McNicol’s revolution – 100 new candidates and 200 new organisers

May 17, 2012 3:08 pm

The Labour Party plans to select as many as 100 parliamentary candidates in the next 12 months, and have 200 party organisers working “in our communities” by 2014, it was revealed today.

Party staff were told of the plans by General Secretary Iain McNicol yesterday (and confirmed in an interview with the Guardian published this afternoon).  Although perhaps somewhat unusually in the recent history of the party, these plans did not leak before they were announced. Equally as unusually, McNicol has been keen to do press interviews and be a public face for the debate around party reform – something General Secretaries have often shied away from in the past.

The party’s plans for the early selection of PPCs and the hiring of more organisers is linked to Miliband’s aim – as outlined at the weekend – to conduct a huge voter registration drive. The party also knows from past experience that turnout tends to be higher and the results for Labour tend to be better where candidates and organisers are in place. In many ways this move signals a bridging of the gap between what was successful in 2010 (organisers working in key seats) and the strategy that will be needed next time (higher turnout and more engaged members and supporters - therefore far more volunteers). Or as McNicol puts it:

“They are going to vote if you have done something to help them in their street or community…We need to be operating in communities in a new way and stop seeing parties as vote-harvesting machines.”

There also clearly going to be a significant shift of emphasis away from “switchers” and towards those who don’t vote – a big task for a party that is only really coming to terms with the current way of campaigning. But McNicol and his team have clearly taken on board criticism of the Bradford West campaign, as he says:

“My biggest regret is that we took down the playbook from the shelf on how to win byelections that had worked very well in Feltham and Heston”

That’s right – as I argued only a few hours after the Bradford West defeat:

“What we saw in Bradford was an extreme example of how Labour’s approach to politics is failing. We focused on an anti-Tory message that ignored the real electoral threat, it didn’t engage voters, and it failed. It was Scotland MkII. It was comfort zone politics from a comfort zone opposition.”

The party needs a more sophisticated form of campaigning to deal with the modern world, modern communities and the way the electorate is trending – towards disinterest and disillusion.

Yesterday’s email to staff also confirmed that Miliband and his staff (as well as the shadow cabinet) have started to work more regularly in Labour’s new Brewer’s Green HQ. That was the aim mooted back in March when Labour’s new Executive Directors were announced, and now that the party have vacated Victoria Street, and decamped into their (almost finished) new offices, that’s something that is expected to become the norm.

  • Chilbaldi

    Hurry young Westminster staffers! Not much time to brush up your selection CVs!

    • http://twitter.com/gonzozzz dave stone

      No doubt Ed will shortly find himself surrounded by a lot of self-declared new best friends.

      • treborc1

         he will be use to it, he should be he was one himself.

  • Alexwilliamz

    Won;t they need to wait to see what happens with the change to boundaries first? Other wise we might see candidates selected for seats that evaporate?

    • Chilbaldi

      I think they are selecting on the basis that the boundary changes will be effected.

  • 1earthmother2

    The constituency I live in,Norwich North is due to select soon for an all woman shortlist.I see no reason why the candidate selection can’t be widened out in the way Iain McNicol suggests,involving as many in the community who are generally supportive and who wish to be involved,not just for party members.I’m pretty sure Hollande’s success in France was helped by a similar process.Others locally may not share this view of course but what’s to lose?
    We need as many people as possible to agree an opponent to Chloe Smith(Osborne’s own personal human shield) in Ian Gibson’s old seat which has to be winnable.

  • andykinsey

    community organising… :) 
    movement for change anyone? :)

  • andykinsey

    community organising… :) 
    movement for change anyone? :)

  • Declan Walsh

    My concern is that it will be centrally selected party apparatchiks parachuted in and the local people will have little choice in whom they would select.

  • AlanGiles

    Let us just hope quality rather than quantity is the watchword, otherwise we will have  Mandy’s friends and fresh-from-University Georgia Gould’s handed safe seats.

    It would be nice to think Birkenhead would be getting a Labour MP again – any sign of you-know-who retiring?

    * Ulf Linde (1928 –     )

    • treborc1

      Unless labour push  him to walking across the floor,  well he is nearly their anyway

       

  • UKAzeri

    I like the emphasis on Labour’s core vote rather than swingers! Refreshing admission of a failed aproach !

  • Pingback: It’s time for the party to fête our activists like we do our financial donors | Prem

Latest

  • News Self-harm in mental health hospitals risen by over 50%

    Self-harm in mental health hospitals risen by over 50%

    Luciana Berger, Shadow Minister for Public Health, has found that between 2010 and 2013 the number of people in mental health institutions who have attempted suicide or who have been found self-harming has risen by over 50%. At 29 of the NHS’s 52 mental health trusts, the number of suicide attempts and cases of self-harming rose from 14,815 in 2010 to 23,053 last year –  an increase of 56% . These figures, obtained by the Labour Party through a Freedom of […]

    Read more →
  • Featured We English need a debate like the Scots

    We English need a debate like the Scots

    I’m envious of my Scottish friends. From my limited connection to politics north of the border, the debate between politicians seems a clash between rival empty words. A coalition of dramatically different parties, there are good reason why the No campaign can’t tell a concrete story about what the United kingdom will stay together to do. But the Yes side rallies vagueness as much as hope. The SNP can’t answer basic questions about the institutions they’ll rule with. Alex Salmond […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Why Pakistanis should be angry as everyone else with what happened in Rotherham

    Why Pakistanis should be angry as everyone else with what happened in Rotherham

    The exposé of child sexual abuse in Rotherham over 16 years reads more like a horror story than an academic report. It was more than a dossier on how girls (and a few boys) were abused by gangs of men; it was also a damning indictment of multiple cover-ups at a senior institutional level. The details simply beggar belief. This isn’t the first time either. Nearly ten years ago there were similar reports of institutional failure in Keighley involving the abuse […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Farage might be UKIP’s candidate but only Labour has the answers in South Thanet

    Farage might be UKIP’s candidate but only Labour has the answers in South Thanet

    Now that Nigel Farage has announced he is throwing his hat in the ring, South Thanet is a two horse race: Labour and UKIP. The Tories have selected a former UKIP Leader meaning there is now no difference between the Tories and UKIP. With this, the Tories have abandoned the centre ground and gambled everything on trying to out-UKIP UKIP. It is clear now for people in Broadstairs, Cliftonville, Ramsgate and Sandwich that the only way to stop the two […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour must call for an in/out EU referendum

    Labour must call for an in/out EU referendum

    The article entitled, “Should Labour offer a referendum on the EU,” provides a comprehensive and detailed set of arguments against offering a referendum on the United Kingdom’s membership of the EU.  They are strategic arguments and initially one can fully understand the rationale behind them – allowing the Eurosceptic vote to split, gaining the support of business and picking up disaffected Liberal Democrat voters. However, there are some fundamental weaknesses in Younespour’s arguments. Dismissing UKIP is a crucial error. Whether […]

    Read more →