In defence of James Purnell

31st July, 2011 3:00 pm

James PurnellBy Tom Harris MP / @TomHarrisMP

It’s a sign of a good politician that he can still provoke debate – even harsh criticism – more than a year after stepping down from the Commons.

But that’s what my friend and former colleague James Purnell has done, with his latest pronouncements on how we can encourage people to love the welfare state. Inevitably, as happens whenever someone on the Left says anything remotely sensible on the subject of welfare reform, he has ruffled a few feathers, specifically the feathers of Darrell Goodliffe.

Darrell wrote on LabourList that James’s suggestion that future reforms might include scrapping pensioners’ Winter Fuel Allowances, free bus passes and TV licenses weren’t just unwise or ill-considered; no, no – they were “an abomination”.

Well, good to see we’re managing to tone down the hyperbole, eh? Darrell goes on:

“No doubt he will make noises about ‘targeting’ but we all know that means testing – which is what ‘targeting’ is another word for – hits the poorest the hardest. Elderly people, children, these are our most vulnerable groups and Purnell wants to squeeze them until the pips squeak.”

You hear that, James? You want to hit old people and children. And squeeze their pips, apparently…

Darrell is missing the point, I think. Yes, means testing has a certain stigma attached to it and therefore many of those at whom a particular benefit is aimed very often don’t apply for it. But its intention is the opposite of what Darrell seems to think it is. Means testing (or “targeting”) is about making sure that those who need a benefit most – the poorest, in other words – don’t miss out on it because it makes sure that others who don’t need it – the richest – don’t get it.

A good example of this was the Pension Credit. After years of seeing British pensioners fall further into poverty under Tory governments, Labour decided that the available funds would be better spent targeting the very poorest, particularly those whose modest savings or private pensions had hitherto prevented them from receiving state assistance.

No-one thinks means testing is ideal; we all want to avoid it where possible. But the Labour government did it and it was right to do it.

Darrell’s main objection to James and everyone else who thinks we need to reform welfare is that it’s really not necessary in the grand scale of things:

“It’s demonstrably the case that the cost of benefit fraud is nothing compared to the cost of tax avoidance and tax evasion.”

Which is probably true, but completely misses the point. Even if the cost of benefit “fraud” were zero, it would still be incumbent on any government to reduce significantly the number of individuals and families dependent on benefits.

When second or third generations of families, and even whole communities, are relying on benefits rather than employment, the immediate direct cost to the Treasury is as nothing compared with the cost to those families, those communities and to wider society. The cost is not measured in pounds and pence but in aspiration, inter-generational poverty, poor performance at school, self-esteem and social breakdown.

With more than 100,000 adults of working age “economically inactive”, my own city of Glasgow is fighting to improve its prosperity with one hand tied behind its back. That is an unacceptable situation, irrespective of the cost of the benefit cheques.

That’s what James Purnell and many others in the Labour Party understand. It’s a pity Darrell Goodliffe does not.

Latest

  • News Andy Burnham: I’ll commission an urgent review into legal aid and scrap employment tribunal fees

    Andy Burnham: I’ll commission an urgent review into legal aid and scrap employment tribunal fees

    Andy Burnham will commit to reverse the declining access to legal advice for the low paid by reviewing legal aid and scrapping employment tribunal fees. The leadership contender make this announcement this week as he unveils what his team are calling “a highly personal” manifesto. This comes as figures show legal aid payments for people in debt, on benefits benefits or with employment and housing concerns fell to 10% before the Conservatives’ budget. They also showed ministers cuts £500 million from the legal aid budget […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Kendall sets out plans to deal with the five big issues Labour must prioritise

    Kendall sets out plans to deal with the five big issues Labour must prioritise

    Leadership hopeful Liz Kendall has today outlined five causes that she believes Labour must prioritise to build a fairer country. But in an article in today’s Independent, she says that the party first needs to win back the public’s trust: “Unless we can restore that, we won’t deliver on the causes we believe in.” The Leicester West MP argues that “Jeremy Corbyn doesn’t have a monopoly on hope” as she lays out five broad areas where she wants to see […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Staying together for the kids

    Staying together for the kids

    Can a political party attend relationship counselling? Never mind the big tent: how big would the couch have to be? Or is the Labour party now displaying signs of having irreconcilable differences? Is it time to cut the ties, and the losses, call it a day and move on? The abuse currently being hurled in several directions hardly points to a sense of common purpose, solidarity or collective action. The anger on social media is quite something. Dip any digit […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Having the ambition to put ending child poverty at the heart of leadership is why I’m backing Yvette

    Having the ambition to put ending child poverty at the heart of leadership is why I’m backing Yvette

    Leading the Labour Party is a big job, and it’s a serious job – that’s why we need a leader who brings strength and a track record to the role. Nobody doubts Yvette’s toughness or her experience, but what’s really important to me is the way she’s drawing on that experience to set out her stall for the future of our country and our party, and how that reflects her values. Yvette’s achievements in government, and as shadow home secretary, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured London needs a Mayor with conviction

    London needs a Mayor with conviction

    Labour supporters have a clear choice when selecting our Mayoral candidate. We can settle for mediocrity – picking a bland candidate, who won’t rock the boat and is too scared to challenge the inequality that increasingly prevents Londoners from reaching their potential. Or we can choose a conviction politician, with real Labour values – someone not afraid to stand up to the powerful and fight for social justice and equality for all Londoners. A Mayor who will deliver a new […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit