Labour must view the election of police commissioners as an opportunity

November 3, 2011 3:50 pm

A year from today we will be in the throes of elections for police and crime commissioners (PCCs).

It is easy to be cynical about PCCs. Labour has spent the past 18 months opposing the very existence of the posts. Our opposition has been skilfully led by Yvette Cooper. She has pointed out every inconsistency and unnecessary expense, not least the shift of elections from May to November which has cost us all £25 million. This, you’ll recall, was because Nick Clegg fears (rightly) a Lib Dem collapse at the May local elections.

The problem is that, being in opposition, we were unable to stop the Police Reform and Social Responsibility bill being passed. For all Labour’s speeches, the police and crime commissioners will become a reality. Labour now faces the difficult gymnastics of a complete about-face. It’s not impossible: Ken Livingstone managed it over the London Mayoralty.

There was some loose talk at the time of party conference about Labour boycotting the elections, to leave the field open to ‘independent’ candidates. This is a terrible idea. It must be resisted. There’s a basic presumption that Labour should stand candidates in every democratic election. To deliberately stand aside merely boosts the anti-politics narrative that corrodes our system.  It would make it more likely for ‘independents’ from the BNP and EDL to win on small turnouts. Or even Nick Ross.

So Labour must stand serious grown-up candidates in every constabulary. The party’s NEC must draw up a selection process which engages local parties. We discussed PCC elections at our local party meeting during the week, and there was not much enthusiasm. Local CLPs should be able to make nominations, and our candidates should be selected by one-member-one-vote across the police areas. Instead of just hoping candidates should emerge, Labour should be actively recruiting candidates who share our values, and have a history in tackling crime and policing. We should select our candidates in the Spring, to allow them time to build their profiles across their areas.

The powers of the new PCCs will be wide-ranging. The police budget will be passed directly to the PCC. They will allocate resources after consulting with the police chief constable. They will monitor the performance of the police. They will appoint the chief constable. They can have them sacked. They will be scrutinised by new policing and crime panels, comprising local councillors and other co-opted members. In time, Labour should argue that a third of these new panels should be directly elected by the public, to ensure democratic accountability at this level too.

The PCC will be a significant figure in the community, with real powers to direct local policing. It won’t be a job for the faint-hearted, with reductions to budgets making tough decisions inevitable. The opportunities are huge for Labour. By embracing the new structures, Labour can be on the right side of the reform argument. It is vital that Labour does not default into a defence of the status quo against every Tory reform. Labour should be outstripping the Tories’ misguided attempts at reform of the public services with bigger, badder, bolder ideas of our own.

We have also understand, since John Smith appointed Tony Blair as shadow home secretary 20 years ago, that the voters will punish a political party perceived as soft on crime.

The Economist in May suggested that:

“The introduction of elected police commissioners, who will have the power to set policing priorities for constabularies, could single-handedly put the Tories at the vanguard of the debate on crime, casting them as champions of people power against a Labour Party who think that chief constables know best”

Labour must reverse this position as fast as possible.

We can put forward a positive message about crime reduction, tackling anti-social behaviour and support for victims. We can highlight the impact of Tory and Lib Dem cuts. We can identify new voters for Labour and rebuild our relationships with the communities who deserted us in 2010. In the places where we win, we will have Labour representation with the chance to demonstrate Labour values in action.

Labour must view the election of police commissioners as an opportunity. Our leaders need to start saying so, and swiftly.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Obviously we contest them, but they should be removed at the swiftest opportunity. I really don’t like policing being turned into a party political football

    • http://www.facebook.com/elliot.bidgood Elliot Bidgood

      I mostly agree, Mike. Certainly contest them, the consequences of leaving elected offices uncontested to the Tories would be dire. However, getting rid of them would be difficult. I don’t like the idea of them, I think they already have issues with this in America with elected local county/state law enforcement officials, where the tone of the debate is invariably very much ”I’m tough on crime, well I’m tougher on crime, well I’m even tougher on crime than that!” at the expense of other arguments. But I fear the political fallout of scrapping them, if the public get used to the idea and become supportive of it. Probably what the Tories hoped for when they introduced them

    • Sam

      The trouble is policing is a political issue. Furthermore it is on the whole party political – the difference is that elections will bring the politics out into the open and remove them from the Chief Constable. Personally, I think this is a good thing. Why should policing be the one area of the public sector that is politics free?  But there is another reason why we should support these commissioners. At present, there is no effective accountability of police forces to their communities. Police Authorities are useless. I defy anyone to name members of the local police authority and the route by which they became members (without going to the Authority website). These bodies precept community charge payers but do not consult them nor report back to them. We should be supporting this extension of democracy and accountability.

  • http://twitter.com/Newsbot9 Newsbot9

    Treat them just like the police – refuse to cooperate beyond the legal minimum.

    Labour commissioners simply empower the current police force with a legitimacy which their violence towards peaceful demonstrators doesn’t warrant.

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      When I read your posts, I don’t know which of two competing images is stronger in my mind.  Either someone repeatedly bashing their forehead into some granite, or someone shouting into the darkness.

      Either way, your views are so off the mainstream that they will not make any difference whatsoever.  Maybe you are content with that?

  • Neil

    Paul, Policing works now as it is, this frankly embarrassing, ridiculous policy that will erode and ridcule British Policing should be rolled back as soon as possible. It is an afront to sensible, professional policing overwatched by sensible, sober types. It works. Why celebratise it for glib, superficial reasons?

  • C Sarell

    As a UNISON Regional Organiser with responsibility for Police Staff, I am deeply concerned about the inaction by the Party around this issue. Police & Crime Commissioners may be a bad idea, but what would be worse is if the Tories had a clear run at them.  We need to start selecting  credible candidates quickly and preparing a manifesto that reflects Labour values and local needs.

Latest

  • Comment Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Monday saw the first day of Committee on the Same Sex Marriage Bill, where it became clear after a three hour debate on how to distinguish Same Sex Marriage from so called “traditional” marriage that opposition to this bill has not gone away. Despite a huge defeat on Second Reading, opponents reheated and repeated their earlier speeches, in part because their arguments rely on belief and prejudice not evidence or fact. So we sat until 11pm debating conscience clauses, Registrars [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Well that was a bad PMQs for Ed Miliband – the second in a row. Perhaps he hasn’t gotten back into his stride after such a long period without the weekly Wednesday joust, but whatever it is, Miliband isn’t hitting his marks at PMQs. Meanwhile Cameron – who has been jousting with world leaders this week – seemed far more o top of his game than we’ve been used to seeing him lately. Alas the problem for Miliband was that [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Last week it was revealed that the government discussed secret plans to hike interest on pre-existing student loans, meaning that anyone with a student loan will be expected to pay far more than expected. Today, the Prime Minister was asked about this – he spoke for nearly a minute but wouldn’t answer the question. What does he have to hide? How much more does he expect graduates to pay?

    Read more →
  • Comment Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Across the industrial north, it is striking how old pit villages and industrial towns are proving far less willing to embrace renewable energy than the noisier, more polluting fossil fuels and industries which shaped their identity. Energy companies are getting a nasty shock after mistakenly believing that these communities would not bat an eyelid at a few wind turbines on the surrounding hills because they had been content to make huge slag heaps part of the landscape in decades past. [...]

    Read more →
  • News Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this (and much more) in your inbox. You can sign up here. Put reckless bankers in jail Britain’s banking bosses should face jail if their decisions force fresh bailouts, the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards says today. The commission’s hotly anticipated report urges the Chancellor, George Osborne, to oversee the [...]

    Read more →