Labour Europhiles should support a referendum on the EU

January 30, 2012 10:33 am

Why should Labour Europhiles support the People’s Pledge, the campaign for an EU referendum? Isn’t the demand for a referendum synonymous with the demands of the Tory hard right, those who want to leave the EU? Well, no. There are plenty of good reasons why Labour Europhiles should support a referendum.

Strategically, Britain would disappear between the cracks of the massive global blocks of the USA, China, Russia, Brazil, India, and Europe itself if we were ever rash enough to leave it. Economically, it would be madness to turn our backs on a €10 trillion market with 500 million people in it. Environmentally, effective action against climate change is only possible in supranational collaboration. Politically, we have enjoyed peace in Western Europe for nearly 70 years and our ever-closer union makes the biggest contribution to that peace. The key to our future success is to hug the Germans and French close, in the room negotiating our future, not outside ear pressed to the door where Cameron’s recent arrogant and incompetent posturing has forced us.

Coverage of Europe for the last 20 years has been dominated by the Eurosceptic right. It has created a false sense of grievance about our lot while the case for Europe has barely been put; no-one felt the need. It has been near universally accepted that the benefits greatly outweighed any burden. Until now. With a genuine Eurosceptic in No10, albeit one constrained by the Liberals, the threat of separationism is mounting. It is not made any easier by the rise of Alex Salmond’s Scottish separatism.

The objective of the People’s Pledge is to secure a referendum of the people to decide whether the United Kingdom should remain a member of the European Union. A referendum will require a Referendum Act; that will require a government Bill which, to succeed on an issue as momentous as this, will require a fair degree of confidence that the issue can be multi-partisan.

Our task, therefore, is to rise above all the politics with this clean, simple message: “whatever your politics, whatever you think of Europe, whatever you think our relationship with our fellow European nations is to be, the British people should decide, for themselves, what that is.”

The People’s Pledge will employ a twin track strategy of collateral, mutually assisting strands. The first strand is a high-level Westminster-based endorsement campaign, already underway, to build a coalition of credibility across the political parties and across the Euro spectrum. 64 Members of Parliament are signed up already. I expect the centre of gravity, currently clearly Eurosceptic, to move as more and more pro-Europe MPs come out for a referendum.

Our second track is a grassroots campaign to persuade people in massed numbers to sign the People’s Pledge. So far, nationally, they number about 90,000. That is a very good start given we have barely begun and provides a ready activist base and many fundraising opportunities.

In order for public pressure for a referendum to have a meaningful effect in manifestos and candidate lists at the next election, we need to create a groundswell so that the number of signatories grows exponentially.

Politicians are much more likely to come out in support of a referendum if they feel a groundswell of people signing the Pledge; potential signatories are more likely to sign the more politicians they see with whom they identify among the ranks of People’s Pledge supporters.

Today, we start the largest-ever ground campaign for an EU referendum. We will start by holding a first local referendum in one carefully chosen constituency now, followed by a further 10 later this year and then, a further 100 in 2013.

To ensure full independence Electoral Reform Services Ltd will administer the referendums by full postal ballot. In this way, the electors themselves can pressure Members of Parliament, their local challengers and all their political parties for a referendum in the next parliament.

Polls will close for that first referendum at 5pm on Thursday 5 April 2012 as the climax of a full by-election style campaign. It will involve a high visibility local shop front headquarters, door-to-door canvassing, posters and other external media, several leaflet drops, street stalls, public meetings and other events.

The first constituency will be chosen next week from a shortlist of 13: Belfast East, Bolton West, Carlshalton and Wallington, Corby, Easington, Eastleigh, Gower, Halifax, Ipswich, Newcastle-under-Lyme, Thurrock, Torridge and West Devon, Western Isles.

Selection for the next Ten will be in late May or June for a polling day in the Autumn. The Ten will be a mixture of Tory, Liberal and Labour seats with different parties in the challenging position and again having regard to geography and the politics of both the sitting MP and the challengers.

I believe that these first 11 results will give us substantial clout in our lobbying at Westminster. That will make for a very interesting winter as we prepare for the next 100 referendums in 2013.

The last reason for a Labour Europhile to support a referendum is highly political: Cameron is pulled between the Liberals in his coalition and his Tory Eurosceptic right. Labour coming out now for a referendum in the next parliament would rip him down the middle.

So, sign up now for a referendum on our membership of the EU at www.peoplespledge.org.

Ian McKenzie is the Director of Communications for People’s Pledge

  • Anonymous

    I’m surprised the People’s Pledge is using Electoral Reform Services Ltd. 

    http://www.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/6727833/exclusive-what-the-yes-to-av-campaign-doesnt-want-you-to-know.thtml

  • Anonymous

    “Politically, we have enjoyed peace in Western Europe for nearly 70 years and our ever-closer union makes the biggest contribution to that peace”

    Since the end of the Cold War this may be true but the presence of the missiles, tanks and troops of the USA and USSR was what kept the peace before then. Claims that the EU has been responsible for 70 years of intra-Europe peace are a recurring yet fraudulent claim.

    “…while the case for Europe has barely been put..”

    100% agree.

    This is a very, very interesting project.

    This will also require the pro-EU side to be honest and admit that the plan is for a fully federal EU state. This is plain and clear and this goal has been reiterated by Merkel recently and many others for many years. Only when the pro-EU side is honest enough to admit this, will they be treating the electorate properly and openly. Any more denials that this is not the case will continue to be treated with the contempt they deserve and deliver the anti-EU side more ammunition.

  • David Boothroyd

    I’ve been warm to the idea of a referendum on British membership of the European Union, but what I could never bring myself to do is to endorse the People’s Pledge, because all of their five key points for why to support one are either wrong or misleading.

    Key point 1 (that no-one too young to vote in 1975 has had a chance to vote) is wrong because opponents of membership could present their case at any of the eight general elections since then. Since 1997 there has also been the opportunity to vote for parties concentrating on the issue. 

    Key point 2 (that the EU makes a majority of laws) is wrong. See Channel 4 Factcheck http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/is-most-of-the-uks-law-made-in-brussels/1498 or Fullfact http://fullfact.org/factchecks/proportion_of_uk_law_made_by_eu-3073 or listen to More or Less http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/more_or_less/8201615.stm . It’s also misleading – what do the number of laws have to do with the impact? If Britain had 10,000 laws from the EU governing how to sell aubergines, and one law of its own devising requiring written permission before putting one foot in front of another, then it’s fairly clear that the one has far more impact than the 10,000.

    Key point 3 (about the proportion of the vote in the Council of Ministers) is misleading because it doesn’t make any case for the UK being treated unfairly.

    Key point 4 (the EU is costing Britain more) is misleading because it fails to give the other side and talk about benefits from being part of the EU.

    Key point 5 (the EU wants to have economic powers) is written so generally it is difficult to find what it refers to specifically, but it is highly likely that the UK would not be covered by any economic governance powers because it is not part of the Eurozone. 

    • Anonymous

      opponents of membership could present their case at any of the eight general elections since then

      Not so. There are too many issues lumped in with the EU at election time. All three parties have avoided any debate on the subject.

      In any case, the EU question is a monumental constitutional issue involving our very democracy, liberty and self-determination – and should not be lumped in with bread and butter domestic issues.

      Will the People’s Pledge referendums receive TV coverage during the run-up to voting and after? If the BBC won’t play ball, will the People’s Pledge consider getting RT and other broadcasters on board, as well as ensuring that the populace will be made fully aware of how they can follow the proceedings?

  • Anonymous

    ‘Strategically, Britain would disappear between the cracks of the massive
    global blocks of the USA, China, Russia, Brazil, India, and Europe
    itself if we were ever rash enough to leave it. Economically, it would
    be madness to turn our backs on a €10 trillion market with 500 million
    people in it’
    So are you seriously saying that leaving the EU would mean we couldnt trade with the EU ? You must be bonkers , we trade with nearly every nation in the world , without paying £50million a day for the privilege , and trading with the EU would be no different .

  • Anonymous

    You are right about the headline and wrong about everything else

Latest

  • Featured I Agree with Jack, End EU Elections

    I Agree with Jack, End EU Elections

    I agree with Jack Straw. EU parliamentary elections should be abolished. It’s not that we object to democracy, it’s that we object to failed democracy. We object to democracy that continues to exist as a pointless halfway-house absorbing considerable revenue without delivering anything in return. “The directly elected European parliament should be abolished after failing to achieve its purpose of bridging the divide between the European people and the European Union” is what Jack actually said at the recent IPPR event. [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Why are we losing police officers? asks MP

    Why are we losing police officers? asks MP

    Mp Clive Betts put Cameron on the spot over policing at PMQs, but do his arguments on “visible policing” really stack up? Watch their exchange and see for yourself:

    Read more →
  • News Gordon Brown slams Greek bailout – and warns Europe over austerity

    Gordon Brown slams Greek bailout – and warns Europe over austerity

    In an article for the Washington Post entitled “Europe’s shortsighted response to a worsening fiscal reality“, Gordon Brown has hit out at German-led austerity in Europe, lambasting: “policies that the whole world can see have already failed.” In fact, Brown goes further still in tackling head on the central argument around austerity – that any failings that arise from austerity are because there isn’t enough austerity: “the unfolding tragedy of a bankrupt Greece is only a symptom of an even [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured PMQs verdict: How could anyone have “won” something as dreadful as that?

    PMQs verdict: How could anyone have “won” something as dreadful as that?

    So much of the coverage of PMQs is focussed on the snap verdict. Who won? Who lost? I’m aware that this blog is as guilty as anyone for playing that game. So let’s make this one simple – nobody won today. How could they have, when the event itself was so deeply, stunningly, mind bendingly dreadful. It started off relatively normal. Loud admittedly, but normal. Ed began with the NHS. Still normal. Cameron dodged the question. Still supremely normal. But something [...]

    Read more →
  • News David Davis launches a scathing attack on the government’s close relationship with big business

    David Davis launches a scathing attack on the government’s close relationship with big business

    David Davis has launched a broadside against the PM – and especially the government’s relationship with big business (or “crony capitalism” as he calls it) – in an interview with Prospect Magazine. The former leadership challenger (who lost out to Cameron in 2005) has spoken out against the government’s handling of Hester’s RBS bonus, tax avoidance and the media. Interestingly, the quotes have come to light on the same day as fellow Tory right big hitter Liam Fox returns to the [...]

    Read more →