What the Tories get up to when they hope no-one is looking

April 20, 2012 11:08 am

There are not many times I welcome a Conservative Party press release, but today is one! The release slams me personally for my European Parliament report on human rights in the EU. It states:

“(Richard Howitt MEP) angered Conservative opponents by insisting on adding a clause to the report condemning…the UK for what he described as an “obstructionist attitude” in negotiations over EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights.”

In the week the Tories are pushing reforms to the Court which Liberty have described as tantamount to Britain leaving the European Convention, my report – based on direct briefings on the inter-governmental negotiations on the EU itself signing up to the convention – exposed the huge chasm between the Government claims in public whilst in private doing the very opposite.

EU accession is a treaty obligation to which the official Foreign Office position statement says Britain is fully committed.

On Tuesday Lib Dems scoffed at my criticism and, maintaining their role as apologists for the Tories, persuaded their allies to vote against. By today both the Tory release and speeches from their official spokesperson on the floor of the European Parliament confirm Tory representatives are doing everything possible to obstruct the agreement, openly celebrating the fact they are reneging on their own published position.   

Indeed my report itself seems to have provoked a new standard for the Tories in saying one thing at Westminster, whilst doing another in the European Parliament – when they hope no-one is looking.

Whilst Cameron gives soft interviews in the Pink Paper, not one Tory MEP voted for a clause proposed condemning attempts to include homosexuality as a ”mental disorder,” in the international classification of diseases.

A fairly anodyne clause supporting “women’s equality and children’s rights” was opposed by thirteen Tory MEPs including one woman. Half of Conservative MEPs failed to support my backing for EU aid to sexual health programmes in poor countries, even though I quoted the specific words “to help women not to die in pregnancy.”  Of two who actually voted against, incredibly one is a doctor. 

What happened to Cameron’s attempts to attract women voters or seek a new image by suddenly claiming to be development-friendly?

The Tories fail to distinguish between my condemnation of their party and Labour MEPs backing our country.

In the chamber after the vote one Tory MEP rose to his feet to say:

“In Britain human rights are not seen as universal…they’re seen as meaningless.”

By seeking to inflame British public opinion against human rights, the Tory Party is playing with fire.  This statement is a profound misunderstanding of international human rights law and risks bringing Britain ourselves in to illegality. When I rose to my own feet in the chamber, it was to say that the Tories should apologise to all who fought in the second world war for freedoms on our continent that they seem now to want to threaten.

Britain was isolated in Europe then.  it is the Tory Party which is isolated in Europe now.  

Tory MEPs were among only 28 MEPs to vote against my report. I and my Labour colleagues were with the majority of 580 MEPs from 27 Member States who supported it, and who support human rights as universal, not subject to an opt in or an opt out, not a matter of where you live but a matter of how you live.

Labour is watching in Brussels and Strasbourg and we will make sure David Cameron’s MEPs are held to account. 

Richard Howitt MEP is Labour Member of the European Parliament for the East of England and the Parliament’s Annual Human Rights Rapporteur

  • http://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    I don’t think the Tories are trying to inflame the public on human rights issues.  In the House yesterday they were reflecting the real feelings of the people of the UK that the ECHR is higher than our own top court of the land.  Something that I, and many believe should not happen.  

    It is about time that MPs, MEPs, Cllrs reflect the views of those they are elected to & purport to represent instead of them serving themselves.

    • treborc1

      Well of course a lot of people not the majority I suspect think human rights are important, not sure they agree  about Muslim cleric Abu Qatada, many will think he should have been kept in jail, after all we can put away people for stealing six bottles of water for four years, why is this bloke not  doing ten or twelve years in this country.

      The real problem of course both labour and the Tories would like to see the back of this bloke, which begs the question why was he allowed in here in the first place.

      But Jordan is not the greatest place for human rights.

    • Cgilbey141

       Presumably the fact that UK citizens can be deported for infringing US law in their  own country does not make their court higher than ours?

  • Savetheehrc

    This is no surprise to staff at the Equality and Human Rights Commission which is scheduled to lose 63% of its original budget and most of that by the end of this year.  This will result in a 72% cut to staff and the closure of our helpline and grants programme which funds law centres, CABs etc who provide advice and representation to the victims of discrimination.  The EHRC is also the statutory body responsible for promoting the HRA.  The Govt also plan to reform our powers following a consultation last year.  This is despite the fact that they have privately admitted that over 90% of respondents disagreed with the proposals.   
    In a recent article for the Industrial Law Journal Sir Bob Hepple QC states that the Commissions ‘ability to use effectively even its restricted powers will be compromised by severe cuts in its annual budget’, cuts which represent a loss of nearly two-thirds of its initial resources and staffing.  This leads him to conclude that ‘the Commission will be grossly under-resourced’.  He goes on to say that the proposals to restrict the EHRC to its core functions ‘will reduce the legal competence to undertake effective strategic enforcement of equality, and to assist victims of unlawful discrimination, harassment and victimisation, and are likely to limit the EHRC’s future independence’.  
    http://ilj.oxfordjournals..org/content/40/4/315.short Sandra Osborne MP has secured a Westminster Hall debate on the crisis at the EHRC next Tuesday 24 April at 1pm.  We would like MPs to support her   

  • Stoprisk

    The ConDem regime is exporting deadly weapons to Al Qaeda supporting Saudi Arabia.
    They are endangering our HEROES in Afghanistan and Cameron thinks F1 in dictatorship
    Bahrain is OK. Well, I can tell and so can we all here Al Qaeda Cameron is NOT OK !
    Stop This Terrorist Risk and vote ConDems OUT !

Latest

  • News Labour MPs and Equal Marriage – analysis, and some special mentions

    Labour MPs and Equal Marriage – analysis, and some special mentions

    It was good to see the vast majority of Labour MPs voting for marriage equality yesterday, although here are some special mentions – Iain McKenzie, Frank Roy & Mike Wood - voted FOR after voting against in the 2nd reading Anne Begg, Gordon Brown, Bill Esterson, Pat Glass, Michael Meacher, Ian Mearns, Yasmin Qureshi, Virenda Sharma, Shaun Woodward - these MPs didn’t vote in the 2nd reading, but all voted FOR this evening (not all abstentions, a number were unable to attend [...]

    Read more →
  • News More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    More evidence of that slick Downing Street media operation…

    Ed Miliband is addressing Google’s Big Tent, and is expected to attack them over tax avoidance. So the slick Downing Street operation presumably want to get out ahead of that, right? Not quite. Here’s a selection of the headlines from Tuesday’s papers: ‘Stop moralising about tax avoidance, PM told’ – Guardian p.23 ‘Tougher tax rules would cost jobs, minister warns’ – Financial Times p.3 ‘Cameron avoids showdown over Google tax row’ – Times p.15 ‘No taxing questions as PM lets [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →