The Lib Dems – not as bad as UKIP

May 7, 2012 9:06 am

The Liberal Democrats suffered heavy loses in Thursday’s local elections, losing 336 Councillors and dropping below 3,000 Councillors for the first time in their history. The party were deserted by activists and voters alike. In Edinburgh, a Lib Dem candidate won fewer votes than a man in penguin suit.

Any Labour activist who fought local elections against Lib Dems would be forgiven for finding this, well, pretty damn funny. The Lib Dems are notoriously difficult to campaign against. In the past they have positioning themselves simultaneously to the left and right of Labour. They have taken votes from Labour championing national policies that are popular but near impossible to actually deliver. They have courted the “anti-politics” vote, free from the responsibilities of government to be “holier than thou.”

The Lib Dems can also be masters of extreme negative campaigning. Labour posters mysteriously defaced or sabotaged. Those dodgy bar charts. Leaflets containing negative attacks on Labour candidates, designed to drive down turnout in key Labour areas.

Yes the Lib Dems can be a nightmare to campaign against. But we need to ask ourselves, is it really preferable for the Lib Dems to be overtaken by UKIP as the “third party” in England? Sure, it’s fun to watch the Tories scrabble about, tearing themselves apart over Europe. In a general election, UKIP might even take enough votes of the Tories to hand victory to Labour.

But UKIP also drag the centre ground dangerously to the right. UKIP want to repeal the Human Rights Act. UKIP argue against multiculturalism. UKIP are against pensions justice. They are anti-immigration, anti-clean energy, and anti-gay-marriage. For many years UKIP have been attacking  maternity leave and other fundamental workers rights. One UKIP Councillor recently questioned whether people on benefits should have the right to vote.

In contrast, pre-coalition Liberal Democrats at times moved the centre ground to the left. In opposition the Lib Dems made the case for social justice. They argued in favour of progressive taxation. They supported civil liberties. They were in favour of nuclear disarmament. Many Lib Dems supported the trade union movement. I even spotted a number of Lib Dem banners at 2011’s March for the Alternative.

During the 2010 general election, I spent a few hours as a teller on a polling station in Islington. The Lib Dem teller who accompanied me was a lovely elderly gentleman; a dedicated activist who had previously been a member of the SDP. I playfully teased him, telling him that the Lib Dems would go into coalition with the Conservatives (the local Lib Dems had been incensed at the very suggestion when we put out a leaflet speculating that this was a possibility). He said he was appalled at the idea of a coalition with the Tories, though he rather hoped for a coalition with Labour.

Things didn’t work out as he would have liked. The Lib Dems did enter into a coalition with the Conservatives. It turned out Lib Dems in government weren’t quite like Lib Dems in opposition.

On 3 May 2012 there was a Council by-election in Islington’s Holloway ward, a seat the Lib Dems had held in 2006. They finished fourth with just 12% of the vote (down 17% from May 2010).

The Liberal Democrats can be formidable opposition. I should delight at their apparent decline. But I frankly, I would much rather the platform of the” third party” in English politics be given to a party that acknowledges the importance of equality and social justice, than a party that questions basic and fundamental human rights.

  • http://theredandblackstork.wordpress.com/ Czarny kapturek

    This article makes sense.  When I was active in my local CLP (when I lived in GB) there was plenty anti-LibDem feelings among members, something I disagreed with as I knew some Lib Dem activists who were fairly sound in their policies.  Of course, I can’t stand what their party are doing now, but indeed, rather them than the racist UKIP.

    Seeing as the Tories are facing calls to go even further to the right, partly to stave off the UKIP threat, it would make sense for the Lib Dems to try to come across as being left-wing.  I’m not a fan of “Respect”, but perhaps they’ll contribute to a general swing to the left, a swing being seen in Greece, France, Slovakia and Holland.  A more left-wing Lib Dems would though require a new leader, and I can’t see them getting rid of Clegg.

    Of course, it would help if we were to go further to the left ourselves.

    • JoeDM

       In what way is UKIP racist? 

      I am not a member, but it seemst to me to be the most meritocratic and least judgmental of all the major parties.

      • Redshift

        You what? What are you taking this week Joe?

      • aracataca

        How so?

        • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

          Honestly this really is getting silly. I wish I had some emotikons!

      • Slakah

        I wouldn’t call them racist, but I certainly would not say their meritocratic, even proposing a flat rate of income tax shows that to be completely false.

        • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

          “meritocratic”?
          Who he?

          • Slakah

            I’m dyslexic, I try hard to avoid these mistakes, but sometimes I slip up. Thanks for the correction though.

          • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

            In no way is meritocratic spelled wrongly.
            What I was asking was what it actually meant.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=620287541 Kevin Leonard

      The question of leadership is the main priority for the LibDems in my opinion as Clegg is determined to continue as leader until he is awarded his Bribe of the top job in Europe currently held by Baroness(unelected)Ashton. As it is a job for which there is no electorate involved it is the only one available to him now he and many others are un-electable. 

      The biggest mistake the Lib Dems made during the last election campaign was to pledge support to the party with most seats, what they should have said was they would support a minority government in the things they agreed with and fight them in the things they did not.
      As for the surge in UKIP does this not tell you what the polls are already saying and that is the electorate or at least in the latest poll 80% of them demand a referendum on European membership.

      IF the LibDems are serious about doing what is right by the people of Britain then they must be willing to follow what the people of Britain want and not be swayed by the bright lights of cabinet office potential.

      I am of the view that ALL mainstream political parties have one agenda which they all share and it is self preservation and screw the voters and what they would like. I also believe that due to this coalition of liars tax avoiders and arrogant bully boy millionaires there will need to be blood on the streets of England before any real change within the political landscape is made.

    • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

      Left? Right?
      Sloppy thinking.
      Explain.

      • PaulHalsall

        Left and right have been used in political discussion for over two centuries.

        The exact policies supported vary from country to country.
        In the US Obama is consider left, but his actual policies would put him on the right of the UK Tory Party.

        In France, by contrast, the Right, as represented by the UMP, espouses state economic intervention and support of social cohesion policies that really after not very different from say certain *right wing* or even *center-left* Labour politicians in the UK.

        • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

          And in Communist China……..

          But you, what do you mean? In Uk where we both live.

      • Slakah

        They are on the far right, a flat income tax rate pretty much highlights how they’re the UKs Tea Party (wait for the backlash when they get more coverage).

    • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

      “ the racist UKIP.”
      Sloppy thinking. What evidence do you have of this?

  • LordElpus

    Alice Perry:-
    “They have taken votes from Labour championing national policies that are popular but near impossible to actually deliver.”

    Kevin Leonard:-
    “As for the surge in UKIP does this not tell you what the polls are
    already saying and that is the electorate or at least in the latest poll
    80% of them demand a referendum on European membership.”

    The last Labour government and the Conservative party now in power promised a referendum on EU membership. Both inserted that many conditions that their promise wasn’t worth the paper it was written on. The sight of both party’s dancing around desperately trying to find any means whatsoever to not provide a referendum to which they both know the answer beforehand is sickening.

    UKIP will continue to rise whilst the main parties ignore the main thrust for their reason for being.

    So Alice why is it that both Labour and Conservative parties find that they can “champion a national policy” of a referendum on EU membership but yet find it “near impossible to deliver”?

  • LordElpus

    Alice Perry:-
    “They have taken votes from Labour championing national policies that are popular but near impossible to actually deliver.”

    Kevin Leonard:-
    “As for the surge in UKIP does this not tell you what the polls are
    already saying and that is the electorate or at least in the latest poll
    80% of them demand a referendum on European membership.”

