Ideas for electability: The right to own

October 22, 2010 1:19 pm

Author:

Share this Article

Employee OwnershipBy James Doran

The global financial crisis and consequent recession caused our party to revise its approach to regulation, industrial policy, and taxation – but we were unable to distill this into a winning policy in this year’s general election. In opposition, we must put forward and work to implement a policy on ownership which contrasts with the Tory/Lib-Dem coalition’s Age of Austerity. This involves recalling our co-operative traditions and our status as the party of labour.

A recent report by Professor Joseph Lampel & Dr Ajay Bhalla of Cass Business School, and Dr Pushkar Jha from Newcastle University Business School, looked at two hundred and fifty firms, finding that:

“the employee ownership model offers particular advantages to small and medium-sized businesses and in knowledge and skill-intensive sectors, where employee-owned companies significantly outperform competitors.”

As Professor Lampel observes:

“Resilience – the ability of firms to sustain employment and growth during difficult economic conditions – has been neglected as a crucial aspect of company performance over the past two decades.

Instead, business strategy and public policy have been dominated by an unremitting focus on maximising share value. In the current economic conditions, business leaders and policy makers should be looking again at the resilience associated with the employee ownership model – and how it could benefit the economy as a whole.”

Labour’s 2010 General Election Manifesto favoured a “step change” in the role of employee-owned companies in the economy, though how the party would actively achieve this aim was not detailed.

In government, Labour established Supporters Direct to help football fans gain a collective shareholding in their clubs. Tens of thousands of fans are now co-owners in the club they support through supporters’ trusts.

In opposition, Labour could work with the co-operative and trade union movements to establish a similar support agency to help employees in the private sector gain a collective shareholding in the firms for which they work, or help unemployed workers establish new co-owned firms in the industries of the future. As a “big idea” it is hard to oppose – the Liberal Democrats have long advocated co-ownership and with their rhetoric about “popular capitalism” the Conservatives could not object without appearing to defend vested interests.

And what would we call this policy? The “Right to Own”, of course.

Do you have an “Idea for electability”? – why not email it to us, and be part of the series.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Monday saw the first day of Committee on the Same Sex Marriage Bill, where it became clear after a three hour debate on how to distinguish Same Sex Marriage from so called “traditional” marriage that opposition to this bill has not gone away. Despite a huge defeat on Second Reading, opponents reheated and repeated their earlier speeches, in part because their arguments rely on belief and prejudice not evidence or fact. So we sat until 11pm debating conscience clauses, Registrars [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Well that was a bad PMQs for Ed Miliband – the second in a row. Perhaps he hasn’t gotten back into his stride after such a long period without the weekly Wednesday joust, but whatever it is, Miliband isn’t hitting his marks at PMQs. Meanwhile Cameron – who has been jousting with world leaders this week – seemed far more o top of his game than we’ve been used to seeing him lately. Alas the problem for Miliband was that [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Last week it was revealed that the government discussed secret plans to hike interest on pre-existing student loans, meaning that anyone with a student loan will be expected to pay far more than expected. Today, the Prime Minister was asked about this – he spoke for nearly a minute but wouldn’t answer the question. What does he have to hide? How much more does he expect graduates to pay?

    Read more →
  • Comment Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Across the industrial north, it is striking how old pit villages and industrial towns are proving far less willing to embrace renewable energy than the noisier, more polluting fossil fuels and industries which shaped their identity. Energy companies are getting a nasty shock after mistakenly believing that these communities would not bat an eyelid at a few wind turbines on the surrounding hills because they had been content to make huge slag heaps part of the landscape in decades past. [...]

    Read more →
  • News Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this (and much more) in your inbox. You can sign up here. Put reckless bankers in jail Britain’s banking bosses should face jail if their decisions force fresh bailouts, the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards says today. The commission’s hotly anticipated report urges the Chancellor, George Osborne, to oversee the [...]

    Read more →