McNicol’s revolution – 100 new candidates and 200 new organisers

May 17, 2012 3:08 pm

The Labour Party plans to select as many as 100 parliamentary candidates in the next 12 months, and have 200 party organisers working “in our communities” by 2014, it was revealed today.

Party staff were told of the plans by General Secretary Iain McNicol yesterday (and confirmed in an interview with the Guardian published this afternoon).  Although perhaps somewhat unusually in the recent history of the party, these plans did not leak before they were announced. Equally as unusually, McNicol has been keen to do press interviews and be a public face for the debate around party reform – something General Secretaries have often shied away from in the past.

The party’s plans for the early selection of PPCs and the hiring of more organisers is linked to Miliband’s aim – as outlined at the weekend – to conduct a huge voter registration drive. The party also knows from past experience that turnout tends to be higher and the results for Labour tend to be better where candidates and organisers are in place. In many ways this move signals a bridging of the gap between what was successful in 2010 (organisers working in key seats) and the strategy that will be needed next time (higher turnout and more engaged members and supporters – therefore far more volunteers). Or as McNicol puts it:

“They are going to vote if you have done something to help them in their street or community…We need to be operating in communities in a new way and stop seeing parties as vote-harvesting machines.”

There also clearly going to be a significant shift of emphasis away from “switchers” and towards those who don’t vote – a big task for a party that is only really coming to terms with the current way of campaigning. But McNicol and his team have clearly taken on board criticism of the Bradford West campaign, as he says:

“My biggest regret is that we took down the playbook from the shelf on how to win byelections that had worked very well in Feltham and Heston”

That’s right – as I argued only a few hours after the Bradford West defeat:

“What we saw in Bradford was an extreme example of how Labour’s approach to politics is failing. We focused on an anti-Tory message that ignored the real electoral threat, it didn’t engage voters, and it failed. It was Scotland MkII. It was comfort zone politics from a comfort zone opposition.”

The party needs a more sophisticated form of campaigning to deal with the modern world, modern communities and the way the electorate is trending – towards disinterest and disillusion.

Yesterday’s email to staff also confirmed that Miliband and his staff (as well as the shadow cabinet) have started to work more regularly in Labour’s new Brewer’s Green HQ. That was the aim mooted back in March when Labour’s new Executive Directors were announced, and now that the party have vacated Victoria Street, and decamped into their (almost finished) new offices, that’s something that is expected to become the norm.

  • Chilbaldi

    Hurry young Westminster staffers! Not much time to brush up your selection CVs!

    • http://twitter.com/gonzozzz dave stone

      No doubt Ed will shortly find himself surrounded by a lot of self-declared new best friends.

      • treborc1

         he will be use to it, he should be he was one himself.

  • Alexwilliamz

    Won;t they need to wait to see what happens with the change to boundaries first? Other wise we might see candidates selected for seats that evaporate?

    • Chilbaldi

      I think they are selecting on the basis that the boundary changes will be effected.

  • 1earthmother2

    The constituency I live in,Norwich North is due to select soon for an all woman shortlist.I see no reason why the candidate selection can’t be widened out in the way Iain McNicol suggests,involving as many in the community who are generally supportive and who wish to be involved,not just for party members.I’m pretty sure Hollande’s success in France was helped by a similar process.Others locally may not share this view of course but what’s to lose?
    We need as many people as possible to agree an opponent to Chloe Smith(Osborne’s own personal human shield) in Ian Gibson’s old seat which has to be winnable.

  • andykinsey

    community organising… :) 
    movement for change anyone? :)

  • andykinsey

    community organising… :) 
    movement for change anyone? :)

  • Declan Walsh

    My concern is that it will be centrally selected party apparatchiks parachuted in and the local people will have little choice in whom they would select.

  • AlanGiles

    Let us just hope quality rather than quantity is the watchword, otherwise we will have  Mandy’s friends and fresh-from-University Georgia Gould’s handed safe seats.

    It would be nice to think Birkenhead would be getting a Labour MP again – any sign of you-know-who retiring?

    * Ulf Linde (1928 –     )

    • treborc1

      Unless labour push  him to walking across the floor,  well he is nearly their anyway

       

  • UKAzeri

    I like the emphasis on Labour’s core vote rather than swingers! Refreshing admission of a failed aproach !

  • Pingback: It’s time for the party to fête our activists like we do our financial donors | Prem

Latest

  • News George Osborne doesn’t accept living standards are falling

    George Osborne doesn’t accept living standards are falling

    Here’s one for the “what was he thinking?” files. George Osborne was interviewed by ITV news about today’s growth figures, yet when Economics Editor Richard Edgar noted that living standards are falling as wages have fallen behind inflation, the Chancellor disagreed with that fact, saying “I don’t accept that.” Here’s Elgar’s tweet: Living standards have fallen since 2010. So why won’t the Chancellor accept that? Is it because it punches a hole in his narrative about the British economy…?

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe Farage has chosen to cosy up with the sort of political party that makes most of us feel sick

    Farage has chosen to cosy up with the sort of political party that makes most of us feel sick

    Why do so many of us go canvassing and door-knocking in the rain? Or give up evenings and weekends for the Labour Party when we could be anywhere else. There’s always a candidate to support or a campaign to be won. But ultimately it’s about more than that – it’s about fighting for our values. We all get into politics to argue for what we think is right and to change our world bit by bit, day by day for […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland What should Scottish Labour do?

    What should Scottish Labour do?

    There is much talk in the Scottish media about a crisis in Scottish Labour. Some of it is of course froth (is the Scottish Daily Mail where we would seek advice in our best interest?). But some of it is substantial – based on the post-poll evidence, anything between 30-40% of Labour voters voted Yes in the referendum. The angst is also heightened by the surge in SNP membership to nearly 80,000, making them the third largest political party in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment For our immigration policy, Labour should forget the Tories and look to Europe

    For our immigration policy, Labour should forget the Tories and look to Europe

    Three quarters want fewer foreigners. Disillusioned voters have flocked to the radical right. The Government and Commission are at war over the free movement of labour. An EU exit is a real possibility. In case you haven’t noticed, immigration is back on the agenda. And that means Labour, to stand a chance of winning in May, must present credible immigration policies to voters over the next seven months – not an easy task considering research has shown immigration may have […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe McFadden (rightly) slams EU’s “unacceptable” cash grab. We need to tell Brussels to get lost

    McFadden (rightly) slams EU’s “unacceptable” cash grab. We need to tell Brussels to get lost

    As someone who is broadly pro-European, there comes a point every so often where the European Union do something so completely indefensible that makes you wonder if they want the UK to leave after all. Today is one of those times, with the UK being presented with a backdated bill for £1.7 billion, based on growth calculations that have been inaccurate for 20 years. Seemingly these changes are due to “European Union-wide changes to national accounts designed to better measure […]

    Read more →