“Ditch the dirty tricks” writes Ken in letter to Boris

January 26, 2012 1:10 pm

Following from yesterday’s false claims about Ken Livingstone’s running mate Val Shawcross – branded “desperate lies” – Livingstone has written to his opponent in May’s mayoral contest and called on him to “ditch the dirty tricks”:

Dear Boris,

There can be little doubt that the mayoral election has changed recently. Far from being the re-coronation you once hoped this contest would be, it’s now accepted that the race will be closely fought.

Even some of your own Tory supporters have started complaining that you got complacent and had started taking London voters for granted.

But no one could have expected that you would react so badly to a little bit of pressure. Suddenly the Conservative party in London is flailing around and lashing out. David Cameron has told you to raise your game. And you, in turn, seem to be getting pushed around by your campaign manager, Lynton Crosby.

It has not taken much for your party to turn to the dark side.

Some of us remember how Mr Crosby tried to import his nasty “dog whistle politics” when Michael Howard was leader of the Conservative Party in 2005.

In Australia, he had helped conservatives win with tactics that included making false claims about refugees throwing their children out of boats.

And now he’s at it again.

At least, I assume it’s him because you used to have something more interesting to say than resort to cheap insults.

But on fares, the issue on which you’ve had a few wobbles lately, you’re calling me a liar.

The new lines on fares your campaign staff have put in your mouth don’t even make sense. You cannot claim that a fares cut would lead to cuts in investment or cuts to services when your own staff have been briefing that this year’s excess fares revenue has been used to pay down debt. You know the money is there to cut fares and make London a bit fairer. You just don’t want to do it.

Yesterday your campaign chief Lynton Crosby got caught doing what he does best. He issued the false claim that my running mate was proposing a council tax rise. Later there was more nastiness as a Tory AM and Tory MP bizarrely claimed I will reverse the alcohol ban on public transport. Let me be clear – both these claims are total nonsense.

Come on Boris, this isn’t you. You no longer seem to be speaking for yourself. Where has the Boris Johnson who could always be relied upon to make us smile (if not govern competently) gone? Don’t let Lynton Crosby tell you what to do. Be your own man.

Let’s try to keep this election clean.

Ditch the dirty tricks – and have a debate with me on the fares issue so people can make up their minds.

Yours

Ken Livingstone

  • JC

    These dirty tricks being what? Picturing someone as a pickpocket? Following him around with someone dressed as a chicken?

    • http://twitter.com/gonzozzz dave stone

      One dirty trick is the false claim that Val Shawcross is proposing council tax increases.

      But I suppose as Boris’s campaign deteriorates his desperation will rise. Just like Cameron’s  hysteria rising as he drives the economy into a slow-motion crash.

      Hate to think what it must be like in Boris’s campaign bunker, probably like Fawlty Towers, people running about with clip-boards shouting: “Whatever you do, don’t mention the fare increases!”

    • John Ruddy

      I think the chicken stunt was a mistake. That sort of thing only works when you re-inforce peoples views – it cant change them.

      It should be done when Ken has a decisive, consistent lead in the polls and Boris has come out and said quite clearly he wont have a debate with Ken. Before that point, I think it may be counter-productive.

  • Anonymous

    Hilarious from Mr Livingstone. He maintains that “You know the money is there to cut fares and make London a bit fairer. You just don’t want to do it.”

    This is, of course, nonsense, as Channel 4 explain here: http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/can-ken-livingstone-deliver-a-fare-deal-for-london/9186

    Their conclusion is:

    Mr Livingstone is wrong to claim there’s a £729m surplus, and there is no separate budget for investment projects. If he cuts fares, TfL expects to lose £1.12bn in income from fares – and that’s a hole he wouldn’t be able to plug without hitting the day-to-day funding for London’s transport or taking money from investment projects.
    How he’d do that is up to him, but it could mean that tube and bus route upgrades are delayed, or TfL could be forced to shed some staff members.
    Any mayoral candidate can raid the TfL’s coffers to cut fares. But cutting fares could mean cutting investment – which London’s transport system has been sorely starved of for decades. Investing money to bring it up to speed only began in earnest under the last Labour government.
    And even now, Prof Travers said the system needs “billions and billions more money” to update it. “The underground still has bits of Bakelite signalling – stuff that would easily be more at home in a science museum,” he told us.
    One way round it, would be to ask central government for more money, which Mr Livingstone did manage when Labour was in power. Prof Glaister said: ‘Ken in the past has had success blagging more money out of the government, but getting more from the current government looks entirely unlikely.’”

    A dodgy prospectus, I fear.

Latest

  • News More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    Ed Miliband is addressing Google’s Bug Tent tomorrow, and is expected to attack them over tax avoidance. So the slick Downing Street operation presumably want to get out ahead of that, right? Not quite. Here’s a selection of the headlines from today’s papers: ‘Stop moralising about tax avoidance, PM told’ – Guardian p.23 ‘Tougher tax rules would cost jobs, minister warns’ – Financial Times p.3 ‘Cameron avoids showdown over Google tax row’ – Times p.15 ‘No taxing questions as PM [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →