Why we should all be friends of the forces

December 1, 2011 2:35 pm

Last Tuesday I and many others packed into the Shadow Cabinet room alongside veterans and the Shadow Defence team to witness the launch of Labour Friends of the Forces (LFotF). Quite beyond simply offering service men and women party membership for £1 or engaging better with their families, LFotF represents an important cultural shift in how we
as a party engage with and think about the military.

At the launch former paratrooper and LFotF patron, Dan Jarvis MP, spoke of the need to bust ‘…the myth that…the Tories were the party of defence’. I feel that there is another even more important myth to bust, that Labour and Labour values are somehow incompatible with our military and those that serve. As someone who considers himself on the
moderate left of the party I don’t see LFotF as a shift to the right, but actually an affirmation of core Labour principles.

In a post-Thatcherite age of unashamed, and often selfish, individualism what can be more commendable than the doctrine of ‘service before self’ – indeed, dare I say the ‘s’ word – what can be more socialist than putting society and the greater good before one’s own wellbeing? Labour values of community and public service seem far more compatible with our troops’ ethos than the dog-eat-dog, ‘put yourself first’ culture that is so ingrained in Tory policy.

Just as the Tories are letting down our emergency services and schools, so too are they damaging our military. Nurses, policemen, teachers and soldiers are all bearing the brunt of cuts that, not only show a lack of appreciation for their service, but damage the very fabric of our society. Labour members must show our forces the same solidarity we show other public sector workers.

We knew the Coalition would come after the schools and hospitals so in some ways the treatment of our forces seems worse given the Tory claims to be their natural friend.

Some friend: 17,000 service men and women are to lose their jobs by 2015. An extra 5,000 soldiers face coming back from Afghanistan to find they have been made redundant. A number of RAF personnel supporting the NATO mission in Libya were informed of their redundancy there and then. A leaked MoD memo revealed disgusting plans to sack those who had
returned from war injured or disabled. Within the last week the Coalition has only just u-turned on the decision to axe the chief coroner after a relentless campaign from the Royal British Legion and the Labour Party.

We have aircraft carriers without aircraft, a navy that can no longer defend our seas and an army that will be at its smallest in over a century. Little wonder RUSI stated that our military capability has been seriously compromised. But to top it all, like many of the Coalition’s austerity measures, the military cuts aren’t even cost effective. Cuts
have led to an increase in spending for military equipment projects by £466M. It’s hurting but it isn’t even close to working.

Liam Fox clearly had other things on his mind than the welfare of our troops or the UK’s ability to protect itself. Philip Hammond is proving equally lacklustre.

Labour, with its plans for sensible spending but commitment to public services should be the natural home for our forces. The Tories have treated those that serve us best the worst; from our military to our NHS. We are the natural party for the latter, let’s endeavour to be so for the former as well.

Some associate a support for military personnel as a support for militarism. But a commitment to our troops is no
more a commitment to MoD policy than our support of nurses is for Lansley’s NHS plans. I was steadfastly against the Iraq War yet have nothing but respect for our troops who had no choice but to serve. Blame government for military mistakes, but don’t blame the forces for doing their duty. At the launch I met with soldiers who were Labour to
their core yet had been made to feel unwelcome by some in the party. This cannot continue. One can be pro-service without being pro-war. Supporters and detractors of individual wars, or even war in general should be able to join LFotF in good conscience.

Remember also, the make-up of so many of our forces. The countless ordinary soldiers and sailors who hail from working class backgrounds, solid Labour families and constituencies that remain consistently loyal to the party. It is time to show them that the party is grateful for their service and grateful to the families of those who have made the
ultimate sacrifice. How many others are there who agree with so much of what Labour stands for yet feel we are not a party that is comfortable with them, a party that cannot say thank you. It is critical that now the Tory myth has been exposed Labour proves itself to be a true friend to the forces. Voters should know that the Conservatives are the party that cannot be trusted with the welfare of our troops or the security of our country.

All wings of the party should feel at ease in affirming themselves as members of Labour Friends of the Forces. Just as I stand in solidarity with the unions so too do I with our troops. My own Labour values were critical in my decision to begin the process of joining the Territorial Army. When the time comes I hope I can serve my country with the same devotion to duty that our troops have consistently shown. A devotion to duty that is not at odds with the culture and core beliefs of our party but far rather reflects the same sense of service and community that has marked our movement for over one hundred years. Everyone in Labour should be a friend of the forces.

  • Bill Lockhart

    Who was the party in government when the aircraft carrier orders were rammed through without regard to cost or military need in order to benefit the Rosyth dockyard, next door to Gordon Brown’s constituency?

    Who was the party in governnment when essential kit aquisition for Iraq 2 was forbidden so that  Tony Blair could pretend to his leftist back-benchers that he wasn’t preparing to go to war? How many British service people lost their lives in Iraq as a result of body armour and other shortages in consequence of Blair’s politicking? Sgt Steve Roberts certainly did.

    Who was the party in government when Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown slashed the helicopter budget? How many British service people lost their lives in Afghanistan in IED attacks on soft-skinned vehicles because helicopters had not been ordered and were therefore not available?

    The appropriate line-to-take  from Labour on the subjects of defence and service personnel is humble contrition.

    • Anonymous

      And now severely disabled military personal are having to go through Labours welfare and workfare, now they are out of power Labour  friends of the military.

      We love to think of our  dead as hero’s , for a long time of course we  just allowed our  injured to struggle as they are to day.

  • http://twitter.com/kulgancrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    By the number of Defence Secretaries Labour went through even one Job-Sharing shows how badly Labour treated the Forces.  During the Labour years for some time,  I worked in the Defence Crisis Management Centre (DCMC) which is the Bunker under the MoD and worked very closely with the military/political link seeing first hand Labour’s relationship with the Forces.

    From experience, I can categorically say that Labour is NOT the friends of the Forces.

  • Labour activist

    I fully support our troops and the job they do, but I believe that the soldiers should be steadily withdrawn from Afghanistan and hopefully not deployed elsewhere in the near future. You talk of us having the smallest army in a century as a bad thing, it is not. We no longer have an empire to defend, or world wars to fight that will require vast commitments of ground troops. I accept however that if we ask our troops to serve abroad, they should be given full and proper equipment and support and that is something that sometimes Labour failed to do. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    There is also a pacifist tradition within the left, and that makes it very hard to be a ‘friend’ of the forces. I certainly think that there are real issues about the difficulties service people face when they leave the forces and of course we should be prepared to deal with those

    However, I generally think we should spend as little as possible on defence and I didn’t support any of the recent conflicts. Thus I don’t find it possible to say I support what I don’t agree with.

Latest

  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    The Labour Party have this afternoon suspended the selection process for Falkirk, after concerns were raised about “membership recruitment”. We understand that Ed Miliband was “keen to act swiftly” as the selection process was due to formally begin on Sunday. An officer of the party – yet to be confirmed – will investigate. A Labour spokesperson told us this afternoon: “We have suspended the start of the selection process of the Falkirk parliamentary seat. Concerns have been raised about membership [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Seats and Selections Unions Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    It is interesting to see that the Labour Party is returning to the vexed issue of its parliamentary selection process. The changes may be well and good.  But maybe we should be asking a bigger question – are we  witnessing the end of working class representation in Parliament? When the Labour Party was first founded it was more simple. Then the explicit  aim was to secure working class representation, and specifically organised labour, in Parliament. Inevitably it became more complicated [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    Earlier this week we brought you a decidedly dodgy bar chart from the Tories, but it seems that they’re not the only party in Camden adopting dubious use of bar charts. Step forward Camden Lib Dems, with this classic of the dodgy Lib Dem bar chart genre (courtesy of Theo Blackwell). Even by the pretty shoddy standards of the yellows, this is a corker:   Update: Haringey Lib Dems might want to work on their bar charts  maths too (via [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Modern life is rubbish – We need to put Work and Home at the heart of everything we do

    Modern life is rubbish – We need to put Work and Home at the heart of everything we do

    “Work and home is what One Nation is about – family life, how people live everyday life.” That’s what Jon Cruddas – the man who will in all likelihood write Labour’s next manifesto – told the Guardian the party’s policy review is focused on. And it sounds so simple – doesn’t it? Critics will say it’s too simplistic a definition (and they’d be right – I’m cherry picking here), but it’s also a brilliant example of the distance between most [...]

    Read more →