A vision for a fairer future

June 9, 2011 10:21 am

Islington Fairness CommissionBy Andy Hull / @andyhull79

A year ago Labour List covered the start of the Islington Fairness Commission‘s work. That work culminates today in the publication of the Commission’s final report, Closing the Gap. As suggested in yesterday’s Guardian, it offers a bold action plan for building a fairer borough, which, despite its swanky image, is one of the most deprived in England, with a massive divide between rich and poor.

Chaired by Professor Richard Wilkinson, co-author of bestselling book The Spirit Level: Why Equality Is Better For Everyone, the Commission’s aim was to come up with radical ways to tackle the root causes of poverty and inequality and create a fairer borough for the benefit of all.

Now the Commission – the first of its kind in the country – is publishing its final report with 19 concrete recommendations for how to narrow Islington’s divide. It argues that all employers in Islington should pay their directly employed staff at least the London Living Wage and that this should apply to contracted staff as well wherever possible. Major employers should also publish their pay differentials to show the differences in pay between those at the top and bottom of the organisiation. To address the issue of crippling debt, the Commission recommends that the Council should look to pass a by-law to stop payday loan companies from operating in the borough as well as taking strong enforcement action with its partners against illegal loan sharks. And employers in Islington, the report contends, should do more to help support young people into training and employment, or to help them set up their own business.

As Professor Wilkinson’s renowned research demonstrates, ‘Large differences in income and wealth increase the social distances between people and add to distinctions of class and status. To want to create a classless society without reducing income differences is like wanting to get slim without reducing the calories’.

But with such wide divides between the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ – Islington has no shortage of multi-millionaires and yet half of all the borough’s children live in poverty – it will be no mean feat for Islington’s community to rise to the challenge the Commission lays down, especially against the backdrop of swingeing government cuts on an unprecedented scale. That said, inaction is not an option: our Labour Council cannot just sit back and watch as pupils from poorer backgrounds lose out to their wealthier peers by 10 percentage points in educational performance by the time that they leave primary school.

The Commission’s report, however, is where the hard work begins, not where it ends. Actually delivering meaningful and lasting change on the ground in the face of persistent problems of poverty and inequality will not be easy. But there is the political will in Islington – and not just in the Council – to make the Commission’s work real. Those who have been involved in its work will now champion it, advocate its recommendations, and do everything they can to ensure that this is one report that doesn’t just gather dust on a shelf.

Meanwhile, Fairness Commissions have now also been set up in Liverpool and in York, and discussions are under way about others being established elsewhere in the country. It should come as no surprise that people around the country are trying to rise to The Spirit Level‘s call to arms. A fairness agenda is one that speaks to core British values, felt keenly up and down the land. That’s why hundreds of local people turned up to take part in the public meetings held by the Islington Fairness Commission. Those of us who sat on it are determined not to let them down.

Councillor Andy Hull is Co-Chair of The Islington Fairness Commission

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →