Ken vs Boris

2nd May, 2012 5:45 pm

After months of campaigning, it’s time for Londoners to make up their minds about which Mayor will run our city in the next four crucial years.

This is the time to look back on the records of both men: what each inherited, and their legacies.

For Labour you have an effective and uniquely experienced “executive” Mayor, with an encyclopaedic knowledge of London – Ken Livingstone

For the Tories a convivial part-time “ceremonial” Mayor, good at opening things, one-liners and endless waffle – Boris Johnson.

Compare their records.

When Ken was elected in 2000 London was a world city at risk after fourteen years with no citywide government.

The transport system was creaking at the seams: internationally, London was renowned for being easy to get to but difficult to get around, with congested streets and ramshackle public transport. There was an acute housing crisis, growing inequalities and a huge backlog of investment in social infrastructure and the environment.

As London’s first elected Mayor, Ken set up the GLA from scratch, defining its modus operandi and establishing its vision and goals. As his Deputy Mayor I was part of that process, and honestly cannot imagine anyone who could have got the authority up and running more efficiently or more quickly than Ken. While being happy to debate and discuss issues with staff, stakeholders and the public, Ken had a complete grasp of the options and admirable decisiveness.

He was acutely aware that the new authority had to tackle lots of things at once.

He began a revolution in how we police our city. He increased the number of police on the streets, bringing them out of their cars and into our communities, introducing the Safer Neighbourhoods community policing teams in every ward in London.

He tackled the then woefully inadequate transport system. In the short term, he massively improved the bus system, adding a third to the fleet and draconian enforcement of bus lanes. At the same time he began a rail renaissance – Tube modernisation; creating the Overground network, including the East London Line extension; and getting Crossrail agreed and funded after decades of procrastination by central governments. Ken also prepared a programme of future transport projects post 2018 and, of course, introduced the Oyster Card, congestion charge and the London Low Emission Zone. These and other policies resulted in the fastest shift out of the private car and onto bikes, buses, and feet in any major city in the world.

He inherited a housing crisis and a rapidly rising population. He doubled the number of homes built in London each year from 17,000 to 32,000 and worked towards 50% affordable homes in every housing development. He secured from the Labour government the largest housing investment budget ever in London – £5bn over to provide 50,000 homes in 3 years.

He tackled London’s huge carbon footprint with a raft of measures including the first comprehensive Climate Change Action Plan and set up the C40 group of large cities worldwide to collaborate to address climate change at the metropolitan scale.

He took on the challenge of regenerating the Thames Gateway, the largest concentration of multiply deprived communities in Western Europe. It was Ken who spearheaded the campaign to secure the Olympic and Paralympic Games for London to give momentum to the regeneration of East London and the Thames Gateway.

In short, Ken gave us a powerful vision for the future – “to develop London as an exemplary sustainable world city” – and provided the means to deliver it.

He also introduced a raft of policies to make London a fairer and more equal city. He created the women’s unit at city hall, provided assistance with child care, gave under 18s free travel and funded a host of events celebrating the many cultures across London.

Boris Johnson inherited that catalogue of solid achievements when he entered City Hall in 2008 and has spent the past four years enjoying the fruits of Ken’s labour. From Crossrail to the Olympics, Johnson has merely cut the ribbons on Ken’s projects.

Johnson has done very little, but he’s undone a great deal.

His first act was to cancel nearly all of Ken’s long-term transport projects, starting with the Thames Gateway Bridge.

He weakened the London Plan, especially in respect of housing, abandoning Ken’s ambitious target that 50 percent of all new homes should be affordable.

He squandered the record £5 billion housing budget, failing to deliver the 50,000 affordable homes by 2011.

He got rid of the accessible bendy buses and replaced them with eight “Boris Buses” at about £1.25 m each… probably the most expensive bus in the world!

Despite his claims to the contrary, he managed to reduce by almost 2,000 the number of police officers in advance of the Olympics and Paralympics.

And when his leadership was tested last summer, during the August Riots, he utterly failed even the basic test of being in London. What a contrast to Ken’s response to 7/7.

Perhaps most serious of all, while Ken is campaigning against the Tory government’s welfare reforms, Boris Johnson “absolutely” supports them. By 2016 only 20% of inner-London and less than half of outer-London neighbourhoods will be affordable to people receiving housing benefit – most of who are either in work or pensioners.

As we are starting to see, this will change the social fabric of London. It will create social segregation on an unprecedented scale and undo the mixed communities that have driven London’s social and economic success.

As a Tory Mayor, Boris has been obsessed with the Tory agenda. This is the man who in September 2010 said:

“You know we in the government in London have been making very substantial cuts for the last two years. I don’t think there’s any part of government across Whitehall that’s moved so far and so fast to make cuts.”

The fact is that even before the recession Boris’s main activity as a part-time Mayor has been cutting investment in London.

That is why there is virtually nothing for him to call his own and nothing in the locker for the next term. As a cabbie put it to me, we got a bunch of bikes for city blokes, when we could have had a bridge over the Thames for East Enders.

In contrast, Ken’s record shows he will fight to make London a fairer and more equal city. He will deliver more homes that Londoners can afford, safer streets, more jobs and training and better transport with cheaper tube and bus fares.

He has new ideas about delivering more affordable homes in partnership with the pension funds and a serious commitment to cutting London’s carbon emissions.

Ken has the record the show that he’ll deliver for all Londoners and that he speaks for all Londoners in a crisis.

In the end, the sensible choice is Ken.

The only arguments against him have been a relentless stream of negative campaigning. That worked in 2008. Don’t let Boris get away with it again.

Nicky Gavron is a London assembly member

  • treborc1

    We shall know soon enough

  • Bill Lockhart

    Mr. Gavron’s response to a “relentless stream of negative campaigning” is…an article composed of relentless negative campaigning. Some mistake surely?

    How would Livingstone deliver “better transport with cheaper fares” when TfL themselves categorically affirm that fare cuts can not be implemented without robbing the investment fund? Cheaper fares, more overcrowding and cancelled upgrades. No thanks.

    • JoeDM

       Maybe  Ken will provide TfL with the number of his tax accountant.

  • Guest

    thank goodness that Boris got rid of the bendy buses. they were a nightmare for this disabled elderly person, and for many of us with limited mobility. if they got to a bus-stop first and the bus you needed stopped behind, there was never time to walk to the far end of the bendy bus. just call it the buses I have missed…it made travelling very tiring and difficult for this person with ME/CFS. And Boris has promised to make the Freedom Pass available for all over-60’s – when Ken speaks of 7% fare cuts he appears to have forgotten the elderly altogether. Ken did some good stuff for London, but as far as I am concerned, a man who is so petty and spiteful and insensitive as to compare a Jewish reporter to a Nazi concentration camp guard, and then isn’t big enough to apologise, is not big enough to be mayor of this great city. And I voted for him the first time!

    • JoeDM

      They also had the rather nasty habit of killing cyclists.

      • Bill Lockhart

        And pedestrians, one of whom Livingstone then tried to blame for being “drunk” when the bloke was nothing of the sort. And of course they were the fare-dodgers’ greatest gift ever- probably worth a few votes for Livingstone from the idiot Left’s favourite London minority, the “looting community”.

        • Guest

          Again untrue. The evidence suggests that the bendy bus was no more dangerous than a conventional double decker. The problem occurs when people compare the safety record of a bus used solely on busy A roads with a whole network of buses that operate well out into the suburbs.

          • GuyM

            The bendy bus was a horrible contraption, a fare dodgers paradise and a nightmare to have pass you if on a bike.

            Good riddance to them.

          • James

            That’s where you ought to be, Guy… ON YOUR BIKE!

          • GuyM

            No need, I have a job, unlike so many of Labour’s core vote.

      • Guest

        Completely untrue. This was disproved during the 2008 election and again – and again, and again – since.

Latest

  • Comment Would calling for a ban on private school be electoral suicide?

    Would calling for a ban on private school be electoral suicide?

    If I’d had a vote in the last election I wouldn’t have voted Labour. I thought its flagship policies were too boring. Any government will invest money, regulate business and adjust taxes to nudge Britain in the direction it wants. Freezing energy bills may have been a good course of action, but what will win my vote are the policies that make a lasting impact. For me, Labour’s choice of leader is insignificant if the party’s biggest promises aren’t reformist […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs its centre-left more than ever

    Labour needs its centre-left more than ever

    I’ve decided who I am voting for, but for a lot of this campaign I’ve wanted to abstain, or go on holiday. It has been a pretty difficult time to be on the centre-left of the Labour Party . The quality has been low, and nobody fully reflects people on what we might call ‘the soft left’. Lots of people I respect, generally from the left of the party in some shape or form, have been hugely inspired during the Corbyn […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Sajid Javid could be the sign the electorate is looking for that the Tory party has shed its ‘nasty party’ reputation

    Sajid Javid could be the sign the electorate is looking for that the Tory party has shed its ‘nasty party’ reputation

    This article is from the new Progress pamphlet ‘Face-off’, examining the potential successors to David Cameron as Conservative leader. You can read the full pamphlet here. Few leaders inspire true fear in their opponents. Those that do, do so because they force people to think again about the party they represent. Britain’s most electorally successful politicians, Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher, were able to reach such heights because they confounded the electorate’s expectations: Blair believed that wealth creation was not […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Tony Blair hits out at Corbyn’s “politics of parallel reality”

    Tony Blair hits out at Corbyn’s “politics of parallel reality”

    Tony Blair has made a new intervention in the Labour leadership contest with an article in today’s Observer, which the paper has splashed with on the front page: The former Labour Prime Minister confesses that he doesn’t “get” frontrunner Jeremy Corbyn’s popularity, but claims that he is “trying hard” to understand it, and compares it to similar waves of support for Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders in the US presidential race. Blair also says he appreciates that his advice against […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Unions Anti-trade union legislation could face legal challenge for contravening human rights

    Anti-trade union legislation could face legal challenge for contravening human rights

    Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is ready to raise the prospect of challenging the Tories’ proposed anti-trade union laws in the courts, claiming it might contravene human rights legislation. Cooper says she has received legal advice that points to potential breaches of Article 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights, which preserves the right of freedom of association, including trade unions. The leadership contender will accuse the Conservatives of trying to use their position to cripple the opposition with […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit