Why PMQs is like Question Time (and both are rubbish)

8th March, 2012 8:02 pm

I don’t watch Prime Minister’s Questions. Never. Wednesday is my only day off and I’d rather have a long lie in. From what I read on The Blogs, it doesn’t sound like I’m missing a great deal. Every week, there’ll be another piece bemoaning either the childish behaviour of our elected officials, Cameron parading his arrogance, planted questions, Bercow parading his arrogance or Miliband’s inability to score any cheap party political points (which is, as I understand, the point of PMQs). LabourList’s own editor Mark Ferguson seems so unhappy with it all that his continued viewership can now only be ascribed to a deep-rooted sadism. This would also explain his penchant for door-knocking naked.

Yesterday was no different, with Mark and Dan Hodges both lamenting the fact that the sombre, serious tone that began the half-hour affair was soon made to look insincere as, once more, the House of Commons fell to the occasion. Mark’s campaign to get MPs to bloody well get their act together is admirable, but undoubtedly doomed. When John Bercow says that “the public” don’t want to see MPs behave in the way they so often do in the chamber, he might well be right; but when “the public” are given the chance, things aren’t as different as you might like to believe.

I don’t watch Question Time. Never. This is because, unlike Mark Ferguson, I am not a sadist.* I can’t watch it. It makes me angry that no one wants to listen to anything anyone else has to say and depressed that at the only time that people can properly interact with politicians in a public forum, this is the forum in which is has to be held.

Question Time is a stain on our democracy. Nothing in this world makes me unhappier than Question Time, other than unnecessary exaggeration that trivialises real tragedies in this world. Those are definitely the two worst things in life.

It is simultaneously the Roman Colosseum and the Christmas panto of the modern political world. A rag-tag group of cowed politicians, ambitious commentators and baffled celebs are paraded to prove their worth in front of a baying mob. Either they are vindicated or they are damned. Move over reasoned political debate, you are not welcome here. Just shout your opinion, and keep it snappy. No time to go into detail, but let’s solve Iraq NOW.

What is supposed to be achieved here? Is anything learned, anything gained? Are governments held to account or charlatans exposed?

The idea that Question Time is any better than PMQs is a sham. It’s politics for the people who know they’re angry but never know why. The shouting is ceaseless, the screaming and jeering regardless of events. The MPs are more in touch than we’d like to admit.

I’m looking at the pigs, and I’m looking at the people, and I can no longer tell them apart.

*I would like to point out that Mark Ferguson, Editor of LabourList, is not a sadist.

  • Slakah

    I hate to sound like a snob, but I do believe Any Questions to be a lot better than the both of them.

  • SR819

    Can’t argue with any of that tbh. The same thing could be said for Ed Miliband’s treatment on Victoria Derbyshire’s radio phone-in. I think there’s such a strong anti-politics/politician mood in this country that it’s difficult for Ed to get his points across, many of which are actually decent (although too orthodox still IMO) Not many people want to listen to Ed because they despise politicians, and would prefer to have a rant at them. We need to change these attitudes tbh. An anti-politics atmosphere does the Labour Party no favours whatsoever, because it opens the door for the Conservatives to say, “let’s leave everything to the market, because government is the problem”.

  • Winston_from_the_Ministry

    I don’t care for PMQs, but QT is a great watch.

  • robertcp

    Conor, do you mean that Mark is a masochist?  Your piece seems to be arguing that MPs are no better or worse than the people that elect them.  This could be seen as the point of democracy.  However, I do share some of your irritation with people who do not want to hear reasoned argument.

  • Brumanuensis

    Very enjoyable as always and very true too.

    One pedantic quibble: surely you meant to describe Mark Ferguson as a ‘masochist’*, unless he forces others to watch with him, in which case he would be a ‘sadist’*. Confronting voters on the doorstep naked would arguably be ‘sado-masochism’*, although this would depend on how unpleasant his nakedness was for the voter in question. But enough of this conjecture.

    *I am not implying anything about Mark Ferguson’s proclivities

  • Jeff_Harvey

    Question Time could be much improved by inviting a much better quality of guest onto the show to speak and air their opinions; much the same thing could be said in respect to Prime Minister’s Questions.

  • Colchester1648

    However, Conor, Mark is a ‘masochist’ not a sadist as he likes to have pain inflicted upon him. You will be able to get advice on such, and perhaps an invitation to try it from the following address:

    Mr G Osborne
    11 Downing Street
    London
    SW1A 2AB

  • AlanGiles

    Yes there is much less playing to the gallery being on radio, and unlike QT there is not the “selection process” employed – anybody can apply for tickets, But you have to do so by March 13th.

    As a matter of fact, for those in the London area who may be interested, the edition of April 13th is being transmitted from the Radio Theatre at Broadcasting House Portland Place (the old Concert Hall). It is transmitted live and if you want to apply for tickets go:-

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/showsandtours/shows/shows/any_questions_apr12

Latest

  • Featured News Unions Anti-trade union legislation could face legal challenge for contravening human rights

    Anti-trade union legislation could face legal challenge for contravening human rights

    Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is ready to raise the prospect of challenging the Tories’ proposed anti-trade union laws in the courts, claiming it might contravene human rights legislation. Cooper says she has received legal advice that points to potential breaches of Article 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights, which preserves the right of freedom of association, including trade unions. The leadership contender will accuse the Conservatives of trying to use their position to cripple the opposition with […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour have been “in denial” about threat from UKIP, says Dan Jarvis

    Labour have been “in denial” about threat from UKIP, says Dan Jarvis

    Dan Jarvis has slammed Labour for being “in denial” about the threat caused by UKIP, in a new report published this weekend. ‘Reconnecting Labour’, which was commissioned by Andy Burnham in July as part of his campaign to become leader, looks specifically at how Labour wins back votes lost to the anti-EU party. Jarvis raises concerns that the EU referendum a new high-profile platform that could cause further problems for Labour. He says that Labour were too relaxed about the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The Labour leadership contest: too much politics and not enough personality

    The Labour leadership contest: too much politics and not enough personality

    Our recent prime ministers were not elected to lead their parties following general election defeats, and there are many problems with electing leaders whilst on the rebound. One of the biggest is that everyone is still in General Election Mode, presenting manifestos rather than their qualities as a leader. Policies and ideas are not wedded to any one person – any candidate could institute a policy suggested by any other candidate. Having good ideas qualifies one for the top table, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment What lessons does Lynton Crosby have for Labour?

    What lessons does Lynton Crosby have for Labour?

    After May’s general election, it appeared everyone in the party who tweeted or blogged was sure they knew why Labour had lost. By some weird coincidence, these opinions always seemed to mirror the prejudices of the author. You know the type of thing – our policies were too right wing, our policies were too left wing, our policies were too centrist, etc. Not very enlightening. So, to get a more balanced view, I turned to Lynton Crosby. I appreciate that’s […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour is in “mortal danger” – “we need to save it again”, says Peter Mandelson

    Labour is in “mortal danger” – “we need to save it again”, says Peter Mandelson

    Peter Mandelson has argued that Labour is in “mortal danger” . In an article in the Financial Times (£), the former cabinet minister and Labour campaigns director has warned against a Jeremy Corbyn victory. If the Islington North MP wins the leadership election, “that would be a very bad outcome for anyone who cares about fairness in our society or Britain’s place in the world”, Mandelson writes. Mandelson has called for a tightening of the rules over the leadership election […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit