A Memo for Tim Livesey

January 29, 2012 12:03 pm

I don’t have a great track record of memo-writing. Peter Mandelson once walked into Downing Street and a snapper caught a memo I had written about Labour’s attack strategy in his bundle of papers. Then, last year, a memo for Ed Miliband ahead of his first Prime Minister’s Questions that I had co-authored appeared in The Times (£). So consider this a pre-leak: what I would tell Ed Miliband’s new Chief of Staff, Tim Livesey, in the unlikely event that he asked…

Dear Tim

Congratulations on the appointment, below are a few thoughts on how you might approach the job once you’ve got your feet under the desk.

Running Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition is incredibly easy to do passably but very hard to do well.

For the most part, the Labour Party will be happy if you keep the ship afloat: get through the week with a bit of coverage, some attacks on the Tories, pay everyone’s wages and help Ed turn in a good performance at PMQs. The problem is that each week survived isn’t a week closer to victory, it’s another week less to complete the huge task of convincing the public that Labour deserves to govern again.

If you’re to be Mister “We’re-Not-Just-Here-to-Get-Through-the-Week” you need authority with the shadow cabinet, with MPs, the unions, and the officials and advisers you will be leading.

To get that authority, you need to tell people that Labour are sleepwalking toward defeat (even if you personally think it isn’t quite as bad as that). There’s no real need for you if the Luke Akehurst thesis – that everything would be fine were it not for all the people saying it isn’t – is true. But if you are coming in to solve a problem then suddenly acquire a purpose.

That purpose should mean every adviser, even every Shadow Cabinet member, feels that their careers are in your hands, not in Ed’s. That way, Ed can use his famous ability to get along with everyone but without creating the kind of competitions for his affection that make it hard to face up to the problems or tempt people into cop-outs like blaming the media or invisible Blairite saboteurs.

You are arriving as someone who has worked at the heart of Government but without a long history in Labour politics. If there is no sense of crisis, there will be pressure for you to stay up on the bridge and keep your nose out of the political engine-room: things like whipping, MP’s expenses, the NEC or relations with the unions.

Don’t. If you do, you’ll always be being told what’s possible and what isn’t and you will never be able to tell good political intelligence from just being advised to take the path of least resistance.

Instead, try and maximise the advantage of being an outsider. You can be the one who asks the question that no one who wants to be a Parliamentary candidate is going to ask: should we really be supporting this candidate for a seat if we don’t rate him, just because he’s mates with such-and-such? Are we sure it is wise to be running a London Mayoral candidate who appears to have learnt so little since he lost an election four years ago? Do we really have to keep pretending that if Party Conference votes for something he disagrees with, Ed would meekly carry it out if he became Prime Minister?

Finally, remember that you have a unique challenge that no previous Labour chief of staff can advise you on: you are working for a man who himself was a very senior and highly rated adviser until relatively recently. You will have to rely on his experience in one crucial area – he is one of a handful of people in the office to have worked in the higher echelons of a General Election campaign and the only person in the office who has worked near the top of a campaign that won.

But it will always bias him towards thinking that he should personally be involved in every decision, that he should decide who is in the room and who isn’t and that if he only had a few more Ed Milibands on his staff, his problems would be solved. He needs to consciously give you space to have authority over his closest and oldest advisers and, ultimately, over his own day to day activities.

The next year is set to be a rough one but let other people worry about how to get through it. The Government has many more things to worry about on a day to day basis. If you can get to the end of this year and say, “in the last year I have spent more time worrying about May 7th 2015 than George Osborne has”, then you’ll have done the Labour Party a powerful service.

Yours

Steve Van Riel
Centreground Political Communications

This post first appeared at TheCentregound.com

  • Anonymous


     cop-outs like blaming the media or invisible Blairite saboteurs.”

    I don’t think the Blairite saboteurs are invisible, perhaps just slighted masked, lurking about in the shadows ready to pounce.

     You allow yourself a little snigger as Hopi Sen has a go at Owen Jones. You take an oblique swipe at Ken Livingstone (“Are we sure it is wise to be running a London Mayoral candidate who appears to have learnt so little since he lost an election four years ago?”), conveniently forgetting that when the New Labour project was beginning to leave the rails, Livingstone actually increased his support. Perhaps we should have got Tom McNulty or James Purnell to stand instead?. After all they are “purer than pure”

    • Anonymous

      Spin doctors boy can they spin, sometimes they go so fast they are not sure where they are.

      Some will say Luke is a changed man  he has found his socialism, me I guess it’s just another step on the ladder to a nice little job, sadly Bozier fell off the bottom rung.

      But I guess most politicians swing one way or the other, blue, Red, Pink Purple, Black.

