The dark cloud of Fascism on Europe’s horizon

June 29, 2011 6:04 pm

swiss racist poster.jpgBy Danny Adilypour

The signs are ominous. Across Europe extremist, far-right movements are gaining increasing levels of influence based on vicious anti-immigrant and often racist platforms. In the last two Swiss federal elections, the Swiss People’s Party has gained the most votes and entered the Swiss coalition government, using campaign posters which depict white sheep kicking black sheep out of Switzerland. These election successes have been used to pursue a vicious Islamophobic agenda, which culminated in the Swiss voting to ban building of minarets on mosques in November 2009. It didn’t matter that only four minarets existed in the whole of Switzerland, to the Swiss People’s Party they were “unacceptable symbols of Islamic power”.

A similar situation has arisen in the Netherlands. Following the 2010 general election, the Dutch government now relies on the support of the Freedom Party of Geert Wilders to survive. Wilders is outspoken in his Islamophobia, campaigning for all Muslim immigration to the Netherlands to be banned and for Dutch Muslims to be paid to leave or face higher taxes. He proudly states that he “hates Islam”, considers the Koran “a fascist book” and believes Muslims should “tear out half of the Koran if they wish to stay in the Netherlands”. Worryingly many of Wilders’ hateful views go unchallenged, in part due to the government needing his support but also because many in the Netherlands fear defending Muslims would lead to electoral unpopularity.

These worrying trends are being repeated across Europe. From the Swedish far-right entering parliament for the first time on a platform stating Islam has no place in Sweden, to the Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi warning that Milan would become “an Islamic city and a Gypsy town” if the left were to govern the city. In this regard the tactics of fascists and the far-right are the same as they have been throughout history. Identify a scapegoat (in this case Muslims), blame the scapegoat for all of society’s ills and whip up fear and hatred of the scapegoat amongst the general population, in the hope that this will carry you to electoral success.

As predictable and loathsome as this tactic is, it has had depressing levels of success in Europe in recent years, with the extremist threat now looming large over next year’s French presidential election. Marine Le Pen has recently succeeded her Holocaust denying father as the leader of the Front National. Whilst she has shied away from making statements as extreme as her father, in attempt to moderate the Front National’s image, occasionally the mask has slipped. She recently compared French Muslims who have lived in France for generations to the Nazi occupation of France and has called for all French citizens of Algerian heritage to be stripped of their French citizenship if they also hold Algerian passports. Rather than challenging this Islamophobia, the French government of Nicolas Sarkozy has pandered to it with gestures such as the recent ban on Islamic face veils, even though only 2,000 women in the whole of France wear such veils. However, this pandering has backfired on Sarkozy, with Marine Le Pen’s popularity continuing to grow, culminating with her recently topping opinion polls for the French presidential election.
This is lesson that David Cameron should heed. However, his recent speech on multi-culturalism shows signs that he risks making the same mistakes as Sarkozy. As well as the timing of his speech being ill-judged, coming on the same day as an English Defence League rally against Islam, his comments are also open to dangerous misinterpretation by those with a darker agenda. By seeming to admit that multi-culturalism has failed, Cameron allows others to build on his argument and claim that all immigration to Britain has been a failure and that Islam in particular has no place in modern British society. By attacking Islamist extremist and avoiding criticism of far -right, extremist and racist extremism, Cameron risks whipping up a hysteria that will be used by others to unfairly target and stigmatise Muslims.

I do not for one second believe that David Cameron is racist or Islamophobic. However, by raising the issue of Islamism and branding multi-culturalism a failure without measuring his comments, he risks fueling a fire of hate that he will be unable to control.

Of course Islamist extremism should be exposed, challenged and defeated wherever it is found, but with a constant recognition that Islamism is a minority view opposed by the vast majority of Muslims. The real threat to our society is an extremism based on hateful, racist bigotry that seeks to tear the heart out of our society, split our communities and create false divisions between people in towns and cities across our country.

Islamophobia is the current tool of evil being used by fascists and extremists to gain support across Europe, in the same way that they have used anti-Semitism and other forms of racism in the past. In 1946, Winston Churchill warned of the Iron Curtain of totalitarian Stalinism descending across Europe. If we are not awake to the dangers posed by the advance of far right extremism across Europe, the dark cloud of a re-emergent fascism could become the modern threat to Europe’s liberty.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why Britain’s women won’t “calm down”

    Why Britain’s women won’t “calm down”

    From November 4th until the end of 2014, women across the country will effectively be working for free. The gender pay gap means that women are paid on average 15% less than their male counterparts; we have to work an extra 60 days annually to earn the same amount as a man doing the same job. For black and minority ethnic women, the pay gap is 20%. Women in Britain need a pay rise. It was heartening to see so many […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Get used to hearing a lot more of what Cameron’s Tories really think…

    Get used to hearing a lot more of what Cameron’s Tories really think…

    The revelation earlier this week that government welfare minister Lord Freud had referred to disabled people as ‘not worth the full [minimum] wage’ seemed somewhat familiar – and not only because of the Prime Minister’s repeated assertion that, when it comes to disabled people, anything his government does is above criticism. Fans of longstanding rent-a-reactionary-view Philip ‘why it is so offensive to black up your face’ Davies, Conservative MP for Shipley, will remember that he made the same point in […]

    Read more →
  • News “I rule it out”: Burnham says he won’t be making a leadership bid

    “I rule it out”: Burnham says he won’t be making a leadership bid

    Andy Burnham has been named in several newspapers lately as a possible future Labour leadership candidate, but he was keen to scotch such rumours when he appeared on Marr this morning, saying: “I rule it out… No, I am [a] Labour loyalist to my core. I am loyal to the leader, and the leader of our party, Ed Miliband, has said, the NHS will be his big priority going towards this election. I am 100% focused on developing a plan for the […]

    Read more →
  • News Tory minister: “disabled people work harder because they’re grateful to have a job”

    Tory minister: “disabled people work harder because they’re grateful to have a job”

    Tory Minister Lord Freud was put under pressure this week after he suggested that disabled people were “not worth” the minimum wage. Today another Tory Minister appears to have make similarly ill-judged (and revealing) comments about the Tory Party’s approach to disabled workers. The Independent on Sunday reports that Andrew Selous – the former parliamentary aide to Iain Duncan Smith and now a Justice Minister – told a fringe meeting: “disabled people work harder because they’re grateful to have a job”. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Our party should welcome a debate with Farage – and we can win it

    Our party should welcome a debate with Farage – and we can win it

    By James Dray and Lewis Iwu Should UKIP be part of the televised election debates? Forget for a minute the question of whether or not Farage should be entitled to be there; instead, let’s look at the real question; can we beat him? A man who significant numbers of people see the rather obvious faults of but still really rather like? A man who decimated Nick Clegg in the European debates? We think that we can, and more importantly, we […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y