Nick Clegg – perpetual Deputy Prime Minister?

29th February, 2012 10:24 am
What is the true motive for Nick Clegg’s House of Lords reforms?
After the AV debacle the idea of another constitutional reform seemed comical, but it reappeared in the days following David Cameron’s apparent veto at the EU summit in December. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that this was the payoff that Clegg wrenched from Cameron, in those tense days when the coalition wobbled. The thing that is interesting is that we’ve been here before.
In the formation of the coalition agreement, following the 2010 election, Clegg swept aside his party’s polices on tuition fees and the NHS, for the sake of an AV referendum. Apparently his passion for a fairer voting system outweighed his desire to protect health or stick up for students. His true motive was that AV would be beneficial to his party’s electoral prospects. He sacrificed principle for power, or at least the chance of it.
So is the advocacy of Lords reform the same old spots on the same old leopard? Did he remain quiet on Europe for a chance to change the second chamber?
His proposal is that they be elected by Proportional Representation. As we know, PR would be very beneficial to the Liberal Democrats. Although Clegg speaks of his desire for more democracy, he expects to considerably increase the number of Lib Dem peers by this reform. However, since this is only the second chamber, why would this make a big difference to the power of the Nick Clegg?
The answer is that with an increased vote in the House of Lords, his party would have the ability to join forces with the opposition and act as a block to legislation. The elected government would then be forced to offer government jobs to Clegg and his colleagues in return for their cooperation in the second chamber.
The closer we look at these proposals, the more they look like another attempt, by this political party, to gear our democracy towards permanent coalition government. The likelihood of Nick Clegg as a perpetual Deputy Prime Minister beckons. This is his chance to redeem himself, following his failure to deliver AV. His determination is un-faltered.
He claims to be motivated by democracy, but this profound constitutional change will have no referendum, because he knows full well that if the details were scrutinised by the public they would reject his power grabbing scheme, again.
But should we be fearful of this? Perhaps perpetual coalition government is to be desired? Maybe the Lib Dems have done a good job at dulling the extreme aspects of Tory rule? Personally I think they’ve achieved precious little. The NHS reforms should never have been countenanced when the Prime Minister himself didn’t even understand them, and wouldn’t have been able to explain them to Clegg at the time the policy was agreed. The Tuition Fees increase may have been inevitable, but not to £9k. That was an insult to their promise. The only concessions that the Lib Dems truly desire is voting reform that works in their favour. They won’t change. And for this reason, they are a distraction to the workings of any proper government.
I’m not saying that there are no attractions to the idea of an elected House of Lords. There are lots of other arguments that need to be thought through. All I’m saying is that in the wider consideration of these things, it is wise to question the true motives of the chief advocate.
To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]
  • externalities

    Hysterical nonsense.

    1) An 80% elected house seems most likely at the moment, and if you do the sums you’ll find that the independent experts could almost always give Lab or Con a majority (i.e. if the legislation is good) while the Lib Dems couldn’t do the same *even with their pre-2011 vote share*.

    2) The Lib Dems benefit from FPTP by squeezing the Labour and Green vote in LDvsCon seats, and from incumbency in particular constituencies. They may struggle to win the same vote share in a free vote in large, multi-member constituencies.

    3) Why not let the people decide what the composition of the Lords should be? As for whether the public support this “power grabbing scheme”, polls say they do, with just 10% in support of wholly appointed second chamber (and that’s aside from all three parties’ manifestoes).

    4) You may have noticed that no party has a majority in the Lords at the moment, and that the Government are making it proportional by creating hundreds of new Tory+LD peers (for services rendered, of course). Is that what you want?

  • “PR would be very beneficial to the Liberal Democrats.”

    Beneficial to actually reflecting public opinion on their politics, you mean?

    “The Tuition Fees increase may have been inevitable, but not to £9k”

    Labour said they would follow the same review the Tories and Lib Dems did, they too would have gone to £9k. They have only since claimed they would only go to £6k, a move that would see richer graduates getting away with subsidising poorer students less.

    “All I’m saying is that in the wider consideration of these things, it is wise to question the true motives of the chief advocate.”

    Lords reform, to make them more democratic, has been on the agenda for over 100 years. I’m not sure Clegg can be accused of orchestrating a massive political coup from about 50 years before he was born.

    • Slakah

      Beneficial to actually reflecting public opinion on their politics, you mean?
      PR has it’s pitfalls, and to assume not is frankly silly. I am aware that PR isn’t AV, but the AV loss was so sound as to I believe infer that the public, do not want electoral reform pushed down their throats. A more immediate threat to democracy is the concentration of our media services to a couple powerful men. Andy Coulson, and Tony Blairs wedding trip are tantamount to that.

  • treborc

    Oh course to become a leader/ deputy you have to be an MP and I think Clegg will have to start looking for a new seat..

  • When Lords reform backfires horribly, I do hope we’ll see that faffing about with the constitution isn’t such a good idea.

  • John Ruddy

    Dan, we should back Proportional Representation because it is RIGHT and it is FAIR.
     
    It should not be about the politics, or the personalities. Remember, First past the post could also deliver permanant Tory Government too – indeed the 20th Century is a prime example of that.

  • Lords Reform has been a central plank of  Lib/Libdem policy for more than a Century. We never stopped calling for it & it was in The Coalition agreement. I dont doubt your confusion is genuine, Labour never really “Got” Democracy.

    • Slakah

      Yep because what we definitely need is to invigorate the already disenfranchised electorate by sending  them to the polls some many times that they kill any political interest they may have once held. If you want to improve democracy and representation in the UK, then the money would be better spent trying to increase democracy, instead of this Lib Dems attempt turn government into their Student Union.

    • John Ruddy

      Its also been Labour policy too.

  • ROB SHEFFIELD

    Nope- just as the Lib Dems were ‘demanding’ Browns resignation in their faux discussions with Labour in 2010 Cleggs head will be required to be served up on a platter circa 2015

Latest

  • Featured News Seats and Selections Luciana Berger in running for Liverpool City Region Mayor

    Luciana Berger in running for Liverpool City Region Mayor

    Luciana Berger will today become the third candidate in the race to get the Labour nomination for the Liverpool City Region Mayor election. Berger, who attends Shadow Cabinet as Shadow Minister for Mental Health, will announce her bid with a speech to local Labour members this afternoon. She is the second shadow minister to launch their candidacy for a new directly elected mayor position in a North West city, following Andy Burnham kicking off his Greater Manchester Mayor campaign earlier […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Sadiq Khan has stuck his neck on the line – but he hasn’t “discredited” Labour

    Sadiq Khan has stuck his neck on the line – but he hasn’t “discredited” Labour

    One evening at Labour Conference 2009, those of us attending from my constituency party met for a meal in a restaurant on the Brighton seafront. Our waiter was very excited to regale us with his familial tie to Labour royalty. “My great-great uncle was a Labour Prime Minister,” the waiter told us. “But I’m afraid you won’t like him: it was Ramsay MacDonald.” On cue, our well-oiled delegates treated him to panto hisses. “Now,” interrupted one, “I actually think there’s room for some reappraisal of Ramsay […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Uncategorized Sharon Hodgson: Labour will always stand up for children with special educational needs

    Sharon Hodgson: Labour will always stand up for children with special educational needs

    Since the Government announced its Schools White Paper last month, focus has been on their ham-fisted plans for the forced academisation of all schools. Though Ministers have subsequently U-turned on these flawed plans – after mounting opposition led by Labour and including parents, school leaders, teachers, governors, local councillors and their own backbenches – it is clear that they are still intent on obsessing over forcing or coaxing every school in England to become an academy. This fixation with school structures comes at the expense of raising standards for […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Jess Phillips hit by 600 rape tweets in one night

    Jess Phillips hit by 600 rape tweets in one night

    Jess Phillips has spoken of her disgust after receiving 600 tweets in one night about her rape. The Birmingham Yardley was bombarded with vile messages after launching a campaign to end online sexist bullying. “To see the attack of a pack on here check out my mentions 600 odd notifications talking about my rape in one night. I think twitter is dead,” she wrote on the online platform. Phillips, who was sexually assaulted as a teenager, today described the revolting […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Uncategorized Labour must view immigration as a political opportunity rather than an obstacle

    Labour must view immigration as a political opportunity rather than an obstacle

    In 2014, the last reliable figures that take ethnicity into account, there were 790,000 Poles living in the UK. With EU net migration still in the positive, and suggestions these figures might be a grossly underestimated, the total number could be significantly higher. To be clear, this is not a piece about immigration, or, at least, not about its effects on Britain, but about what policies may convince Polish migrants to vote Labour. Because the Tories have a head start. As EU migrants, most […]

    Read more →
x

LabourList Daily Email

Everything Labour. Every weekday morning

Share with your friends










Submit