No money left

11th January, 2012 6:13 pm

Over the last week, we’ve posted a series on articles taking at look at what Labour’s about “When there’s no money left” (or WTNML for short). As I wrote before Christmas:

“In addition to thinking beyond narrow alleyways of thinking on spending and the state, we’ll also need to think beyond narrow areas in which and means by which the state can operate. We think that these kind of changes in society are not only possible, but necessary, and must form part of Labour’s next manifesto…We can’t wait until the next election to develop these ideas – we need to start now, shape the debate, and make such ideas as mainstream as the minimum wage.”

Now it’s time for you to tell us what you think of the top four proposals. Those proposals are:

– Publish all income tax details

– Encourage more people to join trade unions

– Carbon Intensity scores for energy producers

– A progressive constitution

Voting is open for the next twenty four hours, and we’ll be announcing the winner tomorrow evening. That winner will be proposing their idea for what Labour should be about “when there’s no money left” at the Fabian Society conference. There are only 30 tickets left (at the time of writing), but there are still afternoon tickets available (when you can see the Dragon’s Den).

But as we’re a generous bunch, if you vote for your favourite policy idea in our survey then you’ll have a chance of winning a pair of free tickets for Saturday’s conference.

Vote now for your chance to win, and to help keep Labour setting the agenda in the Labour Party

I hope to see some of you at Saturday’s conference

  • Anonymous

    Sorry but all those ideas are terrible. How about this as a starting point instead?: http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/gavin-kelly/2012/01/labour-tax-spending-deficit

  • Anonymous

    How do any of these things improve my life, they just intrude more into others privacy.
    Is this really all the left has?

  • Anonymous

    Mark

    I know you have worked through this process very thoroughly, but these are the kind of small-scale, non-game-changing ideas you have criticised Ed for recently. This is the stuff of political nerds with no impact on the core vote.

    And for goodness sake, where is Labour’s commitment to the NHS? Here’s a simple WTNML commitment:

    Labour committ to reverse the Coalition’s plan to allow your local hospital to raise 49% of its revenues treating private patients, instead of the the 2% allowed today.

    Have we completely given up on the NHS? It seems like it.

  • Chris Cook

    Good grief, Mark.

    If  those are the top four, what are the rest like?

    There appears to be a form of policy paralysis here: Labour is like a rabbit in the Coalition’s headlights.

  • Daniel Speight

    Mark I hate to join the pool of criticism but this is rather disappointing. I suspect it does place the Fabian Society exactly where it’s at right now. I’m trying to think of something good to say, but I can’t.

  • Anonymous

    It’s going to be a long hard few years I think,

    • Anonymous


      It’s going to be a long hard few years I think,

      few?

  • Anonymous

    Not Labour’s fault, but last week the Sports Minister announced it would “NOT be an austerity Olympics”.

    Despite the fact that Cameron has constantly wittered on about “the age of austerity” and last night, despite votes against the Coalition’s welfare cuts, the government has signalled they will press ahead regardless, i.e. people undergoing painful and exhausting chemotherapy for cancer will still have limits placed on their ESA.

    What Labour needs to concentrate on is the appalling waste of money that the Coalition persist with. Yes, it might appear that to do so would label you killjoys, but can there be any justification for wasting money on some here-today-gone-tomorrow gala where many very wealthy individuals will be given free tickets.

    The Conservatives go on about their financial “prudence”. The Olypics nonsense is just one example of their hypocrisy.
    My policy for Labour would be to stop dreaming that Blairism is due for a revival. The party might get it’s way, but that is not to say the public will buy it. After all they didn’t buy Hague, or Howard.

    • Anonymous


      The Olypics nonsense is just one example of their hypocrisy.

      As about 95% of the spend has already happened.. and 100% of it was approved by a Labour Government .. your comment can be seen as for what it : political muppetry.

      • Anonymous

        Had the current government wished to they could have scaled back on some of the opulence, and while we are at it they could also give a firm no to the proposed railway -£32 billion just to get to Birmingham 30 minutes quicker?

        I am sure even the most pompous self important businessman will not be lying on his deathbed satying “I wished I had saved 30 minutes on my trip to New Street”.

        Don’t worry, I didn’t approve of the Olympics nonsense when it became Blair’s 2006 vanity project – too much money was poured down to the drain, and that sadly can’t be helped, but the current government could ensure belts were tightend a bit

  • JC

    How about simplifying the tax code so that tax avoidance and planning can be reduced (preferably to nothing) and hitting the evaders (black economy and straightforward liars) hard so that all tax is collected. I don’t mean the legal disputes here, this has arisen because of the complexity of the system.

    • Anonymous

      How about simplifying the tax code so that tax avoidance and planning can be reduced (preferably to nothing)
      Hmm.. I presume you know the difference between evasion and avoidance?

      On the basis that you do, then  you can only remove tax avoidance by removing all – I repeat ALL – tax allowances.

      Which is bound to have some very nasty effects but as you want it .. then …that’s your problem.

      (incidentally that means ALL Personal Allowances vanish so you start paying income tax when you earn over £1. In a year.

      That will be highly popular with the low paid.

Latest

  • News Video Clegg refuses to rule out raising tuition fees FIVE times

    Clegg refuses to rule out raising tuition fees FIVE times

    Nick Clegg used to promise that he’d abolish tuition fees. Labour warned this morning that Clegg and the Tories would raise them again. Miliband has today promised to quit if he doesn’t cut tuition fees. Yet Nick Clegg has FIVE chances to rule out another tuition fees rise on Marr this morning, and he just wouldn’t do it: There was someone dressed as an elephant outside the BBC today, reminding Clegg that students don’t forget…they also watch TV you know… […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Miliband says he won’t stand again if he fails to cut tuition fees

    Miliband says he won’t stand again if he fails to cut tuition fees

    Ed Miliband has been faced mockery for his “carved in stone” pledges this morning – but it seems he’s deadly serious about the pledges he’s made – so much so he’s just told an audience in Worcester that he won’t stand again if he fails to cut tuition fees as PM and that “I expect to be held to account on all six of Labour’s pledges”: “I will cut tuition fees from £9,000 to £6,000. And I tell you this, if I fail […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured The only thing that matters come May 8th is learning how to count

    The only thing that matters come May 8th is learning how to count

    Robert A Caro’s biography of Lyndon B Johnson is one of the finest political works of the modern era. But it has one essential lesson for any politician or would-be politician – learn how to count. That’s a lesson that’s always rung true in British politics, but which will count especially so from May 8th onwards. If David Cameron can’t command a majority (323 votes) in the Commons to remain as Prime Minister, he’s gone, no matter what noise is made […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour say tuition fees will rise to £11,500 a year under the Tories

    Labour say tuition fees will rise to £11,500 a year under the Tories

    Today Labour are releasing new figures which will show that tuition fees will rise to £11,500 a year under current government plans. This analysis highlights that the government’s planned cuts would create a £1.5 bn shortfall in the higher education budget by 2018-2019. This shortfall would result in university fees being raised by £2,500 a year. Labour are pointing out the difference between this forecast and their plans to cut tuition fees to£6,000 a year as of September 2016. This […]

    Read more →
  • News Miliband aims to restore trust in politics by literally setting his promises in stone

    Miliband aims to restore trust in politics by literally setting his promises in stone

    Labour’s election pledges will be carved into stone and installed in Downing St or Labour HQ if Miliband becomes prime minister. The move is hoped to underline how seriously the Labour leader takes his pre-election promises. The 8ft 6in limestone block would be unveiled on Sunday, and would likely bear Labour’s the six election pledges that appear on the pledge card. Miliband told The Observer: “Nick Clegg and David Cameron have helped erode trust in all political leaders by the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit