Government by gimmick

October 24, 2011 2:23 pm

Labour’s priority for the country is to get people working again and to ensure our economy is never again left so exposed. To fulfil the promise of Britain, we must also begin making a new bargain from the benefits office to the boardroom based on something-for-something values. If the government were not so out of touch they would share these priorities,  but  this weekend the Sunday Mirror reported news of a Government initiative from my opposite numbers in the Cabinet Office, which is called ‘Tell Us How’.

Apparently, Frances Maude is going to invite members of the public to make suggestions about Government policy. Of course, one’s first response to such an idea is one of vague amusement.   Given the crisis in the Eurozone and the increasing levels of unemployment in our own country, one would have thought that the British Government would be fully preoccupied with dealing with the crisis. But the truth is that the British public is more likely to make suggestions than the Coalition, who seem to have run out of ideas about how to take the country forward. As has been widely commented, Plan A is not working and yet the Prime Minister and Chancellor refuse to consider any other options.

And beyond the economy, what is striking about the Tory-led Government is the absence of a unifying narrative or ideological imperative. They are out of touch with mainstream opinion in the country and it feels like a government which is running out of steam  relatively early in the parliament.

Cabinet Office ministers are responsible, for example, for the Big Society initiative. But it is unclear whether the government regards the idea as a means of cutting back the state for ideological reasons, or simply that the decision to cut spending and hand services over to the voluntary and charitable sectors is contingent on perceived problems with the deficit. Few people believe that the details of the Tories’ Big Society idea is a convincing development which will enhance the community life of the country.

Whatever the motives, it is clear that the Coalition’s commitment to the Big Society is the point at which their communitarian aspirations are in conflict with its fiscal strategy. Everywhere you look, in every community and neighbourhood, it is the third sector which is experiencing cutbacks as severe as or more stringent than the public sector.

Little surprise therefore that in recent times the Government has abandoned almost entirely its commitment to the Big Society.

A similar vacuum lies at the heart of the Government’s ideas about public sector reform.  The Cabinet Office, for example, launched a bonfire of the quangoes with the Prime Minister promising £30billion of savings. But the truth is that far from undertaking a comprehensive and careful review of quangos, the Cabinet Office have produced a complex and ramshackle piece of legislation which the House of Lords had to drastically amend and which fails to deliver significant savings at all beyond that which Labour was already working on at the time of the election.

In the week when the House debated the Hillsborough Disaster, why on earth would any government propose to mess about with the Football Licensing Authority on the argument that it is just another quango when in fact the safety of tens of thousands of spectators in grounds across the country are at stake?

There ought to be one single, over-riding drive connecting every one of the Government’s actions. And that is to drive the country back to recovery with a programme for jobs and growth. But tragically even when it does have an economic initiative it is too little too late, such as the Regional Growth Fund, which lacks ambition and whose delivery is weak.

Perhaps however gimmicks are all that can be expected.  For the Cabinet Office is the government department which houses the Minister whose paper-recycling scheme is focused on the bin in St James’ Park.  Ideas from gimmicks all too often meet with the same fate.

Jon Trickett MP is Shadow Minister at the Cabinet Office

  • John

    I see – so can you direct me to the url of Labour policies on all these

  • Colin12598

    Completely right why are they messing about on all these issues. With nearly a million young people out of work, they should focus on the essentials

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_54OMBRHP3LUS42PB5YPHFIFA3Q LANCE

    Never had we had a so ‘out of touch’ Government who have no clue as far as sensible policies are concerned because they have no idea of how the majority of their constituents live – The Tory Ministers and their friends belong to the 1% who own the rest of us, 99%.
    One idea would have been to use the £75m Bank of England QE funds to build housing – there is a critical need for homes and this would create employment. Simples!

  • Smcconnell

    Why do people have such a problem with involving the public with policy making? Is it really best to leave these things to clueless policy wonks to then be imposed on us?

    I think its a good idea to get people involved as long as the ideas are given serious review.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jrccollier James Collier

    This is what happens when you have a political elite of whom while growing up had probably not met a person on an average wage in their lives and are now only just coming to terms with the fact that their chosen career gives them vast control over the lives of people they (up until that point) had very little to do with. At least I suppose Ralph Milliband wanted his children of which he was aware came from a privileged were sent to a comparably humble comprehensive school.

  • Franwhi

    There’s nothing wrong with Big Society thinking per se – we need much less top down government but I do agree there is an issue with generating  political narratives that reach out to people and it is infecting all three Westminster parties. The only party which has a clear and sellable narrative at the moment is the SNP in Scotland. It is a cause for real concern that in the face of unprecedented cuts and reverses in lifestyle none of the politicians who cost us so much have anything approaching a coherent narrative on the economic and social model we should be following. Nor do I think the Cameroons should be allowed to conveniently forget the Big Society commitments made no matter how hollow they really are.  Opposition politicians should be moving onto this fertile ground and calling the Cameroons to account on it and making the axiomatic arguments that every time a day centre, or library or community venue closes it is a travesty of BS principles. I’m thinking of the iconic GLC calculator which showed the unemployment rate rising under Thatcher – Let’s have a BS calculator showing how far the Govt’s policies have in fact decimated communities in contradiction to their stated BS objectives.

Latest

  • News Seats and Selections Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft has been selected by Lewisham Deptford CLP as the party’s candidate for 2015 at a selection meeting this afternoon. Here’s a brief biography: Vicky grew up in the North West in a single parent household, and was the first person in her family to go to university. She has held many positions in the party including Chair of Labour Students, has sat on the National Policy Forum and is currently a local councillor and is Chair of Lewisham [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    The Labour Party have this afternoon suspended the selection process for Falkirk, after concerns were raised about “membership recruitment”. We understand that Ed Miliband was “keen to act swiftly” as the selection process was due to formally begin on Sunday. An officer of the party – yet to be confirmed – will investigate. A Labour spokesperson told us this afternoon: “We have suspended the start of the selection process of the Falkirk parliamentary seat. Concerns have been raised about membership [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Seats and Selections Unions Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    It is interesting to see that the Labour Party is returning to the vexed issue of its parliamentary selection process. The changes may be well and good.  But maybe we should be asking a bigger question – are we  witnessing the end of working class representation in Parliament? When the Labour Party was first founded it was more simple. Then the explicit  aim was to secure working class representation, and specifically organised labour, in Parliament. Inevitably it became more complicated [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    Earlier this week we brought you a decidedly dodgy bar chart from the Tories, but it seems that they’re not the only party in Camden adopting dubious use of bar charts. Step forward Camden Lib Dems, with this classic of the dodgy Lib Dem bar chart genre (courtesy of Theo Blackwell). Even by the pretty shoddy standards of the yellows, this is a corker:   Update: Haringey Lib Dems might want to work on their bar charts  maths too (via [...]

    Read more →