Cameron’s family relaunch at odds with new research showing sharp rise in anxieties about kids’ future prospects

May 14, 2012 6:17 pm

David Cameron, like Tony Blair before him, was initially successful in positioning himself as what voters described as a ‘family man’. Despite his privileged education and background, this was a point of connection with middle England. Like them, he cared about his kids. Like them, he put their future first.

I remember conducting discussion groups with disaffected swing voters after the 1992 election. They felt let down by Labour. They believed that Labour did not understand their drive to make their children’s lives better than theirs had been. Blair understood how ‘bettering yourself’ was not a luxury but an imperative, and he helped Labour to get it too.

In the early days of Cameron’s leadership he also reached out to aspirational families with promises about inheritance tax and schools.

Clearly, against a backdrop of recession, maintaining optimism is hard. BritainThinks’ new poll shows fewer agree that ‘my children will be better off than I am’ than they did at the end of the coalition’s first few months (from 35% in 2010 to 27%). We also see a 9% increase is those who agree ‘I’m worried that the next generation won’t have the opportunities that mine had’.

More worrying still for the Government is the 71% who now agree ‘I’m worried that there’s a generation of young people who may never be able to get jobs because of the recession’. This is up 8% since December 2010. Women voters – already the biggest critics of Government performance – are even more likely to agree at 75%.

As Cameron tries to feel his way forward after disastrous local election results, refocusing on the family is an obvious strategic move. However, most parents see looking out for their kids’ future prospects as their core responsibility. Failure to help with this – or worse still, placing obstacles in the way will make any promise about support for families seem hollow.

Deborah Mattinson is the Founding Director of Britain Thinks

  • geedee0520

     Meanwhile – in Greece….

    Of course everyone is worried about future prospects for their children – they recognise that the non-stop growth in living standards has now transferred to the East & Africa. We should be pleased about this (?) as this means more people are being brought up to a relatively decent standard of living. Capitalism seems to work!

    • Quiet_Sceptic

      You give the impression that improvement in our living standards has to come at the cost of other countries or vice versa, yet a lot of the quality of living issues for young people are UK specific:

      – Cost of housing is a big issue for most young people. Other countries manage to provide plenty of affordable housing for their population, our issues are due to our planning policies and behavior of the housing industry.

      – Cost of higher education – we’re free as a country to chose how we allocate the cost of higher education across society and individuals , we could afford to shift the balance of cost back toward the state and society as a whole rather than placing it solely on the individual student at a point in their life when they have least capability of paying for it.

      • jaime taurosangastre candelas

        I would like a broader set of thinking on the cost of higher education.  I have only my own experience to guide me, but I think there is a model worth examining.  (And I have myself two children who will within a dozen years be of university age, so no doubt a vested interest).

        Britain had the concept of “National Service” until about 1960.  That was focussed on the military.  This could be changed and updated to a voluntary form of National Service, in which payment of university tuition fees is exchanged for commitment to public service for an equal number of years.  Being voluntary, there would be nothing to stop someone from electing to repay fees on the same basis they now do and to join the private sector on leaving university; equally if someone wants to study (for example) geography, then spending 3 years after graduating as a survey officer for DEFRA gives back to society, the graduate pays no fees, and we can all benefit.  To an extent, the NHS already does this with nurses and doctors, but I will acknowledge that is a monopolistic market.

        This would need a lot of research to validate, and it may well be that there are only 2 places in the public service for every ten interested applicants, but even so, I believe the concept has merits and benefits on both sides of the equation.

    • Dave Postles

      Foxconn, Wintek and the sweatshops in Bangladesh are recruiting …

  • derek

    Going underground!

  • http://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    The polls don’t lie apparently although should be taken with the proverbial pinch of salt. The figures may say more people are worried for their children under the Coalition than before but until there is a credible alternative voters will not necessarily vote for another party.

Latest

  • News Analysis shows where the Greens are the biggest threat to Labour

    Analysis shows where the Greens are the biggest threat to Labour

    The polls have recently shown a rising level of support for the Greens. This poses a big threat to Labour. With the general election fast approaching, Rob Ford, who’s a senior lecturer at the University of Manchester and co-author of Revolt on the Right, has analysed exactly where the threat from the Greens is at its highest. He’s identified 22 seats with the highest amount of people who could move from voting Labour to Green, including current Labour-held seats such as […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Labour commit to Home Rule Bill within first 100 days of government

    Labour commit to Home Rule Bill within first 100 days of government

    Margaret Currant, Shadow Scottish Secretary, has today announced that within 100 days of coming into Government, Labour would lay Scotland’s Home Rule Bill in the House of Commons. As well as pledging to do this, Curran has also outlined other devolution priorities. They include: A full review of how Westminster and Scottish Governments can best work together for Scottish people. Bring together Scotland’s council leaders from all parties to decide on a strategy for working together on areas of UK […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Meet Nigel Farage: what UKIP really think about the NHS

    Meet Nigel Farage: what UKIP really think about the NHS

    The fact that UKIP is more Tory than the Tories has been often stated. Nowhere is it more clear that this statement is accurate than on health policy. The General Election will in part be a fight save the NHS. Not just from the Tories, but from UKIP as well. David Cameron’s Tories may have pushed our health service to the brink, but Nigel Farage has never even bothered to hide the fact that he is a cheerleader for increased privatisation, including through charging patients for basic care. Nigel Farage has today defended his Party Secretary who advocates privatisation of […]

    Read more →
  • News Ukip General Secretary compares the NHS to Hitler’s bunker

    Ukip General Secretary compares the NHS to Hitler’s bunker

    Ukip’s General Secretary, Matthew Richardson has called the NHS “the biggest waste of money in the UK”, the Sunday Mirror has uncovered. Richardson was speaking to right-wing activists in Washington DC, and went on to compare the NHS to Nazi Germany. He said “A number I couldn’t possibly imagine when I was younger is now the amount of money that is owed by my country… of course, at the heart of this, the Reichstag bunker of socialism, is the National […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Scotland “The best deal for Scotland is a People’s ScotRail” – Murphy announces rail plans

    “The best deal for Scotland is a People’s ScotRail” – Murphy announces rail plans

    Jim Murphy has announced his preference for a non-profit organisation, People’s Scotrail, running Scotland’s railways. The Scottish Parliament will gain extra powers – devolved through the Smith Agreement – that include allowing a non-profit organisation to bid to run Scotland’s railways. Murphy has backed this idea. This comes after the SNP awarded the contract to a firm run by the Dutch Government – despite Scottish Labour calling for a halt to the ScotRail franchising process until the Scottish Government had more powers post-Smith Commission. Jim […]

    Read more →