If we can’t beat this lot, we shouldn’t be in politics

March 29, 2012 2:16 pm

“the band is awful

and so are the tunes”

Tom Waits , Pasties and A G-String.

“If we can’t take this lot apart in the next few years we shouldn’t be in the business of politics at all.”

Tony Blair , 2006.

It turned out we couldn’t, but they failed to win a majority anyway.

Still, the Liberal Democrats decided that while we were still in the business of politics we should most definitely not be in the business of government* and now “this lot” are busy making absolute idiots of themselves, about everything.

What are they doing wrong? Let’s go from tiny to huge:

1. Pasty Tax: If you’re going to do tax reform, do it in a single big bang, not lots of little bits and bobs, that just allows every interest group around to plead their case. Frankly, I don’t have a clue why VAT applies to pies sold at different temperatures. But making a piddly change like that was bound to cause an uproar.

2. Party funding: The British political funding system is borked, and we need to fix it. Every party has idiots, and we’re grateful when these things are exposed. We’re very, very, sorry. Here are some sincere ideas for making it better. It’s not that hard is it?

3. Petrol: Government’s exist to contain crises, not stoke them. So popping up telling people to be very concerned is usually a bad idea, unless they really, really, should be concerned.

3. 45p: I get the political imperative. George Osborne wants to show his party this is really a Tory government, so he can one day become Prime Minister/ensure the Tory right supports David Cameron (delete according to cynicism). Fine.

That means he needs to cut tax. Fine.

He also wants to set a political trap for Labour. Fine

So cut Corporation tax another point, with an extra cut post-dated to 2015 dependent on that £10 billion in Welfare savings being found.

Or fiddle with NI contributions, again, with further reduction dependent on Post-2015 savings.

Or pledge to raise the personal allowance even higher.

All of these would be Tax cuts that put Labour in a genuinely tricky position.

Hell, once the economy’s growing again, you can take the 50p tax rate, bake it in a pie made of “I was right and you were wrong” and slap the whole confection right into Ed Miliband’s horrified face, live on TV. The voters would forgive that, if the economy was robust.

But whatever you do, whatever you do, don’t cut the blinking top rate of tax until you’ve been proved right on the economy, and are being garlanded as a national Saviour. Once that’s happenend, you can let Thatcherism rip if you want, but until there’s a healthy growth rate, the line is broadest shoulders, heaviest burden, remember?

Cutting tax for the rich when things are rocky for the country is the Tory equivalent of feeding Gremlins after midnight. No good can come of it**.

Right now, George, your whole political project is wrapped up with the idea of getting Britain moving again. That’s where your every energy should be. Giving a poxy tax cut to a few millionaires doesn’t do that and it doesn’t even put Labour in a particularly difficult trap. If there’s one thing the Labour party is good at it, it is following moral outrage with a reluctant accommodation with the facts on the ground. Watch us lambast you for being out of touch, then wash our hands of the whole affair.

Pasty taxes? Top rate tax cuts? The reason you’re in a mess George, is that’ you’ve forgotten that your main job is to get Britain growing, not be lauded for clever tactics.

You might not believe government can make the economy grow, fair enough, but you’re the Chancellor. Even if you reckon it’s all make believe and fairy dust while the magic of capitalism does its thing off stage, you still want them to be looking at the exciting smoke and mirrors you’ve designed, not at tears in your threadbare stage costume.

This government? Pfft. It’s the gang that couldn’t shoot straight.

If we can’t beat this lot, we shouldn’t be in politics.

* The fact the Liberal Democrats felt that while joining the Tories would be politically painful, joining with us would be political suicide, should, you know, tell us something, and not that Liberal Democrats are self-harmers.

** Don’t you quote Howe at me, sunshine. You’re two years in now, not cutting the top rate from 83% to 60% in the optimistic early days. This is like 81, and Howe didn’t cut tax then, did he? No, he put them up. Lawson cut top rate in the middle of the boom.

This post was first published here.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eton-Mess/100002857160938 Eton Mess

    You forgot the slow-motion car crash that is the Health & Social Care Bill.

    The NHS reforms must have set a record for unpopularity amonst health professionals too.

    • LondonStatto

      That would be the Health and Social Care Act 2012, now that it has received Royal Assent.I would take the opinion of “health professionals” a little more seriously if, for example, the BMA had not opposed every significant change to the NHS since its creation – including its creation!Still, the Bill is now an Act, so the argument can move on.

  • http://owsblog.blogspot.com Span Ows

    …and don’t forget ALL the media are also hounding the coalition…so, can you do it?

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.blott Matthew Blott

    Brilliant

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I think some of the LD’s are ideologically more suited to coalition with the Tories – but also, the numbers didn’t add up in any case

    All history now, but remember that the election will be in 2015. And things can change…..so important to keep a clear head and ‘keep calm’

  • externalities

    It was the electorate, not the Liberal Democrats who “decided” Labour should “not be in the business of government”. It’s a fact many seem to like to forget but it would have taken a 5-party coalition to give Lib-Lab even the smallest majority. Better luck in 2015!

  • Alexwilliamz

    This government is RECKLESS and AMATEURISH these are the kinds of words that should be repeated as often as possible in interviews and soundbites. This is how what the coalition have done to reenforce the message the the recession was ENTIRELY down to Labour economic policy. We need to be clear that this government are chances and behaving in reckless way with almost all their reforms, which tend to the ideological, lack a substantive evidence or even research and are often executed with limited strategic planning. The fiasco that was education policy in the first year or so, the health and welfare bill, the talking down of the economy and stoking up of fear which is partially responsible for the collapse of confidence. It all adds up to a car crash of a government who are now pretty much gambling everything on a decent recovery at some time in the next 3 years and a big tax cut in the 2015 budget. Their assumption being that recoveries have always followed recessions within 3 or 4 years, haven’t they?

    The real question is why have the opposition failed to really expose them, by now we should really be getting into our stride, sure Labour may still lack credibility over the economy with the public but I’m not sure any party will be able to claim any credibility in terms of economic management. It is probably time to fight back with coherent messages about where Labour did well in managing the economy especially during the darkest days of the credit crunch.

  • Brumanuensis

    And this, Hopi Sen, is an example of why you’re one my favourite ‘New’ Labour writers. Our nation is mired in economic stagnation and gimmicky political stunts are the only thing the Chancellor of the Exchequer can manage. God help us.     

  • LondonStatto

    If cutting the top rate to 45% was such a bad idea, wouldn’t Labour have voted against it?

Latest

  • News Unison Conference 2013 Unison set out their expectations for a Labour government

    Unison set out their expectations for a Labour government

    Unison General Secretary Dave Prentis set out his tests for continuing to support Labour this afternoon. Speaking at their conference in Liverpool, Prentis said: For too long we’ve built the careers of Labour politicians, only to be let down when we needed them most. I don’t want to hear Labour apologising for past mistakes, I want to see a clear agenda from Labour for the future. We must not support a Labour Government that does not : put an end [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Scotland Why on earth shouldn’t Nigel Farage visit Scotland?

    Why on earth shouldn’t Nigel Farage visit Scotland?

    You’ve got to admire Nigel Farage. Like a comedian who’s already died on stage at the Glasgow Empire, he’s put on his “optimistic” hat and chosen to return to Scotland to campaign for UKIP. His last visit, you will recall, was memorable for his being forced to seek refuge in an Edinburgh pub from a mob of nationalists and trots shouting “SCUM!” at him as he tried to convey his message (a tad harsh, I thought. But I suppose “gentleman [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment

    Labour needs more than a few warm words on the environment, energy security and climate change

    It seems that with the announcements of their intention to end universality in social security and accept the Coalition’s spending envelopes, Labour are gradually beginning to articulate what the Labour Party’s 2015 manifesto will look like. While much has been said on social security, general economic direction and housing shortages; there has been little said on the environment, energy security and climate change. Other than a few warm words from Mary Creagh MP in LabourList’s ‘One Nation Labour: Debating the Future’ [...]

    Read more →
  • News 5,000 soldiers face redundancy – Media roundup: June 18th, 2013

    5,000 soldiers face redundancy – Media roundup: June 18th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this (and much more) in your inbox. You can sign up here. 5,000 soldiers face redundancy Thousands of members of the armed forces will receive redundancy letters tomorrow – as Government defence cuts continue to bite. Up to 5,300 serving soldiers in the Army will lose their jobs – including [...]

    Read more →
  • News Has David Cameron lost the plot?

    Has David Cameron lost the plot?

    Once upon a time David Cameron was known for his deft handling of the public mood. Not anymore. Last night, he tweeted: This is the menu for the #G8UK dinner. I’ll chair a discussion on tax, trade, transparency and Syria at 830 tonight pic.twitter.com/GAWDxvEDkI — David Cameron (@David_Cameron) June 17, 2013 This is a Prime Minister who is often lambasted as “out of touch”, at a time when half a million people are being driven to using Foodbanks because they [...]

    Read more →