Why we need a rethink on resettlement

January 13, 2012 9:57 am

I have always been a Labour supporter. Perhaps not surprising when both my parents were Labour councillors. But I also had an admiration for the Army that came through my late father who was proud of his time both in the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders, where he served in the Korean war, but also afterwards where he joined the TA in Ipswich.

He was very proud of me when I joined the Army at 16 (though disappointed that I joined the Royal Green Jackets rather than a Highland regiment).

I went on to spend 24 years in the regiment, much of it under a Tory government. The Labour Party at that time was not popular in the Forces, mainly due to uncertainty about our aims in Northern Ireland. But let’s not be fooled into thinking the Tories were the solders’ friend.

A winter tour of the Falklands in 1988 saw most of us wearing uniform and using equipment that we had purchased ourselves. I remember the local East Anglian Daily Times journalist visiting us in West Falkland and surprised to see that other than my trousers and beret all other clothing and my boots had been purchased myself.

The end of my career saw a Labour Government win control and straight away a noticeable change when Labour Ministers visited military units. George Robertson, John Reid and even Tony Blair wanted to speak to military men and women. This was far different from when we used to have Tory ministers visit. A visit by Heseltine to Germany in 1985 led to a number of us being hidden away on some range in Sennelager in case we said the wrong thing, and the only chance of seeing Soames when Armed Forces minister was if you ended up washing up in the Officers’ Mess when he was having lunch.

But the Tories have learnt from Labour and now you will see Cameron mixing with Rifleman and others in the dust and the dirt. But I suspect this is just for show.

I went back to the Army in 2009 and had the honour to be part of 2 Rifles as we attempted (and succeeded) in making Sangin a safer place. Improvement came with a high penalty to pay in terms of those who were killed or badly injured over that summer of intense fighting, but what I saw was undoubted bravery and sacrifice of Rifleman who had not changed since when I was serving the first time.

I am still in touch with many who are still serving. When I speak to them I sense a fear – a fear of the unknown. Will their regiment even exist by 2020? Where will they be based? Will they have to uproot their family again? Will they be made redundant? Will the resettlement package enable them to make the transition back into Civvy Street smoothly?

For some it will be even harder. For example those who are suffering from injuries they picked up in Afghanistan or Iraq; injuries which can be physical and mental. Or those who have chosen to make Germany their chosen home, marrying Germans and even sending their children to the local German school.

The Government has made initial statements about which camps will close and where those soldiers will move to. So from a thriving and busy German Garrison town they may find

themselves in a remote part of Norfolk on an old RAF camp, or in a newly built camp in Scotland which has no history or experience of having a military community on its doorstep.

My experience of resettlement in not a good one. The role of resettlement officer is just deemed to be a side-line for the education officer. The civilian advisers are no better – I was an infantry Warrant Officer when I left and as far as my adviser was concerned that meant I could be a warehouse manager! If he had asked my QM or even the Rifleman in the Recce Platoon of 2RGJ they would say the last job I should have is to be in charge of stores!

In 2002 the resettlement scheme had problems. I know the Government sought to improve these but I worry about how it will cope now, with thousands likely to be made redundant or leaving as they see no future for themselves in the Armed Forces. And how will the scheme cope with those who want to remain in Germany?

I am not sure the Government has not thought any of this through and that is why I am very glad that ‘Labour Friends of the Forces’ has taken  resettlement as its first major campaign issue.  If you have had an experience of the programme please do tell us here. Now more than ever, at a time of cut backs and redundancies, we need to get this service right.

The Coalition Government is just interested in cutting numbers and cutting costs, with no concern for those soldiers and their families who have to either move to a new home or leave the military. This is yet another betrayal of our Armed Forces by this Government.

  • http://twitter.com/robertsjonathan Jonathan Roberts

    Excellent article and thank you for your service to the country.

    I was interested by the word ‘but’ in your opening paragraph.  I don’t think there is anything in Labour values that prohibit support for the military.  It is a vital part of our security as a nation, it protects the freedoms and liberties we hold dear. 

    Whilst some may disagree with how our politicians deploy the military, that is a political issue.   Our forces are perhaps the best in the world, and we should be proud of them.

    • Anonymous

      ” I don’t think there is anything in Labour values that prohibit support for the military.  ”
       
       
      Just as well there isn’t considering the number of times Blair used them in his warmongering

      • http://twitter.com/robertsjonathan Jonathan Roberts

        yawn.

        • Anonymous

          Why are you on here obviously your still fawning to be an MP, but I think the people can see past your silly comments

          • Anonymous

            I’d like to see the reaction if Roberts made such a stupid comment (“yawn”) to Mrs Rose Gentle, or the parents or wives who have lost sons,  thanks to Blair’s military adventures

        • Anonymous

          I don’t understand you Jon. You make out you are so “nice” and no doubt think yourself very clever, but you make the most trite comments. I think you need to grow up, sonny.

          • http://twitter.com/robertsjonathan Jonathan Roberts

            My ‘yawn’ was because I’m bored of not being able to write any comment on this site – even when it’s one about showing respect for military heroes – without you trying, usually successfully, to goad me into an off-topic argument and Tony Blair/New Labour.

            You can carry on calling me arrogant and condescending (as you have elsewhere), trite and immature.   You know that these are things I feel you to be far more guilty of.  Indeed, you can carry on calling me Jonny Boy and Sonny if you really must. 

            Far greater people than me have ended up giving up on quality sites because of stuff like this. But this is an article about respect for the military, which I showed in my original comment, it’s not an article about me and you arguing.

            I won’t reply to any of your further comments because when you an I argue they end up becoming disrespectful to the author’s good intentions – something I share equal blame with you on.

          • Anonymous

            When you respond to articles on a public forum, you have to expect to have your comments replied to. If you are unable to accept that, I suggest you find somewhere more  congenial.

            I was not showing disrespect to the miitary, I was merely pointing out – fact not opinion – that Blair got this country involved in more wars than any other peacetime Prime Minister. If you can’t accept truth for what it is, what arfe you doing here?.

            You should get out of the habit of toadying to those writers you agree with, and spitting venom or being condescending to those you disagree with.

            I always think it a great pity that right-wing “Labour” supporters like you have to be so damned condescending

          • Anonymous

            I do not need to argue about Blair we all know and have out own feelings about him.

            The point is many of the young people who will be sacked over the coming years will be seriously disabled  first.

            What jobs do we have for them which companies will employ them, well once upon a time it would be the public sector, sadly that’s gone now and I just cannot see to many employers wanting the hassle of people with serious disabilities working for them even if they are according to politicians hero’s.

  • Mbrash

    Alasdair – call me on 01333 730119 – Michel Brash, Editor, Pathfinder

    • Alasdair Ross

      will do Monday

  • Pingback: Why we need a rethink on resettlement | Labour Friends of the Forces

Latest

  • News Unison Conference 2013 Unison set out their expectations for a Labour government

    Unison set out their expectations for a Labour government

    Unison General Secretary Dave Prentis set out his tests for continuing to support Labour this afternoon. Speaking at their conference in Liverpool, Prentis said: For too long we’ve built the careers of Labour politicians, only to be let down when we needed them most. I don’t want to hear Labour apologising for past mistakes, I want to see a clear agenda from Labour for the future. We must not support a Labour Government that does not : put an end [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Scotland Why on earth shouldn’t Nigel Farage visit Scotland?

    Why on earth shouldn’t Nigel Farage visit Scotland?

    You’ve got to admire Nigel Farage. Like a comedian who’s already died on stage at the Glasgow Empire, he’s put on his “optimistic” hat and chosen to return to Scotland to campaign for UKIP. His last visit, you will recall, was memorable for his being forced to seek refuge in an Edinburgh pub from a mob of nationalists and trots shouting “SCUM!” at him as he tried to convey his message (a tad harsh, I thought. But I suppose “gentleman [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment

    Labour needs more than a few warm words on the environment, energy security and climate change

    It seems that with the announcements of their intention to end universality in social security and accept the Coalition’s spending envelopes, Labour are gradually beginning to articulate what the Labour Party’s 2015 manifesto will look like. While much has been said on social security, general economic direction and housing shortages; there has been little said on the environment, energy security and climate change. Other than a few warm words from Mary Creagh MP in LabourList’s ‘One Nation Labour: Debating the Future’ [...]

    Read more →
  • News 5,000 soldiers face redundancy – Media roundup: June 18th, 2013

    5,000 soldiers face redundancy – Media roundup: June 18th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this (and much more) in your inbox. You can sign up here. 5,000 soldiers face redundancy Thousands of members of the armed forces will receive redundancy letters tomorrow – as Government defence cuts continue to bite. Up to 5,300 serving soldiers in the Army will lose their jobs – including [...]

    Read more →
  • News Has David Cameron lost the plot?

    Has David Cameron lost the plot?

    Once upon a time David Cameron was known for his deft handling of the public mood. Not anymore. Last night, he tweeted: This is the menu for the #G8UK dinner. I’ll chair a discussion on tax, trade, transparency and Syria at 830 tonight pic.twitter.com/GAWDxvEDkI — David Cameron (@David_Cameron) June 17, 2013 This is a Prime Minister who is often lambasted as “out of touch”, at a time when half a million people are being driven to using Foodbanks because they [...]

    Read more →