidate used their second, third, fourth and fifth preferences in percentage terms. The leadership contest looks certain to hinge on the spread of those transferred votes.

The survey was conducted between 1.30pm on Monday 9th August and noon on Friday 13th August. 912 LabourList readers participated and repeat IP addresses were revoved.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →