Why Labour must get off the sidelines on Europe

February 25, 2012 8:32 am

With the European right rallying behind Nicolas Sarkozy for the upcoming French presidential election, Ed Miliband must now move Labour away from the sidelines and offer similar support for socialist candidate Francois Hollande.

As politicians on the European right, buoyed by a period of centre-right ascendancy across the EU, have been campaigning together to secure austerity Europe, the left has, in contrast, been fragmented. As a consequence the burden has fallen on the grassroots to emerge as the sole vehicle to oppose the right’s vision of enforced austerity. Instead of the centre-left political parties articulating an effective opposition across Europe, it is in the indignados of Madrid, the Occupy movements and the anti-cuts protests in Brussels, London, Rome and Athens, rather than parliaments where the real opposition has emerged.

This is no more obvious than here in the UK where the Labour party has seemingly adopted a position of pragmatic Eurosceptism. Ed Miliband seems to be content to look on as the Tory right tear chunks out of David Cameron, while judging the issue far too toxic to actually make a serious comment on.

This is simply not good enough. With the centre-right coalescing around a shared vision of austerity, Ed Miliband must put himself at the forefront of an ‘alternative to austerity’, allying with leaders like Hollande who are willing to espouse the same policy. To succeed this must incorporate an economic message – propounding the need for investment in jobs and growth not just budget cuts – but also champion European policies defending strong social rights and welfare.

The Fabian Society’s Social Europe conference today will focus on these rights which the centre-right consensus in Europe has identified clearly as an obstacle to the small-government, fiscal discipline answer to the financial crisis. In Greece, the enforced budgetary cutbacks have targeted the minimum wage, working time regulations and the pushed for the introduction of a more ‘flexible’ job market. In France, Sarkozy has talked about the need to relax the 35-hour week and to pay for removing social charges on businesses paid for by an increase in that least-progressive of taxes, VAT. In the UK, right-wing Tories like Liam Fox talk about relaxing constraints on business, a message woven closely together with the endless Conservative diatribes about Brussels red tape.

This race to the bottom will help no-one in the long run. There is growing evidence from the UK and abroad that government spending cuts are fundamentally harming growth, producing fractional growth figures for successive quarters. Nor is there any substantive evidence showing that cutting back on employees’ rights and making it easier to hire and fire, produces genuine growth in jobs. Both Ed Miliband and Francois Hollande have spoken convincingly about the need for a more responsible capitalism, this message must be a key part of this.

These are problems that are taking place on the European scale and merit a response from a united left in Europe. It is simply not credible for Ed Miliband and Ed Balls to propose their economic alternative in the UK, while ignoring the wider European context. Sooner or later, they will have to get off the fence.

Andrew Harrop is the General Secretary of The Fabian Society and writes in a personal capacity. This post was first published at Next Left.

  • DaveCitizen

    Well said Andrew. The two Eds reluctance to come off the fence is, I think, much to do with their reluctance to take the politically risky step of accepting established economic assumptions no longer make sense.

    Although the writing is firmly on the wall of the old order in which the ‘West’ enjoyed a privileged economic position internationally, the implications of accepting this change are  seen as too dangerous. Much easier to cling to old mantras associated with making our economy more competitive, and ignore the loss of those other economic advantages that were crucial in delivering prosperous times.

    And there’s the vested interests too – if we really want to reduce the costs of making stuff and  doing business in Britain then an obvious place to start is by making land and property cheap – Council’s could do this by the stroke of a local planners pen, but that means taking on landowners, landlords and developers (plus any home owners who’ve convinced themselves that having a more expensive house is good for them).

    As you say, the left needs to take up the new economic order with more honesty and some guts. 

  • Pingback: Battleground France…. «

  • madasafish

    A article which is economically incoherent and eventually a tale of failure to recognise reality.
    There is growing evidence from the UK and abroad that government spending cuts are fundamentally harming growth, producing fractional growth figures for successive quarters

    What growth?  There is none. All the growth of the last decade was purely based on an increase in debt.  Europe is awash with debt and the writer proposes more.

    Sorry .. the conomics of the madhouse.

    I know mathematrics is not taught well and economics involves sums but the difficulty in understanding simple numbers should not hide reality.

    By borrowing more now, we are forcing our children to pay the debt back.

    Anyone would think that Greece would stand as a terrible example of gross over borrowing and its impact.

    Obviously not.
     

    • http://twitter.com/gonzozzz dave stone

      You should listen to President Obama: “You can’t cut your way to growth.”

      Just recall the General Motors situation. In 2009 GM was bankrupt. And what did GM do? Took out a loan for $15 billion. According to you this is the economics of the madhouse.
      This loan, along with support from the U.S. government, has enabled to company to return to profitability. Over a million jobs were saved. And last year G.M. sold more vehicles than any other company in the world.

      And employees are set to receive wage rises (one hardly dare wisper those two words in austerity stricken Britain) and profit sharing bonuses.

      It’s elementary economics, unless you’re an unemployment-loving, no-growth craving, head-banging axe-grinder, of course.

      http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/story/2012-02-23/auto-bailout-Michigan-candidates/53226972/1 

      • mikestallard

        What was that man in Ireland…..de Laurian?
        Now let me see…..

        • http://twitter.com/gonzozzz dave stone

          DeLorean and GM similar? Sorry, you’re on the wrong site. Try this:
          http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/

          • mikestallard

            Is Andrew Leather who wrote Nightmare any relation to Dame Suzi?
            She knows about as much about industrial development as does any other politician.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    @ Andrew Harrop,

    did you consider an alternative to your argument, that the reason the left in Europe has collapsed since 1945 is because socialism as a construct for government is a totally discredited and mad idea?  It is destructive at the human level, as has been proved in multiple places around the world in the last century.  Perhaps the reason that many former socialist parties, including Labour, are moving to what many call the right is because their leaders are not stupid.

    All the left have to offer is more debt to avoid austerity today.  They don’t like to talk of the geared affect that will have on our children.  It is as intellectually coherent as taking aspirin because your ankle is gangrenous.

    • DaveCitizen

       @Jaime – “Perhaps the reason that many former socialist parties, including Labour,
      are moving to what many call the right is because their leaders are not
      stupid.”

      I think the sad truth is they’re moving to the right because a increasingly large proportion of the electorate are stupid. Stupid in believing they can out compete the rest of the world and live well in a country that makes little and wastes lots on extreme inequality, unhealthy consumerism and pandering to a super rich elite. 

      • jaime taurosangastre candelas

        @ Dave Citizen,

        it’s probably a complex relationship between party and electorate, sometimes leading, sometimes following, but the direction of travel is unmistakeable for both.  There’s probably an overshoot as well to worry about, by either, and then a rebound.

        What is clear if you look at the manifestoes of social democrat parties from across Europe is that none of them stand on remotely the same platform that they did in the 1950s.  Whether they dragged the electorate with them, or were dragged, is interesting but not ultimately of relevance.

        Individual free will is the theme of our lives, and growing in parallel (and I hope it continues to grow) quick slick ad hoc social grouping on issues such as consumerism, globalisation, the environment, personal rights and so on.  The two are in parallel, but not yet both bonded to political agendas.  All of the parties of Europe are grappling with this.

  • mikestallard

    I am a right wing Eurosceptic and I want to see a referendum ASAP on withdrawal.

    It is therefore with pleasure that I read the above article. About time too! OK we differ on our social programme.

    What, I suggest, we both need is to unite and separate from the EU entirely. That way we can discuss the future of our country and make our own minds up about our social and economic policy through the ballot box.

    Aren’t we doing this already? Ask Angela Merkel (when she said that 70% of her country’s legislation came straight from Brussels), the Greeks and the Italians (who no longer can choose their own Prime Ministers). Read Our Two Presidents’ statements about the future of Europe.

    I think that we can all agree that a party – of whatever colour – that puts party before country and before the electorate’s wishes, is simply not going to last very long.

    • AlanGiles

      The truth is, I suspect, that neither main party will ever hold a referendum. Both have promised so to do and neither have – or will.

      I am a true agnostic where the EU is concerned – it is not something I spend a great deal of time worrying about TBH, but the only way I can see the UK withdrawing from the EU would be if UKIP ever got into power, or held the balance of power, and realistically that isn’t likely any time soon

Latest

  • Featured Is party politics dying out?

    Is party politics dying out?

    This week has brought the role of party members and activists back to the front pages. That’s rather unusual to be honest – and rightly so, as party members (swivel eyed and otherwise) make up only 1% of the British population. Being a party member is already a niche interest. You are somewhat odd if you’re a party member – sorry to break that to you, but of course I’m odd too (and quite possibly odder than you). What swivel-eyed [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    From: HERBERT, Nick Sent: 20 May 2013 16:29 To: HERBERT, Nick Subject: Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill – voting today   Dear Colleague Thank you for your support for the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill at Second Reading. You will be aware of the amendments tabled by Tim Loughton and others (new Clauses 10 & 11) to extend civil partnerships to heterosexual couples I have no issue with the principle of this proposal, but I am very worried that adding this measure to the [...]

    Read more →
  • News Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whilst the Westminster village has been working itself up into a lather over the rise of UKIP and when/if there should be an EU referendum, the DWP snuck out a report on the evidence of DWP league tables that we brought you recently. It’s a total whitewash. The report – which you can read here – argues that claims of a league table are entirely down to individual managers at a number of job centres. You could call it the [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Equal Marriage is the most important thing – but Labour can’t let Equal Civil Partnerships get the “long grass” treatment

    Equal Marriage is the most important thing – but Labour can’t let Equal Civil Partnerships get the “long grass” treatment

    So after toying with support for the Tim Loughton amendment over the weekend, Labour has decided to abstain on that particular amendment, and propose their own. Let’s be clear – the most important news today is that Equal Marriage will pass through the commons, and that’s a cause for huge celebration for all but an isolated minority in the Labour Party. I made clear this morning that I didn’t buy the argument that supporting the Loughton amendment would stop or [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour’s Equal marriage Bill amendment on Civil Partnerships

    Labour’s Equal marriage Bill amendment on Civil Partnerships

    Labour MPs will be encouraged to back this amendment – rather than that of Tory backbencher Tim Loughton – today: House of Commons Monday 20 May 2013 CONSIDERATION OF BILL New Amendments handed in are marked thus * MARRIAGE (SAME SEX COUPLES) BILL MANUSCRIPT AMENDMENT (a) As an Amendment to Secretary Maria Miller’s proposed New Clause (Review of civil partnership) (NC16):- Kate Green (a)(a * Line 8, leave out from ‘practicable’ to end of Clause, and insert ‘and include a [...]

    Read more →