France: Second thoughts on the second round

7th May, 2012 4:36 pm

It is less than 24 hours since François Hollande won the presidential election and I can see the clouds gathering already.

After a safe campaign, the Right in government for ten years, and a victory in the debate against the least popular president in history, we are left with just 51.8% to show for it.

Those who said the campaign could not be lost have been proven wrong. It would be a foolish act of both naivety and wishful thinking to suggest that massive Labour gains in local elections and a Socialist victory in France signal a revival of the Left in Europe. (I don’t even need to open the Guardian to know it is saying exactly that!)

That all sounds very pessimistic, but just as it was important to remember that ‘no sitting president ever lost the first round’, we must also remember that the Parti Socialiste has never won two consecutive national elections. Mitterrand was re-elected in 1988, but that was in between the cohabitations of 1986-1988 and 1993-1995.

This brings me to the legislative elections in a month’s time. It is possible, perhaps even likely, that Hollande’s victory will sufficiently mobilise left-wing voters to deliver a confident parliamentary majority. That is usually the pattern, even the tradition, of the 5th Republic, but it is difficult to see what is usual or unusual about the political climate at this time.

On the formation of the government, I said before the first round that I believe Hollande will choose the either Socialist Parliamentary Group Leader, Jean-Marc Ayrault or Martine Aubry as Prime Minister, with Moscovici becoming Secretary General of the Elysée.

Polls have already circulated over whether Hollande should invite the Greens, the Front de Gauche (the Reds) or the centrists into the government. Deals have been done in the legislatives to hand safe seats to the Greens, and given the fact that Eva Joly won around 2% in Round 1 it might have seemed unnecessary.

A PS-Green deal should work well for both parties. Hollande will need a strong Green Group in the Assemblée so that the PS does not seem too dominant. For the first time ever, the PS will control the Presidency, the Sénat, possibly the Assemblée, 21 or 22 regions, most départements and plenty of mayors. Hollande will be glad to have the Greens as human shields and the Greens will be happy to be able to weigh in on the national debate more seriously. Contrast this with the fact that, if Hollande were to work with the Front de Gauche, Jean-Luc Melenchon would constantly be outbidding Hollande for more spending and tax rises in a way that the Greens could not.

With a score of 51.8%, and a turnout of 80%, I cannot see where any new left-wing votes will come from. It is worth remembering that 7% voted blank yesterday. Whether that was a vote for ‘none of the above’ or an indication of Marine Le Pen’s power over the far right remains to be seen, but there are two million blank voters out there who are lurking quietly in the wings.

Now that Sarkozy has supposedly quit politics (to work on his son’s career), there is a power vacuum in the UMP. Jean François Copé is set to lead and has been positioning himself accordingly for months. Meanwhile, François Fillion remains popular within the party. Recently, I noted that Copé has proposed to reinstate official courants (i.e. factions), meaning that the UMP is beginning to look remarkably similar to the grotesque chaos of the Parti Socialiste after Jospin in 2002.

Sarkozy’s greatest failure, more long lasting than all the other failures, is the revival of the Front National. This is good for the Left and simultaneously bad for the Republic.

It is good for the Left because Marine Le Pen has given instructions that, should FN candidates qualify for the second round in a parliamentary constituency, they are to stay in the race against the PS and the UMP candidate. The FN will thus split the right wing vote and let the PS slip in. Hollande’s majority will come from tricking the system rather than new voters, hence why the PS-Green alliance will be successful.

It is bad for the Republic because it has made the UMP move to the Right and therefore the border between the UMP and the FN more porous. For a short term and unstable political gain, Sarkozy has alienated or killed off the last of the Gaullist Republicans. That is why former President Chirac and former Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin returned for their final revenge against Sarkozy. If the UMP does suffer heavy losses in the legislatives, the hard-right heirs to Sarkozy will do what would have been unthinkable for Chirac and form an alliance with the FN. It will be secretive at first, then informal, and then could permanently restructure the right. That is to be lamented.

In conclusion, though there are still mountains to climb and clouds on the horizon there are still reasons to be cheerful. The Republic has won its second Socialist President, and that can only be good for democracy.

You can read more from Hadleigh Roberts here.

  • mcquade

    “left with just 51.8% to show for it.”

    More than Mitterand managed and certainly better than any other candidate has ever managed against an incumbent.

    “It is worth remembering that 7% voted blank yesterday.”

    5.8% actually.

  • PaulHalsall

    I really have no idea why you are so depressed.

  • derek

    Ain’t it just unbelievable when million of Britons have more respect for Hollande than Cameron.

  • John Dore

    This is huge for the UK, it will be the marker  austerity v spending. Personally I give him a year, nobody is going to lend him any money and rates will go stratsospheric.

    • hp

      I really do not like the term ‘austerity’.
      Where did that come from?
      What they mean is ‘reality’, or maybe ‘normality’.
      The idea that stopping unsustainable spending is ‘austerity’ is simply ridiculous.

      • James3010

         Agreed. The biggest problem i have with most of the discourse on public spending in this country from all three parties but the worst offender is Labour is that they do not seem to understand nothing is free. The NHS is not free, pensions are not free, welfare is not free the list goes on, it all has to be paid for and what any Govt cannot get via taxation it borrows and borrowing like all debt has to be serviced and that in turn costs yet more money. There are three basic solutions to this fact of life, spend less, so called austerity, tax more with the known risk that the actual tax contributors go elsewhere it has after all happened before or and here’s the radical idea honest politics, tell the electorate that whilst “fill in the blank” may be desirable it is not affordable and have cross party agreement on it or to use an old fashioned term nation before party but that will never happen in the tribal politics of the UK because all tories are heartless rich scum all LibDems traitors to the cause and all Labourites  are in the pockets of the union barons.

  • John Dore

    1 British pound = 1.24042292 Euros
    Couple this with Greece and I think the phrase is…. I think we have a hot one here……

    We are at a huge tipping point, this is not one of the PIGS, but a big economy. We’ll see if he supports the German line or is prepared to take the Euro to the abyss. If he gets it wrong, rates go stupid, yields dry up and France will go bust, thats whats on the table.

    Trust me the people have voted for the guy who says you can have it all. I cant see how he’ll do it, but as they say bonne chance.

    • JoeDM

       Germany today has ruled out reworking the European Union’s “fiskalpakt” .  

      Now where will Holland get the dosh to pay for his socialist wet dream?

      Remember the failure of the Mitterand socialist plans in the 80s.   Looks like France is heading up the creek without a paddle again.

      • Brumanuensis

        Merkel will re-work the pact, albeit not with any fanfare. She’s not stupid after all. 

        • hp

          Merkel does not need to change anything.
          The price of credit for france will keep thjings level.

        • hp

          Merkel does not need to change anything.
          The price of credit for france will keep thjings level.

          • Brumanuensis

            Because ‘staying on track’ has really done wonders for the credit ratings of Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain oviously. 

            And gosh, the US downgrade last August led to a surge in their bond yields? Wowee, up they went like a rocket! And France was never downgraded under Sarkozy, of course. And Hollande is a dangerous loony who totally hasn’t pledged to balance the national budget by 2017. And expansionary fiscal contraction TOTES isn’t a loony economic theory based on crappy analysis and wishful thinking.

            Sure, credit markets. Whatever. Invisible Bond Vigilantes should show up any time now.      

        • John Dore

          Merkel will re-work the pact, LOL

          • Brumanuensis

            I agree, it will be funny to see her having to change her approach. Unless she’s happy with the Euro breaking up.

  • Daniel Speight

    It’s good to see a LL contributor being so enthusiastic over a socialist victory in a neigbouring country.

Latest

  • Comment Victory is what we owe to the people we represent

    Victory is what we owe to the people we represent

    In 1963 JFK prepared (but never got to deliver) a speech attacking ‘voices preaching doctrines which apparently assume that … vituperation is as good as victory.’ Reading that last phrase recently I knew immediately what he meant. Years ago, after the 1980 local elections in the wake of Thatcher’s victory, there was a view in some quarters that, even when we won control locally, we should remain in opposition to ‘teach the electorate a lesson’. The idea was that if […]

    Read more →
  • Comment How well does Labour know its own members?

    How well does Labour know its own members?

    Reading an article on ConservativeHome provided a clear demonstration of how the Conservatives have embraced technology and have left Labour behind.  Without a clear signal of intent and without significant investment in tech, the Party will be hobbled at future elections. Fundamentally, the Party does not appear to have the level of information and detail required about its own members, let alone its voters and potential voters.  Without this it cannot motivate anyone.  The ability to tailor a pitch, an […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Corbyn promises to welcome “great talents” from all parts of the Labour party into his shadow cabinet

    Corbyn promises to welcome “great talents” from all parts of the Labour party into his shadow cabinet

    Jeremy Corbyn has said he would welcome “great talents” from all parts of the Labour party – including the Blairite wing – into his shadow cabinet if he becomes leader. In an interview with the Observer, the MP for Islington North says that he wants to have a “big tent”, including so-called Blairites and Brownites in his team. “Of course there are differences of opinion and I have to be big enough to accommodate those differences of opinion and I […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Neil Kinnock endorses Andy Burnham for Labour leader

    Neil Kinnock endorses Andy Burnham for Labour leader

    Neil Kinnock has endorsed Andy Burnham to be Labour’s next leader. The former Labour leader has written an article in the Guardian in which he argues that Burnham has “the radical values” “the experience as a campaigner and a cabinet minister” and “the credible policies” to be Labour leader. In a veiled jibe directed at Jeremy Corbyn, Kinnock also tells Labour members and supporters that the party “are not choosing the chair of a discussion group who can preside over […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Is Blue Labour the answer to Labour’s woes?

    Is Blue Labour the answer to Labour’s woes?

    What can the much-derided Blue Labour offer the party? It is a question worth asking, because the leadership contest has so far largely eschewed big ideas. Surely, losing so badly in England and being flat-out destroyed in Scotland calls for a thorough reckoning with the party’s downward trajectory from 2005 to the present – a soul-searching process which asks: what is Labour now for? Jeremy Corbyn is excelling and inspiring partly because he is the only candidate with a clear […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit