Matt Zarb-Cousin is a beautiful snowflake

February 6, 2012 8:47 pm

Snowflakes are unique. Each is completely beautiful in its own way.

Then they fall to the ground and they all look the same. They conform. They sell out. Those unscrupulous, spineless, yellow-bellied Judas Iscariots. They are the Lib Dems of the weather world. This weekend, it wasn’t the roads that were treacherous, or the “conditions”, it was the pathetic, compliant snowflakes themselves.

I suppose, perhaps, it’s because of some sort of societal pressure. “Don’t think about staying unique forever,” young snowflakes are told, “No single snowflake ever made a snowball, or killed a man in a horrific avalanche. Just look what happened to your Uncle Graupel; he said that thing on Twitter about fairtrade bananas and when his time was up, he melted sad and alone, in the sea.”

There it is. A tenuous link between the weather and something that has happened. Each as much a non-story as the other. It’s snowing? That’s not a lead story. A Parliamentary researcher to a Shadow Minister for Justice has made a joke about the Queen being a scrounger? I was honestly so bored I stopped listening before that sentence finished. Not even the Shadow Justice Secretary. Matt Zarb-Cousin works as a researcher for a guy who works as part of a team for the guy whose job is being Not The Justice Secretary.

What Matt did was to make a joke about the Queen, a very wealthy lady who receives her money from the taxpayer, by using the kind of language the reactionary right wing press use to demonise very poor people who receive their money from the taxpayer. The reactionary right wing press then lived up to their name. It seems a shame to explain Matt’s joke, but I’d become a little worried that some people hadn’t “got it”.

Craig Woodhouse, who wrote up the story for the Evening Standard, appears to be one such person. Then again, that’s understandable when you take into account that he is an idiot. I say this, because he clearly doesn’t believe that Matt using his Twitter biography to say that all views are his own – and therefore, not necessarily those of his employer – means that you can’t then use those views as a reflection of his employer’s. A little ironic then, that Woodhouse chooses to use his own Twitter biography to state that he is “tweeting in a personal capacity”. In the unlikely event that Craig Woodhouse ever says something interesting then we can naturally assume it is a reflection of the views of Alexander Lebedev. Woodhouse defended his story on Twitter by pointing out that the Queen’s 60th Jubilee means that it is 60 years since her father died, making Matts commentsinsensitive.

If she finds that insensitive, we better cancel those Diamond Jubilee celebrations pronto. Those fireworks are gonna look pretty bloody macabre now.

It feels like a story that has been proffered by journalists to people as something that could potentially be offensive. When they asked Matt on Twitter whether he still worked for Andy Slaughter, it wasn’t because so many people had been offended by what he’d said; they were trying to bring the comments to a wider audience in order to find people to be offended. Once that happens, you’ve got your story. Paul Waugh, one of the first to comment on it, later tweeted about Network Rail’s directors foregoing their bonuses as a proper story.

Of course, Matt Zarb-Cousin is Not A Story. It’s a shame he must have had a bad day because of it. He didn’t deserve it and it’s a sad indictment of the political age we’re falling into. People in politics shouldn’t be interesting. They can’t anymore. Being unique might be nice at first, but eventually you have to conform, or you won’t get anywhere. Today Matt was strung up on a lamppost (very possibly the one next to Tom Harris), so everyone could see what happens to you when you dare to be different. When you decide to use your Twitter account to have an opinion rather than some boring, empty platitude about doorknocking. When you decide to phrase your views in a funny way so that maybe, just maybe, someone who isn’t interested in politics might be interested in what you have to say. Heaven forfend we actually try and engage with people.

One wonders if Charlie Elphicke, the backbench rent-a-gob no-mark Tory MP who decried Matt’s tweet as “a shameful slur” will ever have anything interesting to say. What I think is really sad, looking at him, another faceless mannequin of the politico production factory in this country, is that he might once have been a snowflake.

  • Kernow Castellan

    The poor chap obviously made a mistake.

    However, he seems not to understand the impact of appearance, image and message in modern politics.

    Perhaps politics is not the best choice of career for him.

    • Anonymous

      Or perhaps he’s a normal person (and not a politician) and should be allowed to have an opinion?

      • Kernow Castellan

        That argument works for industries other than politics. His public broadcasts will always reflect on his employer, for good or ill.

        You may not like it, but pretending that our current politics does not work like that is rather naive (and you really should know better)

      • Anonymous

        Mark: he may not be a “politician” yet but he obviously has designs on that outcome. I was waiting for some paint to dry so I read his Twitter twatter and after his faux pas said something to the effect of  ”I made a joke about the Queen – how very dare I”

        Surely if he wants to become a politician he shouldn’t use one of Derek Faye’s catchphrases!

      • Anonymous

        But of course we know that ordinary people can have a view that some people do not like, then they get loads of hassle for daring to have a view, even to the point of being banned

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=697126564 Paul Halsall

        I rather like the Queen, and I don’t dislike Charles (his views on some modern architecture are right on), but I thing worries about a tweet are simply ludicrous.

        Mr Zarb-Cousins lists himself on Linked-In as in public relations!  I find it really odd that people here think that such a profession means he “deserves” a political career.How can I put this: many Labour voters simply recoil for voting for anyone from the entire spad/PR/PPE type backgrounds from which so many prospective politicians come.  And, to be frank, a double-barrelled name does not help either (and yes, I suppose that is class prejudice).

        [Meanwhile, in terms of misleading headlines, I clicked on this story because I thought it was a coming-out story!).

    • Johndclare

       Wrong!  Matt Zarb-Cousins is able, principled, lively and creative.  He deserves a successful career in politics.
      With respect, you seem to have missed the whole point of mr Pope’s article; at least Matt Zarb-Cousins is not bland.

      Besides – although Matt has seen best to retract – he was only saying what tens of thousands of other people think too.
      The Royal family, in fact, has been living off the populace for millennia, and it IS time we stopped it.

      What’s the term they are using – ‘faux-outrage’?  Sums it up in one.

      • Kernow Castellan

        Whether you like the faux-outrage or not, it was entirely predictable. His failure to think before making a public broadcast does question his ability in his chosen field.

        Hopefully he will learn from this, and not repeat such an elementary mistake.

      • Anonymous

        Millennia?

      • Anonymous


        He deserves a successful career in politics.”

        Why?

  • http://twitter.com/northernheckler nilsinela boray

    I follow Matt on twitter but this one passed me by.

    I’m no monarchist. Neither do I feel that Matt’s comments are shocking or offensive.

    However …

    Surely he should have a bit more sense than to tweet something that he knows others may well find offensive, when he also knows that this is likely to reflect badly on his employer (and in turn his political party).

    It may well be unfair that the Queen has a large publicly funded income, but it’s no more her fault that she was born as heir to the throne, than it’s my fault that I was born as an occupant of a council house in the Heavy Woollen District. While ever the nation chooses to have a hereditary monarch, then she’s just doing her job, and can not be blamed for reaping the benefits of that position whilst she discharges the duties that are expected of her.

    Attack the principles and politics of monarchy by all means (please) but a personal attack on one of the less objectionable monarchs that have reigned over the years is not doing yourself, your employer, your party, or your country any favours.

    • Anonymous

      A good post. I totally agree. It is not as if the current Queen was like Victoria, who more or less disappeared into her own private world for decades – she continues to work at 85, long past the age when most of us would want to. She has never caused embarrassment to the country like certain politicians have, and she has always put her great sense of duty first. 

      Twitter really will be the downfall of a lot of would-be politicians who have too much time on their hands – in this instance what David Cameron said about Twitter was 100% correct.

      • Anonymous

        The idea that the Queen is just “doing her job” is frankly risable.
        This is a very political monarch. The first to operate in a period of universal suffrage.
        In the sense that she has managed to survive as an anachranism in a democratic era she has “done a good job”.

        Perhaps she deserves a bonus, along with the rest of the 1%.

        • Anonymous

          I can’t really see how you can call her “political”. She has managed to conduct herself with great dignity, despite the antics of some of her family. She is respected throughout the world, and at 85, I think she is entitled to some respect and even affection.

          I would have no quarrel if she were the last Monarch – in the sense that she will be a hard act to follow, and I frankly don’t think the next three in line are up to it.

          I have nothing but admiration for her – just imagine being married to Prince Philip for 65 years and having to put up with his moods, to say nothing of the two PMs who thought THEY were the Queen (Mrs Thatcher and Tony Blair) tramping over your Axminster once a week. I don’t think I would have coped!

          • Anonymous

            The one thing that has kept me with the Queen has been.

            Margret and Dennis President of the UK, or Tony and Cherie as president of the UK.

            Can you imagine those two that would be political and obscene.

          • Anonymous

            Yes agree. In the case of the Blair’s there would have been an added dillema: who would have worn the tiara;  Cherie or Tony?

          • Anonymous

            No problem they’d have one each paid for by the tax payer.

    • Anonymous

      Mostly true, with the exception that it misses the point (as Zarb-Cousin did) that since 1760 the Royal Family’s income from its estates has been surrendered to the government. The Civil List is tiny in comparison.

    • Redshift

      Surely the point in calling her a scrounger is actually to reflect upon the bizarre situation where thousands of vulnerable and poor people are demonised as scrougers because they live off taxpayers’ money when in fact this year we are throwing a state-funded nation-wide party for an incredibly wealthy person who lives off taxpayers’ money.   

  • http://twitter.com/_DaveTalbot David Talbot

    Call me old fashioned, but I find the emerging use of Twitter as a news medium worrying. 

    Craig Woodhouse won’t be winning the Pulitzer Prize for his smear job in the Evening Standard. Twitter isn’t journalism. It has proven invaluable in reporting the immediacy of breaking news, providing snapshots of multiple opinions from events live as they happen – proliferating news reporting like never before. But it will never replace the authority, depth initiative and skill that defines traditional writing.

    Matt has been at the centre of a manufactured storm, a storm that says views expressed on a personal outlet should be judged with the utmost seriousness and pounced upon by journalists with political journalists.

    I would also add that Paul Waugh, the usually excellent Editor of PoliticsHome, did not have his finest hour with this episode.

  • http://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes Guido Fawkes

    He should have stuck to his guns.

    • Daniel Speight

      Have you ever done an exposé on the royal family Guido? Can’t remember anything recently. Maybe your republicanism is a bit fake.

  • Anonymous

    What Matt did was to make a joke about the Queen, a very wealthy lady
    who receives her money from the taxpayer, by using the kind of language
    the reactionary right wing press use to demonise very poor people who
    receive their money from the taxpayer.

    So not like the labour party then, work shy scroungers non tax payers and our dearly beloved hard working squeezed middle class, “saying in Wales”  kettle calling pot black or is that C2 or is it C1. these days can never tell when to use Black after Labour.

    • Anonymous

      Workshy?

      I’d like to see you or Matthew do half her job. Between you.

      • Daniel Speight

         Wonder what the hourly rate would work out as.  Can you apply for it at the job centre?

        • Anonymous

          I’m not sure, but if you could check on your next visit I’d be interested in finding out.

          • Anonymous

            Hands up all those who want to become an incipient queen!       :-)

          • Anonymous

            ;D

          • Anonymous

            Winston might become queen his attitude is about right of course I’d have to be a king.

      • Anonymous

        Well of course you could say I’m half the bloke I was.

        But she works hard, hahahha never mind of course she also lives a life of luxury none of us can.

        But as I said above better her then Blair or Thatcher, although not to sure about Charlie boy

        But it depends a lot on what you call work, does it not.

        Ass and hole  come to mind

        • Anonymous

          Badoom -tissssh!

          Very good Robert.

          • Anonymous

            Well the same goes it the coat fits wear it, the queen does a very good  hard job fine lucky the rest of us in the UK sat our asses, but the fact is the queen comes with a lot of baggage which we call the royal family.  The queen is lowly coming to the end of her time and lets see how the public feel about Charlie boy, and then the rest who will become the hangers on

  • Anonymous

    Didn’t even know about it until I read this.

    Bubble stuff. Clarkson defence. Nothing to see.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Paul-Barker/1546990341 Paul Barker

    Pity you couldnt resist the snide “joke” about the Libdems, we opposed the War in Iraq while all you Labourites collaborated in Genocide.

    • http://profiles.google.com/roger.f.mccarthy Roger McCarthy

      You really don’t know the meaning of ‘all’ or ‘collaborate’ or ‘genocide’ do you?

    • TomFairfax

      Personally I thought Menzies Campbell and Charles Kennedy showed real leadership on that issue.

      Shame then that the LibDems didn’t think of them as leaders.

      Why have forthright, honest people with integrity and the strength of their convictions in charge when you can have  Nick Clegg  instead?

    • Redshift

      I suppose that makes your systematic abandonment of everything you ever stood for ok then doesn’t it?

      Besides there were more Labour MPs who voted against the Iraq war than Lib Dem MPs. Fine, we had more MPs, but that kind of says more about your party than ours.

  • Anonymous

    Just so funny yet makes a very important point. Great stuff

  • http://profiles.google.com/roger.f.mccarthy Roger McCarthy

    Wasn’t he just quoting verbatim Jeremy Hardy’s joke on the News Quiz a couple of weeks ago?

    So shouldn’t the Tories be demanding the head of the head of light entertainment at Radio 4? (probably quite a good idea from their POV as comedy shows are the only place one can actually find criticism of the government on the BBC nowadays). 

    And as I have said before every time any Labour politico however insignificant uses twitter a Malcolm Tucker figure should appear and violently insert their phone (or more dramatically ipad or laptop) into the appropriate orifice. 

    It is the worst imaginable medium for communicating about politics. 

    Delenda est twitter….  
     

  • TomFairfax

    Totally unaware of this, err story. I assume he’s a friend Conor, otherwise the publicity seems inexplicable.

    Given Matt’s stance in the past, I’m more worried that he is working in any capacity whatsoever in Westminster, than repeating jokes from Radio 4.

    More scary still, it’s something to do with Justice. A  subject he has previously demonstrated a frightening level of ignorance of on this very site. Maybe he learnt something from that.

    Given Tweet, probably not.

    Apparently then, DNA evidence was foolproof evidence of  someone being at a crime scene, instead of evidence that something touched by someone had either come into contact with something else at a crime scene, or was  itself at the scene.

    Couple that with an attitude that everyone should be treated like a criminal that hadn’t yet been caught, and I’m left rather mystified as to why he he’s assisting anyone without an intention of setting up a police state. (I’m hoping Mr Slaughter isn’t)

  • Mark Thompson

    Spot on Conor. Great piece. I’ve written about this sort of thing repeatedly over the years. The protagonists are from time to time from all three parties and the “outraged” respondents are also from all three parties. It’s pathetic.

    No wonder we end up with so many SpeakYourWeight robots.

    And I agree Tom Harris has been appallingly treated by the party for daring to be a bit interesting and amusing.

    • Anonymous

      Mark (T): I think you have to decide, if you enter politics, that you are not there to be “amusing” (I find Stephen Pound MP when he has tried to be “amusing” on radio 4′s Today programme toe-curlingly embarrassing), but on the other hand you don’t want to go to the other extreme and be a pompous boor (examples come to mind such as Michael Gove, David Miliband and from the past, Patricia Hewitt).

      If you are going to make jokes about people be sure it is somebody who has the right of reply: The Queen has to accept every questionable joke and derision and those who make those remarks knows she cannot respond.  Have a go at the institution of Monarchy by all means, say what you like about Cameron or David Miliband because if they wish to they can respond, but trying to be amusing about a lady of 85 who has never done any harm or damage to the country is a bit cowardly.

      If Zarb-Cousin wants to be “a bit interesting and amusing” why not apply to the Head of Light Entertainment at the BBC for an audition and perhaps he could get on the News Quiz, then we can see who can tell Jeremy Hardy’s jokes best – Matt or Mr Hardy

      • Anonymous

        After what New labour has done making a joke of Hitler

    • Anonymous

      To many silly errors being made and using the Nazis as a joke is not really funny

  • Anonymous

    Shouldn’t Prince Charles be inducted into the Work Programme?

    • Anonymous

       He would say he works for the Princes trust of course, and a few other Charities and of course Building and Military organisations.

  • Pingback: QE2@60 « Julian's musings

  • Anonymous

     That explains the great disturbance I felt in the force – as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

  • jt0122223

    no.. by your ridiculous definition my occupation as a doctor for the NHS (deriving from taxpayer income) makes me a ‘scrounger’. i find that borderline offensive

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →