Employment and equalities

22nd May, 2012 11:54 am

Last week I argued that we need to put equalities issues centre stage when we think about the economy. This week I want to suggest that addressing inequalities in employment should be our focus; it’s in the workplace that both women and people from black and ethnic minority groups face the biggest disadvantages.

Work is central to our lives; to our incomes, our prospects, and our sense of who we are. But while we’ve seen progress in tackling both gender discrimination and racism over the last thirty years , when we look at the workplace we can see just how far we have to go before we can truly suggest that opportunities are equal. (And that’s not to mention the barriers to employment for disabled people, which Liam Byrne set out last week).

This was one of the major conclusions of the National Equality Panel’s comprehensive 2010 report, commissioned by Harriet Harman to look at equality issues across Britain. The report examined income, gender, ethnicity, age, sexuality and disability status. Its conclusions were stark:

Differences in pay by gender and ethnicity remain that are unrelated to qualifications and occupation. The transition from education to the labour market is failing to make the bestuse of people’s talents. . There still appears to be straightforward discrimination in recruitment, affecting both minority ethnic groups and disabled people, particularly in the private sector.” 

The ways in which gender and ethnicity translate into pay and prospects are complex. But it’s clear that it’s not just about what happens before people get to work. While inequalities remain in the education system, there’s still evidence that the best qualifications can’t protect you from discrimination. Girls now outperform boys consistently at age 16, are more likely to go on to tertiary education, and more likely to get a good degree. While in the overall population women are still less likely to have higher qualifications than men, this is reversed for every age below 44. Yet women are still paid significantly less than men: The 2011 Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings shows that median hourly pay for men working full time is £13.11, compared to £11.91 for women – a gender pay gap of 9.1%. And because women are significantly more likely to work part time than men, the overall gender pay gap is much larger, at 19.8% in 2010.

The story’s slightly different when it comes to ethnicity, where there remain significant differences in attainment at school, although when controlling for characteristics like poverty, white students are outperformed by nearly all other ethnic groups. While increasing numbers of minority ethnic students are entering higher education, they are more likely to attend less elite universities, less likely to gain a 1st or 2:1 and see smaller employment and earnings gains related to their qualifications than white students. But once again, education doesn’t trump prejudice: research by the Department for Work and Pensions found that when they sent out CVs from candidates with identical qualifications, but names suggesting different ethnicities, they needed to send around twice as many applications from candidates with a black or minority ethnic sounding name to have the same chance of success as those with ‘white’ names.

The solutions to tackling gender equality and the discrimination faced by minority ethnic groups won’t be the same. But by focusing on the workplace we might be able to see where there are common approaches that could promote equality across the board. The DWP research on employment discrimination found that where the organisation’s own application form had been used (and therefore front pages with names could be detached) there was virtually no discrimination, compared to where the application had involved sending in a CV.

That seems like a simple solution to a complex set of problems – and may prove deceptively so. We need to look not only at recruitment practices, but at the role of both education and welfare to work programmes in promoting or challenging entrenched patterns of employment, and at what happens in terms of progression and advancement when people actually get to work. That’s what I’ll be trying to do over the next few months – since the government’s showing little interest. The absence of education , employment or labour market strategies to address structural discrimination and disadvantage demonstrates Ministers’ indifference. But as with the wider economic agenda, it’s only when we look at employment opportunity through an equalities lens that we will identify the obstacles and the solutions.

Kate Green MP is the Shadow Minister for Equalities – this is the second in a  series of posts in the coming weeks.

  • David Sindall

    This hierarchy of equality is somewhat irritating. Where is the mention of disabled people who are systematically being targeted by benefit cuts, forced out of employment and more likely, if they become disabled, to loose their jobs? Additionally we need to focus on income inequality first and foremost. At a time of growing unemployment we may be seen as self indulgent if we only focus on wages in the full time economy. The increasing number of part time workers means we need to find a way of broadening the discussion so that the basis of our work around equality is focused on economic, not socio-economic factors.

    Finally, given demographic factors and the age of the post war baby boom, the party needs to find a way of drawing in the ever increasing numbers of workers who’s prospects are limited by age discrimination. Large numbers of prospective employees are written off when it comes to job hunting, we need to demonstrate that we have a plan for these older workers within our broader dialogue around equality

  • Mackem

    Where’s social class here? The report does talk about it but (a) only in terms of occupation and not the class background that would (to a hugely significant) determine that occupation and (b) treats class as just another factor among all the others rather the factor that is not only (in quantitative terms) hugely more significant than any other but also (to preponderant extent) what inequality is all about. Shockingly, Kate Green doen’t even mention it.

    • Dave Postles

      Bloody shame about One NorthEast, even if it was based on the Tyne and not the Wear.

  • Loxxie

Latest

  • Featured Miliband plans “Home Office Enforcement Unit” to tackle illegal exploitation of immigrants

    Miliband plans “Home Office Enforcement Unit” to tackle illegal exploitation of immigrants

    Ed Miliband will tomorrow lay out the five Labour principles that will underpin the party’s approach to immigration. In what the party are calling a “major speech” in the North West, Miliband will say that while he believes “immigration can benefit our country” he feels it necessary to say that “Labour got this wrong in the past”. His message will be: “We have listened. We have learned. And we have changed.” The five principles Miliband will set out are: Rebuilding […]

    Read more →
  • News Video The Promise of Britain – watch Ed Miliband’s speech announcing an end to unpaid internships

    The Promise of Britain – watch Ed Miliband’s speech announcing an end to unpaid internships

    Ed Miliband today said a Labour Government would bring about an end to unpaid internships, as he launched the party’s manifesto for young people in Lincoln. The Labour leader revisited his idea of the Promise of Britain: “Over the last five years I’ve been talking about what I call the Promise of Britain. The Promise of Britain, to me, says the next generation should do better than the last. I actually think it’s the way you judge the progress and […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Scotland The latest Ashcroft poll of Scottish seats is more than a mere earthquake – it’s a cataclysm

    The latest Ashcroft poll of Scottish seats is more than a mere earthquake – it’s a cataclysm

    If previous Ashcroft constituency polling in Scotland could be described as an earthquake, the poll the Tory peer had dropped this afternoon will require an entirely different word. A cataclysm perhaps. If this is an earthquake it’s certainly not the kind that rattles the windows in the middle of the night, it’s the sort that razes whole cities to the ground. If Lord Ashcroft’s polling is correct, there’s a risk that Scottish Labour leader Jim Murphy could lose his seat […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Shouldn’t Michael Gove be a bit disappointed with himself?

    Shouldn’t Michael Gove be a bit disappointed with himself?

    Michael Gove used to stride around Whitehall like he owned the place. Of all of the Tory Cabinet ministers who took up their posts in 2010, Gove was clearly the one who was most determined to change things. Not in a way that I’d like, admittedly. In my view his treatment of the education as a tool of ideological warfare damaged pupil and teacher alike. But there was no doubt that this was someone on a mission to change Britain. Which […]

    Read more →
  • News Miliband now bookies’ favourite become PM

    Miliband now bookies’ favourite become PM

    Ed Miliband is now the favourite to become Prime Minister, according to bookmakers. Ladbrokes now make the Labour leader odds on to be the politician walking into Downing St after May’s election. They say the odds for Miliband to be PM on July 1st are 5/6, while Cameron comes in at evens. Nigel Farage is a long shot at 100/1, while Nick Clegg is even further out at 200-1. The recalculation comes after last night’s TV debate, which Miliband was […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit