Vote Labour, Vote No

May 3, 2011 10:30 am

Labour NoBy Joan Ryan

The most important arguments against the Alternative Vote are ones of principle – such as the importance of keeping our ‘one person, one vote’ system rather than giving supporters of the most unpopular parties extra votes.

That said, if you believe that the Labour Party is the best vehicle for creating a fair, progressive Britain, it’s critical to say No to Clegg’s AV referendum. If AV were implemented, it would cost the Labour Party seats in most elections, make it nearly impossible for Labour to win a majority, and preserve the Tory-led coalition.

Let’s take a look at what would have happened under AV in previous elections. Because it tends to exaggerate the effect of decisive elections, under AV Labour would have gained more seats in 1997, but had even fewer seats throughout the 1980s. The party would have lost 30 or so more seats in the 1983, 1987 and 1992 elections, giving Margaret Thatcher even more power.

AV only helps Labour in elections that we would win anyway. Labour Yes supporters focus on the three elections under Blair – elections that we won under first past the post – and ignore the fact that AV would have hurt Labour in the Thatcher elections and in close elections like 1992 and 2010. As pollster Peter Kellner has said, AV ‘would have driven Labour yet further into the wilderness in 1983 and 1987′.

By contrast, the Liberal Democrats always benefit from AV. They would gain more seats under almost any scenario, and Clegg would get to play ‘kingmaker’ over and over again. In the 2010 election, for example, the Liberal Democrats would have won an extra 32 seats under AV according to the British Election Study. That’s why David Laws described the system as a ‘shield against’ their unpopularity.

The other big winners from a Yes vote will be parties like the BNP and National Front. Supporters of fringe parties will be the first – and in some cases only – people to get their vote counted again, and they’ll have more influence over the result in marginal seats than anyone else. AV may not make it more likely that the BNP will win seats, but I can guarantee that their vote share would rise and the ‘free protest vote’ afforded by the ranked choices could be the catalyst for turning them from a party which only gains recognition in proportional voting systems (the EU and GLA elections) to one that has to be pandered to at general elections.

I support the idea of uniting Britain’s progressive majority, but this dream has been shattered by Clegg’s sell-out. The Liberal Democrats could have left the Conservatives to govern alone, but instead they are supporting the most right-wing, ideological government in the post-war era, making cuts that even Thatcher would have flinched from.

If people vote No on the referendum, however, it could push this unprincipled coalition to the breaking point. Clegg’s credibility depends on a Yes vote, and voting No makes a Lib Dem leadership challenge much more likely. To quote Peter Kellner again, ‘Without AV, the Lib Dems’ prospects at the next general election could be bleak’.

A Yes vote, on the other hand, would strengthen the Lib-Con coalition. The Yes campaign has repeatedly claimed that the Labour Party would benefit from Lib Dem voters’ support under AV. Unfortunately, this is entirely mistaken: Only 16% of Lib Dems want a Labour-led government after the next election, while 51% would prefer to see David Cameron in Downing St. Since the general election, polls show that many progressive Lib Dem voters have returned to supporting Labour and the remaining Lib Dems are increasingly likely to give their second preferences to Conservatives.

As a result, AV would make it harder for Labour to win Lab-Con marginals and make gains in the south. In the 50 most marginal Conservative seats where Labour finished second in 2010, polling last summer showed that Labour would win 28 seats from the Conservatives under first past the post but only 16 under AV.

Had the last general election been held under AV, 20 current Labour MPs would not be in the House of Commons. AV would save Clegg’s skin, but that’s no reason for Labour supporters to vote for it. On the other hand, if the referendum fails, it could tear the coalition apart.

Joan Ryan is the Director of Labour NO to AV and former Labour MP for Enfield North.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →