Why PMQs is like Question Time (and both are rubbish)

March 8, 2012 8:02 pm

I don’t watch Prime Minister’s Questions. Never. Wednesday is my only day off and I’d rather have a long lie in. From what I read on The Blogs, it doesn’t sound like I’m missing a great deal. Every week, there’ll be another piece bemoaning either the childish behaviour of our elected officials, Cameron parading his arrogance, planted questions, Bercow parading his arrogance or Miliband’s inability to score any cheap party political points (which is, as I understand, the point of PMQs). LabourList’s own editor Mark Ferguson seems so unhappy with it all that his continued viewership can now only be ascribed to a deep-rooted sadism. This would also explain his penchant for door-knocking naked.

Yesterday was no different, with Mark and Dan Hodges both lamenting the fact that the sombre, serious tone that began the half-hour affair was soon made to look insincere as, once more, the House of Commons fell to the occasion. Mark’s campaign to get MPs to bloody well get their act together is admirable, but undoubtedly doomed. When John Bercow says that “the public” don’t want to see MPs behave in the way they so often do in the chamber, he might well be right; but when “the public” are given the chance, things aren’t as different as you might like to believe.

I don’t watch Question Time. Never. This is because, unlike Mark Ferguson, I am not a sadist.* I can’t watch it. It makes me angry that no one wants to listen to anything anyone else has to say and depressed that at the only time that people can properly interact with politicians in a public forum, this is the forum in which is has to be held.

Question Time is a stain on our democracy. Nothing in this world makes me unhappier than Question Time, other than unnecessary exaggeration that trivialises real tragedies in this world. Those are definitely the two worst things in life.

It is simultaneously the Roman Colosseum and the Christmas panto of the modern political world. A rag-tag group of cowed politicians, ambitious commentators and baffled celebs are paraded to prove their worth in front of a baying mob. Either they are vindicated or they are damned. Move over reasoned political debate, you are not welcome here. Just shout your opinion, and keep it snappy. No time to go into detail, but let’s solve Iraq NOW.

What is supposed to be achieved here? Is anything learned, anything gained? Are governments held to account or charlatans exposed?

The idea that Question Time is any better than PMQs is a sham. It’s politics for the people who know they’re angry but never know why. The shouting is ceaseless, the screaming and jeering regardless of events. The MPs are more in touch than we’d like to admit.

I’m looking at the pigs, and I’m looking at the people, and I can no longer tell them apart.

*I would like to point out that Mark Ferguson, Editor of LabourList, is not a sadist.

  • Slakah

    I hate to sound like a snob, but I do believe Any Questions to be a lot better than the both of them.

  • SR819

    Can’t argue with any of that tbh. The same thing could be said for Ed Miliband’s treatment on Victoria Derbyshire’s radio phone-in. I think there’s such a strong anti-politics/politician mood in this country that it’s difficult for Ed to get his points across, many of which are actually decent (although too orthodox still IMO) Not many people want to listen to Ed because they despise politicians, and would prefer to have a rant at them. We need to change these attitudes tbh. An anti-politics atmosphere does the Labour Party no favours whatsoever, because it opens the door for the Conservatives to say, “let’s leave everything to the market, because government is the problem”.

  • Winston_from_the_Ministry

    I don’t care for PMQs, but QT is a great watch.

  • robertcp

    Conor, do you mean that Mark is a masochist?  Your piece seems to be arguing that MPs are no better or worse than the people that elect them.  This could be seen as the point of democracy.  However, I do share some of your irritation with people who do not want to hear reasoned argument.

  • Brumanuensis

    Very enjoyable as always and very true too.

    One pedantic quibble: surely you meant to describe Mark Ferguson as a ‘masochist’*, unless he forces others to watch with him, in which case he would be a ‘sadist’*. Confronting voters on the doorstep naked would arguably be ‘sado-masochism’*, although this would depend on how unpleasant his nakedness was for the voter in question. But enough of this conjecture.

    *I am not implying anything about Mark Ferguson’s proclivities

  • Jeff_Harvey

    Question Time could be much improved by inviting a much better quality of guest onto the show to speak and air their opinions; much the same thing could be said in respect to Prime Minister’s Questions.

  • Colchester1648

    However, Conor, Mark is a ‘masochist’ not a sadist as he likes to have pain inflicted upon him. You will be able to get advice on such, and perhaps an invitation to try it from the following address:

    Mr G Osborne
    11 Downing Street
    London
    SW1A 2AB

  • AlanGiles

    Yes there is much less playing to the gallery being on radio, and unlike QT there is not the “selection process” employed – anybody can apply for tickets, But you have to do so by March 13th.

    As a matter of fact, for those in the London area who may be interested, the edition of April 13th is being transmitted from the Radio Theatre at Broadcasting House Portland Place (the old Concert Hall). It is transmitted live and if you want to apply for tickets go:-

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/showsandtours/shows/shows/any_questions_apr12

Latest

  • Comment Make National Community Service compulsory

    Make National Community Service compulsory

    Last month David Cameron called for all 18- to 21-year-olds who have failed to find a job or a place in training to be forced to undertake community work. Under Tory plans those aged between 18 and 21 who have not had a job for six months will be barred from claiming benefit unless they agree to start an apprenticeship or complete community work. The plan is designed to ensure that the 50,000 young people “most at risk of starting […]

    Read more →
  • News London Mayoral candidate attempts to crowdfund cost of campaign

    London Mayoral candidate attempts to crowdfund cost of campaign

    Labour candidates for Mayor will be trying to fund their campaigns in all manner of ways – but Christian Wolmar (the transport expert who joined the race first and remains the only candidate who isn’t an elected politician) has gone down the crowdfunding route. Wolmar is trying to raise £3,000 for his campaign by next week – and has currently raised nearly half of that sum. Although as with all crowdfunding, he must raise the whole sum or he gets […]

    Read more →
  • News “State sanctioned abuse” has taken place Yarl’s Wood, says Cooper

    “State sanctioned abuse” has taken place Yarl’s Wood, says Cooper

    Yvette Cooper, the Shadow Home Secretary, has asked an urgent question in the Commons about abuse allegations at Yarl’s Wood. Yarl’s Wood is an immigration detention centre that opened in 2001. Ever since then guards (who come from private company Serco, which runs the facilitiy) are have faced serious accusations that there has been ongoing mistreatment of the people detained in the facility. This includes reports of sexual abuse and degrading treatment. On Monday, Channel 4 aired a documentary which had […]

    Read more →
  • News 75% of Labour PPCs want Trident gone, poll finds

    75% of Labour PPCs want Trident gone, poll finds

    75% of Labour PPCs want to see Trident scrapped, according to information collected by the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). CND have surveyed 79 Labour prospective parliamentary candidates (PPCs) – which includes both current MPs and new candidates. Of those asked, 75%  said they wouldn’t vote to renew Trident. This is roughly a quarter more than those who said the same in a ComRes poll for the BBC Sunday Politics in September last year (which surveyed 73 people). Meanwhile, in the CND […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Immigration detention: it’s time for a new approach

    Immigration detention: it’s time for a new approach

    Immigration is perhaps one of the most divisive issues in politics today. So for MPs and Peers from the three main parties – including those who have served within the Cabinet and Shadow Cabinet during this Parliament – to speak with one voice on a particularly controversial issue of immigration policy is remarkable. All the more so when that voice is for radical change. But that is the conclusion of the ‘Inquiry into the use of Immigration Detention in the […]

    Read more →