      Never mind if you keep the public confused they might never guess your all in it for the money.

    • Anonymous

      Spin doctors boy can they spin, sometimes they go so fast they are not sure where they are.

      Some will say Luke is a changed man  he has found his socialism, me I guess it’s just another step on the ladder to a nice little job, sadly Bozier fell off the bottom rung.

      But I guess most politicians swing one way or the other, blue, Red, Pink Purple, Black.

      Never mind if you keep the public confused they might never guess your all in it for the money.

    • http://twitter.com/_DaveTalbot David Talbot

      “conveniently forgetting that when the New Labour project was beginning to leave the rails, Livingstone actually increased his support”
      Non sequitur. He still lost. And, even with the narrowing of the polls, he still lags behind Labour’s polling in London.

      • http://twitter.com/gonzozzz dave stone

        Any chance you could link to the polling you cite – would be interesting to see how support for Labour is separated from support for Ken.
        Thanks.

  • Daniel Speight

    invisible Blairite saboteurs

    Maybe not that invisible?

  • Anonymous

    I’m afraid I don’t go along with the tone or assumptions made by this article- sorry.

    It’s interesting, but almost has a mechanistic feel to approach- more like
    a game of chess than a human process? (Probably elements of both involved.)

    Also disagree entirely about points made re history of media bias
    and apparent “factions” within the party- not helping process in any way
    towards possible success or development of movement beyond
    the old ways of doing things?

    Also, personally I find Luke Akehurst’s analysis as someone deeply involved
    on the ground very convincing and balanced, as I have done over
    people such as Sarah Hayward, Clare Spencer, Grace FH and others
    in local government.

    It’s that pragmatic and practical approach, constantly involved
    with the public and issues on the ground that will keep those within
    Westminster bubble and “pundit” circles- connected, and not too lofty.

    Also, I think everyone, from grassroots and public domain are entitled
    to add input and ideas- it is not the preserve of any one group or “expertise.”
    We are all capable of observation and opinion; the more involved,
    the more productive I think.

    Am just thinking a bit wider on this, if that’s OK.

    Thanks, Jo.

  • TomFairfax

    Mr van Riel,
    This article merely confirms that the people within the Westminster village haven’t a clue.

    It’s a bit hit and miss. Some of your points good, some just plain silly.

    ‘To get that authority, you need to tell people that Labour are
    sleepwalking toward defeat (even if you personally think it isn’t quite
    as bad as that)’

    Of course. Because if they don’t think it’s true they’ll change their mind because Tim Livesey tells them (irony intended). This smacks of ordering the staff to move imaginary formations around the map to stop the Russian’s reaching Berlin.

    First point. You can’t make people believe something, but they can make them act on what they believe and can see is true and effective in moving towards the common goal.

    Frankly, along with seemingly the bulk of the country, I have little respect for the mental faculties of the political class.

    I actually believe the drifting to defeat bit, but I’d rather categorise it as a headlong rush.

    Mr Livesey will get success by being given the backing of his boss to bang heads together and doing a Malcolm Tucker whilst the politicos try and remember what it is to come up with policies that appeal to the country, but which aren’t so in tune with the Coalition’s outlook that they are all promptly pinched.

    It’s good to say occasionally that something was our idea and it’s not been implemented in the way we wanted. i.e. limiting crony capitalism, by changing the make up of remuneration committees. As opposed to entrenching it in law by giving fund managers holding the bulk of shares the right to not scratch the backs of the guys deciding their own remuneration. Not a peep against it whilst the Tories were scoffing at the dangers of worker representatives. Possibly because that might have actually resulted in a perceptible effect.

    The Coalition might as well have announced an intention to outsource prison management to the Krays.

  • Anonymous

    About Mr Livesey (courtesy The Guardian)
     

    “Livesey, 52, joins Miliband’s team from Lambeth Palace, where he has served the Archbishop of Canterbury for the past six years, first as secretary for public affairs and then as adviser for international affairs – at first sight, an unusual posting for a Roman Catholic.
    Before that, Livesey fulfilled a similar role for two years for the then English leader of his own faith, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, across the river at Westminster Cathedral.
    He got on well with both men, but his career has been more than one mired in religious affairs. He was a career diplomat and assistant press officer in Downing Street under Campbell, without too obviously getting out the rosary beads.”
     
    He’s tried it all hasn’t he? God (Anglician Archbishop of Canterbury  plus detour into Catholicism – he was going to try the chief Rabbi but he wasn’t cut out for it) and Mammon in the shape of Alistair Campbell, and a career diplomat.
     
    Well, if it does’nt work out I hear McDonalds are looking for management trainees. Let’s hope for Ed Miliband it does work out.

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →