Battersea Labour Party: asking the fundamental questions

20th March, 2012 3:09 pm

I recently attended an extraordinary meeting of Labour Party members in Battersea, which gave me cause for quiet optimism.  In a seat which only recently lost its Labour MP, and in which a number of dedicated Labour councillors work hard to hold the Tory administration to account, levels of activism among Labour members had become worryingly low.  Some months ago I spoke with the (now former) local organiser Andy Fearn, who described how matters came to a head when he arranged a canvassing session and only three people attended, himself included.

Yet the constituency membership has grown by 130 since the General Election.  And it was hardly the case that members lacked local issues on which to campaign: libraries were being threatened with closure, and the Council had just put forward plans to charge children £2.50 for using its playgrounds.

Mark Rowney was one of the two local Labour members who showed up for that day’s canvassing.  As he later recalled, they retired to the pub to discuss where things were going wrong.

“My colleague turn to me and asked, ‘why don’t people want to come out’?” he said. “But as we talked, I realised that was the wrong question. What we needed to ask was: ‘Why would people want to come out?’”

With this question in mind (and advised by Caroline Badley (Birmingham Edgbaston) and Arnie Graf, Ed Miliband’s community organising advisor), they began to focus on building relationships rather than centring their activism around tasks.  Over the following weeks, a small team of Battersea Labour activists systematically contacted new members to set up individual face-to-face meetings with them.  These meetings focused on two things: first, finding out more about what had motivated members to join the Party in the first place and, second, inviting them to attend a bigger gathering to meet informally with other local members.

So what made the recent Battersea meeting extraordinary? First, turnout.  The turnout of 60+ local members, in a seat whose membership is dwarfed by many other London CLPs, brought a bulk of the membership together in a way that rarely happens in our local parties anymore.  The atmosphere was buzzing as a result – a number of previously inactive members with whom I spoke talked with excitement about what they could achieve within their local party.

Second, the emphasis on relationships.  The meeting was relational in tone and form – it centred around people sharing food, drink and stories, to build individual relationships which made us all feel part of something bigger than ourselves.  This focus on what motivates people to act (i.e. identifying their self-interest) has transformed the way Battersea activists approach their organising.  In turn, it has also laid the groundwork not just for more people joining the CLP; crucially, it has provided a means for more people joining in.

Of course, the real test of this work is still to come.  Will massively increased turnout at one event convert into more action on the ground? I suspect that an important element of keeping the momentum and converting it into action will be for the Battersea organisers to heed their own advice: ask not why people didn’t come to you. Rather, start with their self-interest and build the relationship from there.

  • ovaljason

    Kathryn

    This is an excellent initiative by local members and I wish you the best of luck with it.

    As to how this model of activism could be used elsewhere….Well there is one simple question to ask and only one person to ask it of.

    The question to Ed Miliband is ‘what have you done with M4C?

    Remember them?  Movement4Change?  A movement of local activists, bringing the party together, based around strong local bonds and campaigning on Labour-minded issues.

    M4C is up there with those other landmark projects –  Refounding Labour, the policy review and new Executive Committee – that EdM has made such a jolly good job of managing.

    He’s ace that Ed Miliband, isn’t he?

  • Chilbaldi

    Yes! We need fewer stuffy meetings where the old worthies gather to discuss standing orders, and more informal social gatherings with food and drink. Make it a forum for people to meet each other and discuss, not the current set up of many CLPs

    • treborc

      I suspect the people living on the street will use it as a soup of food kitchen

  • http://twitter.com/Alex_Ross_Shaw Alex Ross-Shaw

    You had a crisis when only three people turned up to canvass? I dream of having three people to canvass with! 😉

Latest

  • Featured News Labour call for “annual equal pay checks” to see which companies are paying women less than men

    Labour call for “annual equal pay checks” to see which companies are paying women less than men

    Labour have called for an annual equal pay check to see which British companies are paying women less than men. Tomorrow in an opposition day debate Gloria de Piero, the shadow equalities minister, will say that there needs to be an “annual equal pay check”. She will say that this should be carried out by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). As of next year, companies that employ more than 250 have to publish figures showing the pay gap […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured “Ed was wrong”: Criticising Miliband shouldn’t be off limits in the leadership debate

    “Ed was wrong”: Criticising Miliband shouldn’t be off limits in the leadership debate

    Ed Miliband yesterday said that it was perfectly acceptable for those to debate the Labour Party’s future to criticise him. He has to say that, really – it would come across a little odd if he deemed himself above it all. Nevertheless, by saying it, he makes it harder for him to be criticised. He appears magnanimous and self-effacing; exactly the qualities that have endeared him so much to the party’s grassroots. So let me take a moment to praise the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Unions The fate of trade unions and our party are inextricably linked

    The fate of trade unions and our party are inextricably linked

    Britain has the most restrictive anti-union laws in western Europe, and this government is about to tighten them further. We need to understand the effect this has: to increase inequality. Professors Wilkinson & Pickett, authors of The Spirit Level, showed last year in an excellent Fabian Society pamphlet that the pattern of UK inequality “reflects first the strengthening, and then the weakening, of the labour movement during the 20th century”. Now the Tories’ propose a minimum 50% threshold on union […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured The public are fed up of carbon copy politicians – why I’m backing Andy

    The public are fed up of carbon copy politicians – why I’m backing Andy

    “If the public had been voting the outcome would have been different. Your time will come.”  Those were the words I wrote to Andy Burnham in September 2010 – days after the outcome of the last leadership election. I remember putting the note in the internal post box in Portcullis House, reflecting on the weird ways of Westminster. Having only been there a few months I’d already managed to assume the tradition of writing “nice comments about colleagues” down on […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Miliband says leadership contenders are “perfectly entitled” to criticise him

    Miliband says leadership contenders are “perfectly entitled” to criticise him

    Ed Miliband says he takes “full responsibility” for Labour’s defeat in May, and that as part of the debate around the party’s future, leadership candidates are “perfectly entitled” to criticise his record. Speaking on BBC 5 Live this morning, Miliband said (quote via Politics Home): “I lost the election, Labour lost the election. I took full responsibility for that. People will have their advice, their criticisms and their views and they are perfectly entitled to do that. I think my […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit