Michael Gove: An idiot abroad

January 4, 2011 1:41 pm

ChinaBy Sonny Leong, Chair of Chinese for Labour

I am in total despair. Every time Michael Gove opens his mouth, extravagant foolishness and ignorance spews from it.

In a recent Telegraph article, he said:

“I was in the Far East last month, to see what I could learn …. where I am happy to confess I’d like us to implement a cultural revolution just like the one they’ve had in China. Like Chairman Mao, we’ve embarked on a Long March to reform our education system.”

His ignorance of history is baffling and a cause for concern. Where do we get these politicians?

The Cultural Revolution was a violent mass revolution resulting in social, political and economic upheaval with over 30 million deaths. Mao singled out his enemies – landlords, rich peasants, intellectuals. In the fight against “class enemies” and “bourgeois reactionaries,” teachers and people with college degrees were targeted. Entire schools of elite musicians and teams of athletes were sent to labour camps. Intellectuals were kept in prisons.

In the Cultural Revolution, learning was a crime. The crackdown on teachers, professors and intellectuals was particularly nasty. In secondary schools students humiliated and denounced their teachers. In high schools, teachers wore dunce caps and spent the whole day reciting “I am a demon” in front of classrooms filled with mocking students.

Is this what Gove is advocating?

If this is a case of “metaphorically speaking”, then his analogy is pure contempt for the Chinese in Britain. Many have lost relatives and family during that period in history, and many are just coming to terms with the horrific memories. The frequent usage of Chinese analogies by politicians recently is nothing short of repugnant and gut-wrenching to listen to.

Having spent only a few days in the Far East does not make Gove such an expert on education there.

Yes, teachers and students in Shanghai and Singapore have to be congratulated in coming out top in a recent global study of secondary school performance in maths and science. This is no surprise at all – to really understand why – one needs to take a closer look at the Chinese family.

The pressure on these kids to perform well comes from within the family, school and society. Chinese students work extra long hours on school days and continue to have classes at weekends and on holidays. These children are victims of a test-oriented education system. Failures in such tests bring shame to themselves and their families leading to high suicide rates.

Whether it is maths or reading, the more you practice, the better you can get. They are taught to memorise – parrot fashion – and regurgitate what they have studied for exams. Any analysis, dicussion or exploration of other concepts or ideals are alien to their learning processes.

These students fail abysmally at non-standardised tests – open-book; open-notes; Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs); and True/False assessments. Why? Because they do not know how to pass exams that they have not practiced for. Their incapability to apply knowledge acquired in a classroom to real life or non-standardised exams is a cause of concern for many parents and educators.

Students grow up lacking social interaction, interpersonal, teamwork and communicating skills because they have not been allowed to acquire or develop them. All their waking hours are spent on memorising and more memorising.

In Singapore, from the strict design of pedagogies and curriculum to the series of standardised examinations, students are moulded into productive units of labour for the future. The introduction of more testing and streaming for younger students is leading to an overheated pressure cooker further damaging their youth and future generations. The recent deaths of two junior college students have once again highlighted the primary ramification of a highly-competitive and rigid education system – tremendous stress and pressure.

Other costs worth considering is the dearth of creativity among Singaporean students and the complete lack of development of critical thinking skills among Singaporean students. They are unable to read texts critically, offer interpretations, construct good arguments or communicate clearly.

As a Chinese father, I would not be happy at all in schooling my four year old daughter in Singapore or Shanghai. I wouldn’t want my child to go through the ‘pressure cooker’ educational system where she is taught just to pass exams and incapable of any further comprehension.

We should all take pride in our schools and teachers. Yes, we need to do more to raise standards and expectations in our schools. Yes, we need to encourage our students to take up sciences. Yes, we need to invest more in our children’s future. Yes, we need educators who are motivated and yes, we need a fairer system where children have access to good schools in their communities.

To all educators, teachers, head teachers and governors out there, do not allow Michael Gove anywhere near your school. Stop this dangerous political vandalism in our school and education system, before we start counting the number of suicides amongst our children.

This article was originally posted on Left Foot Forward

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →