Boris is back in the lead – but what’s below the top line?

February 13, 2012 1:07 pm

There’s another poll out today on the mayoral race from YouGov for the Evening Standard – and after Ken Livingstone’s surge in their last poll, it’s now Boris who is (just) ahead (51-49). We’re well within the margin of error, as we were with the last YouGov poll, so essentially it’s neck and neck. After months of big leads and volatile polling, the race is settling down in its final months to be what it was always likely to be – a tight race that will be decided on the day. Or as the Evening Standard put it:

“a bookmakers’ dream: a battle between two heavyweights that could go either way.”

In a tight battle like this one, organisation is everything. That should give supporters of Labour and Livingstone cause for cheer. The greatest lesson to come from Labour’s 2010 campaign was that “on the ground” campaigns are absolutely key in winning when the polls are tight. The Livingstone campaign have heeded this lesson, and invested heavily in a “ground war” strategy – phone banking, co-ordinated door knocking, investment in organisers on the ground – that provides a stark contrast with the “air war” deployed by Team Boris. For the Tory mayor’s campaign, publicity for the candidate matters above all else,. In contrast the Labour campaign focussed on getting a strong organisational base in place before the “Fare Deal” media blitz in recent months that mirrored Ken’s poll boost.

Who is successful is likely to be determined by which approach is more suited to the style of contest we’re seeing. If London is a “single issue” campaign (like a referedum) then “air war” might have a place, but if this is an issue based mid-term election – which I believe it is – then the organisational “ground war” is all important. This is especially true when considering that Ken recieves a smaller percentage of his own party’s vote that Boris (82% vs 91%). The power of CLPs across London to turn out the Labour vote (far bigger than the generic Tory vote in London) and ensure that a higher percentage backs Ken will be crucial in delivering victory in May.

For either a ground war or an air war to work though, a campaign needs issues to work with and “squeeze” the electorate – especially when turning out voters in a potentially low turnout election. It is the issues – rather than the top line – which Boris should be looking at today. Although we know he’s not so hot on detail, even he should be able to see the issues that Londoners care about are not moving in his direction.

Transport and Crime are the most important issues for Londoners – with Ken Livingstone’s 7% fare cut having far greater resonance than any other policy. 36% of voters describing this as the most appealing policy put forward by the mayoral candidates. In second place with 21% is increasing police numbers, whilst Boris Johnson’s measly £3.10 1% council tax cut is viewed as the most appealing policy by just 9%.

The top line figures migight suggest that Boris has his nose marginally in front at the moment, but he has little room to manoeuvre on the issues that matter most to Londoners. It’s going to be an interesting race – whether it takes place in the sky, or on the ground. And it’s there to be won.

  • Anonymous

    Frankly, I think it is a question of which of the two old entertainers has been most “daring” in his act on any given week, which one of them will get top of the bill status. If there is any point in a Mayorality – which I frankly doubt – it should be more than the ego and punching power of just two old would-be heavyweights.

    • Anonymous

      It’s going to be hard i suspect getting people out to vote, both have been  doing their best to get people interested but as we all know the name of the game will be cuts, promising lower bus fairs is fine but the money may well come from some other area.

      I just think the person who ends up getting enough people out will as always win

  • Daniel Speight

     I guess the real problem is Livingstone has a charisma deficit compared to Johnson. Labour activists are going to have to attempt to make issues and policies count ahead of charisma. Might as well learn to do it now because the  next general election will have the same problem.

    We  could always try to find candidates with charisma rather than any principles of course. Then again last time we did that we ended up with Blair, and there zero principles equalled the sleaze which we can still smell today. (In fact come to think of history already gave us an example long before Blair. Ramsay MacDonald had the Blair charisma attributes also. Why didn’t someone spot what was going on?)

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →