Where are the good jobs for non-graduates?

February 25, 2012 10:43 am

With the release of new ONS statistics this week, the press has again demonstrated its tendency to focus on graduate employment – or lack thereof. We’re used to hearing of a “lost generation” of students, indebting themselves in pursuit of jobs that no longer exist.

Less often do we hear as much about the fate of non-graduates, still the majority of our workforce, who are twice as likely as those without degrees to be out of work. Attention then tends to focus solely on the number of jobs available to them, but here at nef we believe the quality of jobs is just as important as the quantity.

Our newly published analysis looks more closely at the job market for non-graduates, and the ten sectors most likely to employ them. Only a few of these offer what we deem a ‘good job’ – one which pays its employees a decent wage, and a reasonable chance of career progression.

Traditional providers of such positions – the manufacturing and construction industries in particular – are not offering as many jobs as they once did. Since the 1980s, we have seen instead a rapid expansion of low paid, low skilled sectors. The biggest employer of non-graduates is now the retail industry, with hospitality and social care not far behind.

The continued loss of jobs in manufacturing will hit regions like the north-east disproportionately harder than elsewhere, worsening unemployment in already vulnerable areas. Gender inequality is also more pronounced in non-graduate employment, with those few ‘good’ sectors – construction, wholesale, transport – largely dominated by males, while less well-paid industries like social care employ more women.

Our ever-polarising job market – graduates increasingly occupying the top bands of income distribution, with non-graduates at the bottom – should be of huge concern to Labour. 55% of young people still aren’t entering higher education, and if this decline in good jobs for non-graduates isn’t halted, we are condemning them to an inevitable slide in living standards. Previous attempts to solve the problem through upskilling alone have proved fruitless, but there are solutions.

The government, as the major employer and purchaser, is already well placed to raise wages in sectors like social care. While globalisation is a major influencer on the job market, not all UK industries compete internationally, making it easier to encourage companies in retail and hospitality to pay higher wages. The decline in good sectors, like construction, can also be halted – new green and housing projects would ensure wide employment opportunities across the country.

While the current situation is pressing, it isn’t entirely bleak. There is a real opportunity for change, the case for which the Labour Party should be making.

Charles Seaford is the head of the Centre for Well-being at nef

  • JC

    “Only a few of these offer what we deem a ‘good job’ – one which pays its employees a decent wage, and a reasonable chance of career progression.”

    I think you’re living in a dream world. There’s no incentive to train staff anymore as there’s no financial advantage to businesses. Why train someone who will leave in a year or two when there are already many people with the skills available.
    If schools and colleges provided better training (spelling, grammar, maths etc), there would be better opportunities for school leavers. However, while we are members of the EU, then suitably trained staff are easy to find.

    • treborc

      Well yes because the people in France ,Germany, Poland,  and the other countries see the UK as a place to work, we in the UK still think of them as being foreign work places.

      Somebody has to train staff even in the EU, so it’s up to Government to train people to perhaps work in the EU, and less about worrying about local job markets.

      I go to my job centre not a single job in Poland Germany or France, yet my Uncle says in Germany they have lists of British jobs placed in the centres.

      • W G

        Ah, Norm’s “get on your bike”

        • treborc

          well bike and France and Germany bit to far how about get off your ass.

        • Jeff_Harvey

          With part-time jobs dominating most new employment opportunities it’s less a case of “getting on your bike” and more a case of “getting on your unicycle” and jumping through flaming hoops.

          • treborc

            Can the UK make  ten million jobs in the coming years eight million unemployed two million disabled people, that’s without the Migrants from the EU who may be heading here from the EU. If France or Germany start employing people our work force as to look at  being seriously mobile.

            I cannot for the life of me see any political party over the next ten twelve years see full employment again.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    Reading through the report, it outlines the issues but it doesn’t address the key question – why?

    Why do some low paid skills sectors pay more than others?

    What are the underlying causes?

    • treborc

      Could be lots of things, from simple living in a dump, to working in a dump, to boring jobs with no or little advancement, to good employers.

  • JoeDM

    Labour put the kybosh on the opportunities for young  non-graduate workers by opening up the boarders to unlimited immigration.

    • M Cannon

      That is an unfortunate comment. 

      The reason why immirgrants have tended to take the non-gradulate jobs is not just because our borders are rigthly open to citizens of the EU, but because, it seems, Labour’s non-graduates (i.e. the current generation of NEETS) are not willing and/or able to compete for those jobs.  This is not just about geography: there is a very high level of unemployment in London but there are also loads of jobs which those who were born and educated elsewhere fill

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    “Our ever-polarising job market – graduates increasingly occupying the top bands of income distribution, with non-graduates at the bottom – should be of huge concern to Labour.”

    What else do you expect?  Most graduate jobs pay more than non-graduate jobs, and that is entirely correct.  What do you propose Labour does about that?  I think that Labour should accept this as being as natural as the sun rising each morning or the tides coming in or going out, or else look completely stupid to normal people.  What Labour should instead concentrate upon is making sure that children get the right sort of basic and in depth education to actually be capable of gaining a rigorous degree.

  • M Cannon

    30 years ago Marks and Spencer used to boast that 95% of their goods were made in Britain. Mrs Thatcher had a go at hem when the percengate dropped to 90%.

    Nowasdays they are very quiet about where their goods come from.  They come from China.

    Cheap imports from China helped the economic success (aka boom) presided over by Mr Gordon Saviour of the World Brown.   They kept prices down allowing the “independent” Bank of England to keep interest rates low (also because the great Mr Brown -surely the most incompetent person ever to achieve the offices of Chancellor and Prime Minister on the grounds of basic competence without regard to people skills – ordered the Bank of England to adopt CPI rather than RPI as the inflation target, thereby taking the cost of housing out of the equation) so that we had an illusory boom in the years up to 2007.  It will take years yet to get out of the mess.

    But the good non jobs for non-graduates were lost to feed the ego of the great Gordo. 

    • Dave Postles

      M&S’s renunciation of its long-term supply arrangements with British textile mfrs has been well documented by Stanley Chapman.  If you lived in the ‘North’ (i.e. north of Watford), the repercussions were immediately obvious.  Being from Leicester (Corah’s) and living in Pinxton at the time (near Courtauld’s), the impact of the continuing demand from M&S to reduce prices was obvious.  

      • M Slater

         M&S switched to Chinese imports because they were forced to by other companies doing the same. UK raw material and labour costs were far higher than overseas suppliers. If they hadn’t switched then their customers would have switched to other shops, driving M&S out of business and causing the loss of thousands of jobs in the process. The textile jobs were lost because the UK textile industry couldn’t compete. Alternatively blame British consumers who insisted on paying the lowest possible prices for their clothes. Or would you prefer paying artificailly high prices to support British workers? Eitherthat or introduce trade barriers and protectionsm

  • richardavie

    I graduated from university in 2008 with a degree in Chemistry. I moved to Barcelona just for a working holiday but have stayed ever since and set up my own business with a group of fellow English teachers – http://www.tefl-iberia.com/.
    There are plenty of opportunities for graduates abroad, you just have to be pro-active and try something different to your degree subject. It’s an experience and looks good on the CV should you decide to come back.

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →