France: Second thoughts on the second round

May 7, 2012 4:36 pm

It is less than 24 hours since François Hollande won the presidential election and I can see the clouds gathering already.

After a safe campaign, the Right in government for ten years, and a victory in the debate against the least popular president in history, we are left with just 51.8% to show for it.

Those who said the campaign could not be lost have been proven wrong. It would be a foolish act of both naivety and wishful thinking to suggest that massive Labour gains in local elections and a Socialist victory in France signal a revival of the Left in Europe. (I don’t even need to open the Guardian to know it is saying exactly that!)

That all sounds very pessimistic, but just as it was important to remember that ‘no sitting president ever lost the first round’, we must also remember that the Parti Socialiste has never won two consecutive national elections. Mitterrand was re-elected in 1988, but that was in between the cohabitations of 1986-1988 and 1993-1995.

This brings me to the legislative elections in a month’s time. It is possible, perhaps even likely, that Hollande’s victory will sufficiently mobilise left-wing voters to deliver a confident parliamentary majority. That is usually the pattern, even the tradition, of the 5th Republic, but it is difficult to see what is usual or unusual about the political climate at this time.

On the formation of the government, I said before the first round that I believe Hollande will choose the either Socialist Parliamentary Group Leader, Jean-Marc Ayrault or Martine Aubry as Prime Minister, with Moscovici becoming Secretary General of the Elysée.

Polls have already circulated over whether Hollande should invite the Greens, the Front de Gauche (the Reds) or the centrists into the government. Deals have been done in the legislatives to hand safe seats to the Greens, and given the fact that Eva Joly won around 2% in Round 1 it might have seemed unnecessary.

A PS-Green deal should work well for both parties. Hollande will need a strong Green Group in the Assemblée so that the PS does not seem too dominant. For the first time ever, the PS will control the Presidency, the Sénat, possibly the Assemblée, 21 or 22 regions, most départements and plenty of mayors. Hollande will be glad to have the Greens as human shields and the Greens will be happy to be able to weigh in on the national debate more seriously. Contrast this with the fact that, if Hollande were to work with the Front de Gauche, Jean-Luc Melenchon would constantly be outbidding Hollande for more spending and tax rises in a way that the Greens could not.

With a score of 51.8%, and a turnout of 80%, I cannot see where any new left-wing votes will come from. It is worth remembering that 7% voted blank yesterday. Whether that was a vote for ‘none of the above’ or an indication of Marine Le Pen’s power over the far right remains to be seen, but there are two million blank voters out there who are lurking quietly in the wings.

Now that Sarkozy has supposedly quit politics (to work on his son’s career), there is a power vacuum in the UMP. Jean François Copé is set to lead and has been positioning himself accordingly for months. Meanwhile, François Fillion remains popular within the party. Recently, I noted that Copé has proposed to reinstate official courants (i.e. factions), meaning that the UMP is beginning to look remarkably similar to the grotesque chaos of the Parti Socialiste after Jospin in 2002.

Sarkozy’s greatest failure, more long lasting than all the other failures, is the revival of the Front National. This is good for the Left and simultaneously bad for the Republic.

It is good for the Left because Marine Le Pen has given instructions that, should FN candidates qualify for the second round in a parliamentary constituency, they are to stay in the race against the PS and the UMP candidate. The FN will thus split the right wing vote and let the PS slip in. Hollande’s majority will come from tricking the system rather than new voters, hence why the PS-Green alliance will be successful.

It is bad for the Republic because it has made the UMP move to the Right and therefore the border between the UMP and the FN more porous. For a short term and unstable political gain, Sarkozy has alienated or killed off the last of the Gaullist Republicans. That is why former President Chirac and former Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin returned for their final revenge against Sarkozy. If the UMP does suffer heavy losses in the legislatives, the hard-right heirs to Sarkozy will do what would have been unthinkable for Chirac and form an alliance with the FN. It will be secretive at first, then informal, and then could permanently restructure the right. That is to be lamented.

In conclusion, though there are still mountains to climb and clouds on the horizon there are still reasons to be cheerful. The Republic has won its second Socialist President, and that can only be good for democracy.

You can read more from Hadleigh Roberts here.

  • mcquade

    “left with just 51.8% to show for it.”

    More than Mitterand managed and certainly better than any other candidate has ever managed against an incumbent.

    “It is worth remembering that 7% voted blank yesterday.”

    5.8% actually.

  • PaulHalsall

    I really have no idea why you are so depressed.

  • derek

    Ain’t it just unbelievable when million of Britons have more respect for Hollande than Cameron.

  • John Dore

    This is huge for the UK, it will be the marker  austerity v spending. Personally I give him a year, nobody is going to lend him any money and rates will go stratsospheric.

    • hp

      I really do not like the term ‘austerity’.
      Where did that come from?
      What they mean is ‘reality’, or maybe ‘normality’.
      The idea that stopping unsustainable spending is ‘austerity’ is simply ridiculous.

      • James3010

         Agreed. The biggest problem i have with most of the discourse on public spending in this country from all three parties but the worst offender is Labour is that they do not seem to understand nothing is free. The NHS is not free, pensions are not free, welfare is not free the list goes on, it all has to be paid for and what any Govt cannot get via taxation it borrows and borrowing like all debt has to be serviced and that in turn costs yet more money. There are three basic solutions to this fact of life, spend less, so called austerity, tax more with the known risk that the actual tax contributors go elsewhere it has after all happened before or and here’s the radical idea honest politics, tell the electorate that whilst “fill in the blank” may be desirable it is not affordable and have cross party agreement on it or to use an old fashioned term nation before party but that will never happen in the tribal politics of the UK because all tories are heartless rich scum all LibDems traitors to the cause and all Labourites  are in the pockets of the union barons.

  • John Dore

    1 British pound = 1.24042292 Euros
    Couple this with Greece and I think the phrase is…. I think we have a hot one here……

    We are at a huge tipping point, this is not one of the PIGS, but a big economy. We’ll see if he supports the German line or is prepared to take the Euro to the abyss. If he gets it wrong, rates go stupid, yields dry up and France will go bust, thats whats on the table.

    Trust me the people have voted for the guy who says you can have it all. I cant see how he’ll do it, but as they say bonne chance.

    • JoeDM

       Germany today has ruled out reworking the European Union’s “fiskalpakt” .  

      Now where will Holland get the dosh to pay for his socialist wet dream?

      Remember the failure of the Mitterand socialist plans in the 80s.   Looks like France is heading up the creek without a paddle again.

      • Brumanuensis

        Merkel will re-work the pact, albeit not with any fanfare. She’s not stupid after all. 

        • hp

          Merkel does not need to change anything.
          The price of credit for france will keep thjings level.

        • hp

          Merkel does not need to change anything.
          The price of credit for france will keep thjings level.

          • Brumanuensis

            Because ‘staying on track’ has really done wonders for the credit ratings of Greece, Ireland, Portugal and Spain oviously. 

            And gosh, the US downgrade last August led to a surge in their bond yields? Wowee, up they went like a rocket! And France was never downgraded under Sarkozy, of course. And Hollande is a dangerous loony who totally hasn’t pledged to balance the national budget by 2017. And expansionary fiscal contraction TOTES isn’t a loony economic theory based on crappy analysis and wishful thinking.

            Sure, credit markets. Whatever. Invisible Bond Vigilantes should show up any time now.      

        • John Dore

          Merkel will re-work the pact, LOL

          • Brumanuensis

            I agree, it will be funny to see her having to change her approach. Unless she’s happy with the Euro breaking up.

  • Daniel Speight

    It’s good to see a LL contributor being so enthusiastic over a socialist victory in a neigbouring country.

Latest

  • Comment Reaching new communities

    Reaching new communities

    This article is from Our Labour, Our Communities – a pamphlet of 10 essays by Labour PPCs, published by LabourList in partnership with Lisa Nandy MP. I am proud to be standing as the candidate for my hometown of Hastings & Rye, but I am equally proud to stand as a parliamentary candidate who is also half Chinese and half British. My mother is Chinese Malaysian and came to this country 41 years ago to be a nurse in Hastings and continues to […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Cutting Trident will be the price of support in a hung parliament. That’s the news reported from a meeting of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green leaders this week. With Labour’s slim lead and the SNP and Green vote threatening to impact on its share, this is a serious issue. Labour’s policy clearly states, ‘Labour has said that we are committed to a minimum, credible independent nuclear deterrent, delivered through a Continuous At-Sea Deterrent. It would require a clear body […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Lord Ashcroft has told him he shouldn’t have done it in 2010. Lynton Crosby has told him not to do it in 2015. It’s no surprise that David Cameron is trying to wriggle out of televised leader debates during the General Election – even though he has said he is willing to take part “in principle”. Time perhaps to dust off one of Margaret Thatcher’s favourite barbs “He’s frit.” Neil Kinnock tried it in 1992 to try to goad John Major into […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    By Stephen Timms MP and Ian Murray MP The Christmas period reminds us that modern life can be busy, hurried and demanding. The pressures of work, demands of family life and hectic Christmas schedules can prove stretching as we juggle competing demands. Increasingly the need for flexible work is driven by the complex shape of people’s lives; as parents go to work, struggle to make ends meet, perform career roles, take their children to school and activities and try and carve […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    As the start of the long campaign begins today, curbing the amount of money parties can spend between now and May 7th, Labour MP Jon Ashworth has sought to clarify what precautions are being taken to ensure publicly-funded government advisers are not using their time campaigning. Ashworth has sent a letter to senior civil servant Jeremy Heywood, asking him to answer a number of questions about what kind of campaigning activity was permitted and undertaken by special advisers (SpAds) in […]

    Read more →