    The last Labour government and the Conservative party now in power promised a referendum on EU membership. Both inserted that many conditions that their promise wasn’t worth the paper it was written on. The sight of both party’s dancing around desperately trying to find any means whatsoever to not provide a referendum to which they both know the answer beforehand is sickening.

    UKIP will continue to rise whilst the main parties ignore the main thrust for their reason for being.

    So Alice why is it that both Labour and Conservative parties find that they can “champion a national policy” of a referendum on EU membership but yet find it “near impossible to deliver”?

    • treborc1

       Because we had one and we voted to enter, you all want one to leave, well you may have to wait until either Mandy joins UKIP and takes millions with him.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=620287541 Kevin Leonard

        Britain has never had a referendum on joining the European super state. We had a vote about joining the European Economic Community but the political parasite led coalition of parties in Brussels and their ever demanding criteria for more political control and less democratic  input is not something any have voted for except the political class who all stand to benefit from the EU.
        Democracy no longer exists in the old fashioned meaning of the word it has been hijacked by the monetary elite.

        • Cari_esky5

          We had a referendum for leaving the EEC or staying in it.  Heath had already taken us in without a vote. 

          • treborc1

            We are in….

  • aracataca

    IMHO the Lib Dems are beneath contempt and their campaigning tactics have been grossly underplayed in the article here. Their astonishing capacity to be economical with the truth has been a feature of their politics for decades.  In my local area they went on the doorstep telling people there was no Labour candidate ( they were presenting themselves as a left alternative to the Tories at the time) even though they knew perfectly well that there was a Labour candidate standing.
    They also have the ability to induce nausea, eg Cleggy’s speech on Friday saying that the Labour party must prove that it is not simply a party of protest. This from the leader of a party that ‘was’ the party of protest par excellence.  They’re liars, flaky and without any integrity whatsoever and now they have been found out big time. Obviously I disagree with UKIP but as the old addage goes, at least you kind of know where you are with them.

    • treborc1

       You would or should know who is standing in your area, and I suspect you explain to the liberals by closing the door on their faces.

      In my area we had a labour council since 1909 it was Liberal before that, but it was lost twelve years ago and labour has failed to get it back, yet we send a Labour MP to Parliament every time with a massive majority.
      But our labour council had this labour complex it would never lose so could basically ignore the voters, now it cannot get the council back

      • aracataca

        No I was campaigning at the time. Libs don’t come to my door they know they will get turned away or engaged in endless time wasting (for their canvassers) conversations.

        • treborc1

          Bit like labour at my door.

  • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

    UKIP represent the Conservative voters who have been disenfranchised by the Coalition and by the heir to Blair as PM. No wonder you do not like them! But Labour will certainly gain over the division of the traditional Conservative vote.

    BNP are now pretty well dead, but the EDL had a rally over the week-end in Luton which attracted several thousand very angry people. It was not properly or fairly reported on the BBC, however. It is not unfair to compare their outrage with that of the racist/nationalist Adolf Hitler and his success in the 1930s. In the 1920s when there was prosperity all round, he was neglected. Only after the slump did he rise, meteorically, to power. We face a permanent slump now and “investment” and “soaking the rich” are becoming slogans which people like Adolf really relished. Luckily the EDP have no leader – yet.

    Liberals? Forget it!

    • treborc1

      Well I suspect the election after next once we have forgotten about the Liberals sell out, UKIP will be struggling to keep it’s position and the Liberals will be back in third place  hoping for another coalition

  • David MacDonald

     
    I have stood as a UKIP candidate for three local elections and have picked up votes from “Old Labour” people as well as from disillusioned Tories. I can tell you, my Labour friends, that you too have a problem with UKIP for three reasons:
     
    Firstly mass open-doors immigration is very unpopular with your core support but it cannot be stopped for as long as we remain in the EU.
     
    Secondly as any canvasser knows and even the dogs in the street will tell you, particularly in any council house street, many people can see that too far too much in the way of “benefits” is directed at those who could work but don’t.
     
    Finally, many core Labour voters have “don’t vote Tory” inscribed into their DNA but this does not translate to “don’t vote for UKIP” (the big danger for UKIP is that it looks too much like the “Alternative Tory Party”).

    • treborc1

       Secondly as any canvasser knows and even the dogs in the street will
      tell you, particularly in any council house street, many people can see
      that too far too much in the way of “benefits” is directed at those who
      could work but don’t.

      Your right you do sound like the Tories.

      • David MacDonald

        Try talking to people, particularly in the poorer areas; the issue causes great resentment.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

          I do. I think there is far more concern about the lack of available jobs – everyone knows there are simply not enough to go round. Which is why we gained 70%+ in our wards – and over 90% in two of them

          • David MacDonald

            Yes, I agree, ultimately it’s about the economy and jobs. Neither the Tories nor Labour are really credible about the economy, nor is UKIP …..yet.

        • treborc1

          I do not need to talk to them I’m one of them for god sake

        • treborc1

          Thank god I’m well off then on benefits

    • Slakah

      I’m sorry but UKIP isn’t an alternative Tory Party, it’s the UK branch of the Tea Party. 
      http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100115417/ukip-the-party-of-englands-reticent-majority/ 
      http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/11/tea-party-british-gain-ukip 
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-g0e8Hd3Ps 
      Can you please tell me why Nigel Farage wants to increase the taxes of those who earn between 11k and 31k. This is one reason why when UKIP get more and more coverage they’ll no longer be dodge any non EU central questions, and will have to face criticism on their domestic policy. My Gran votes UKIP, she wants stronger EU controls, more statesmen like politicians and more jobs for the young, but I’m quite annoyed at how misleading UKIP are, by trying to present themselves as a party for the poor.

      This is well worth a watch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ae_1lktDVxk&feature=related . Nigel wants to increase tax for the poor, and is not even slightly economically credible, competent or sensible.

  • wg

    “they supported civil
    liberties”

    Graham Watson, LibDem
    MEP – the European Arrest Warrant – and passed by a Labour government.

     

    But what have “the
    left” to do with civil liberties – the last Labour government seemed to me to
    be the most authoritarian, “right wing” junta I’ve experienced in my voting
    lifetime.

    Thousands of children
    had their fingerprints and DNA taken and stored, town halls snooped on private
    e-mails, people were subjected to rendition and torture, attempts were made to
    imprison suspects indefinitely, and Labour attempted to impose compulsory ID
    cards – of course, not forgetting the ultimate “racism” of pouring missiles
    into the high-rise buildings of foreign countries killing thousands.

     

    I am a UKIP supporter,
    and no, I’m no more racist than the next person – but I do believe that massive
    immigration has harmed the chances of our young to make progress in their
    lives.

    Labour lecture the
    present government on the “disenfranchised of Tottenham” but those people were
    Labour’s children, Labour were in power for thirteen years – what did Labour do
    for them apart from importing masses of cheap labour and allowing businesses to
    shirk their responsibility of training and employing those young people.

     

    If it’s a choice
    between Labour completely abandoning its own people, the Conservatives
    exploiting their own people, and the chancer LibDems trying to pull the wool
    over the people’s eyes – then I either don’t vote at all or I vote for someone
    who is going to stand up for me – as a working class tradesman.

     

    And then there is the
    European Union – state corporatism in action – witness Greece.

    Denied referendums –
    the Lisbon Treaty, assisted by Labour and leaving the European people with huge
    departments that have to be funded by the European people who have not given
    their mandate, and ignored referendums – Holland, France, and Ireland.

     

    If the answer is “the
    European Union” then the question is definitely not “what is democracy?”

     

    Alice, you seem to be
    of the same opinion as Jim Murphy who recently said:

    “This is a local defeat with
    enormous national interest. Our task has to be to prevent it from becoming a
    national phenomena where disenchanted voters who want change send for anyone
    other than the established parties.”

     

    The people mustn’t
    vote UKIP the people must always vote for the three-party stitch-up – either
    that or the people must be changed.

     

    Incidentally, only
    220,000 people voted for UKIP and most of those votes were taken because the
    LibDem protest vote was not available, and Labour has been the chief
    beneficiary of the deserting LibDem activist – you can’t have it all ways.

     

      

     

     

    • Redshift

      Well at least this is a coherent rant. lol

      • wg

        Damn keyboard :)

    • Slakah

      I implore you to look at this 
      http://www.ukip.org/content/ukip-policies/2560-ukip-tax-policy , from UKIPs very own website. Basically this states that if you earn above £11K and below £37K you will get an 11% tax increase, this party does not represent working class voters. They (even more so than the tories) want to reduce taxes on the rich, and force working class people to pay for it.

      • wg

        Noted – thank you.

        I shall look into how it works.

  • Redshift

    The UKIP share of the vote may have risen, but this is a party that has sod all knowledge of how to campaign. How many council seats did their vote share rise actually translate into? Why is it the Greens (and until very recently the BNP) can win geographically restricted seats and UKIP can’t? They do well in Euro elections but there is no evidence whatsoever that they can achieve a breakthrough. 

    Also, we had the Referendum Party in the 90s. As soon as Labour went into power it mostly folded back into Tory support, I suggest that a lot of their support is protest voting. Until the day that Tory MPs decide on mass to form another party or join UKIP, they will get nowhere. 

    • wg

      You are correct that UKIP don’t have the relationships that other parties have formed with local communities.

      The thing is that when I go to UKIP presentations there aren’t that many “blazers” about – there are just as many “ordinary people”.

      The big problem here though is that there are a mass of completely pissed-off non voters – like the coalition the Labour party don’t have masses of votes, they just have a large portion of votes given by a minority of voters. 

      None of the big three can claim to be representatives of the people.

    • treborc1

      We will know how the public feel in three years time in a general election this will determine the Liberal and the UKIP , labour and Tories ,party not council elections.

      We all know Parties can win councils and then get hammered at a general election

      • wg

        Agreed – and the next General Election will indicate the depth of tribal instinct.

        So far the Tories have proved as pro EU as Labour and the LibDems – but the EU slides down the list of importance when the fear of the other party kicks in.

        Most will revert back to form.

      • Redshift

        What I am saying is that until (or indeed if) UKIP can learn how to develop themselves organisationally within specific localities they will continue to under-perform in term of taking seats that are based on geographical boundaries – and fail to breakthrough either in local government or as a parliamentary group. 

        Euroelections work over entire regions. That suits top-down media-based organisation. UKIP can do that. But so far they have utterly failed as a party that has the troops on the ground. Not only are the three main parties better at grassroots organisation but minor parties like the Greens, Respect, the BNP and the colourful mix of local independent candidates and parties also out-perform UKIP in FPTP elections. I’d be embarrassed by the performance in this year’s local elections if I was a UKIP activist. 

        • wg

          I’ll be honest here Redshift – I have never really seen UKIP as a parliamentary party; I have always regarded it as a campaigning single-issue party.

          It is the wholesale betrayal of the British people that has me voting for them – I can’t even say that it is a protest vote because that would imply that I wish the three main parties to reconsider their policies to somehow become acceptable to me.

          I am sick of politics generally – the party and whip system make a mockery of democratic representation.

          I’m also fed up of this swinging pendulum, Buggins’ turn act – not to mention the expenses scandal.

          Why do we condemn the coalition for a mandate-less government and congratulate Labour for gaining victory on such a small number of actual votes.

          It’s democracy that is the loser all around. 

          As for embarrassment, we UKIPers love the ridicule – it’s nice to know that we’ve annoyed someone enough to make them kick us.

          • LordElpus

             ”I am sick of politics generally – the party and whip system make a mockery of democratic representation.”

            Completely agree.

  • PaulHalsall

    I think the article makes some sense, but purely from a Labour point of view a splintering of the political right would be good for us.  Just as the SDP delivered Thatcher massively larger majorities than otherwise, so a new (but split) alignment on the right would help us.

    On the other hand, the Tory party has not been the most successful political party in the world since, say, Pitt the Younger, without a great deal of electoral savvy.  As others have pointed out it has reliably represented the prejudices (if not the actual interests) of the middle class in the South East of England for most of that time.

    • treborc1

      Well now they have competition with labour being the party of the middle class.

  • Jacob

    That’s alright, we don’t need a third national party. Let them become the Cornish Plaid.

    • PaulHalsall

      A third party is not entirely a bad thing.

      Although I have voted Labour and only Labour since 1983, because I prioritise social justice, the authoritarianism of the New Labour government drove me crazy.

      Raising more and bigger prisons; ID cards; making cannabis a B level substance;  snooping laws; ending double jeopardy protections and so forth.  Sometimes I felt ashamed to support a party that included David Blunkett, Jack Straw and Jackie Smith. (But the Tories would have no problem with many of these things either.)

      The LDs did keep up, as far as I can see, a clearly liberal/progressive concern on civil liberty and constitutional issues.  That is a necessary part of British politics, given the authoritarianism of too many Labour politicians once in power.

  • Mike Murray

    The Liberal Democrat stooges are technically parasites. They will never be elected in sufficient numbers to form a government of their own. They therefore have to hope that no party will have overall control. They will then attach themselves to this political “host” for whom they will completely change their political identity in order to engage in the  political equivalent of symbiosis and therefore retain a position in government. 
     
    That is why the Liberal Democrats will speak to any brief: why they worship Janus, the God of two faces, and it is why they present themselves as Socialists in the North and Conservatives  in the South. If we give the impression that we are cosying up to them after the enormity of their betrayal over the rate of deficit reduction; after their betrayal on tuition fees; and their betrayal on the NHS, we will alienate all of those people, particularly young people,  who have abandoned them because they are disgusted by their betrayal and have seen exactly what kind of hypocrites they are. This Tory government is  only able to put 700,000 public sector workers out of work because it has the support of the Liberal Democrat Stooges.Remember that.  The Liberal Democrats are always the party of capital. Remember that too. It was the Liberals who oppressed the suffragettes and sent the troops into the Welsh coalmining valleys.
     
    I loathe UKIP’s policies (apart from the in/out referendum) but at least I know what they stand for. The Liberal Democrat stooges only have one policy and one strategy, which is to piggy back into power on the back of another party, no matter which, and for that reward they will forget all their promises to the electorate.   If they wish to prove that this is not the case they should categorically say before the General Election poll exactly which Party thay are prepared to go into coalition with. But they will never do that because they always want to hedge their bets.  

  • Adam


    basic and fundamental human rights.” Didn’t realise benefits were a fundamental right? People have the right to be free, pursue their own ends and be left alone if that’s what they want. You socialist never truly understood what rights are. Freedom from government coercion is a fundamental right not the entitlement to other peoples money. 

  • Pingback: The Lib Dems – not as bad as UK | Cllr Alice Perry

Latest

  • News Seats and Selections Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft selected as Labour’s PPC for Lewisham Deptford

    Vicky Foxcroft has been selected by Lewisham Deptford CLP as the party’s candidate for 2015 at a selection meeting this afternoon. Here’s a brief biography: Vicky grew up in the North West in a single parent household, and was the first person in her family to go to university. She has held many positions in the party including Chair of Labour Students, has sat on the National Policy Forum and is currently a local councillor and is Chair of Lewisham [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    The Labour Party have this afternoon suspended the selection process for Falkirk, after concerns were raised about “membership recruitment”. We understand that Ed Miliband was “keen to act swiftly” as the selection process was due to formally begin on Sunday. An officer of the party – yet to be confirmed – will investigate. A Labour spokesperson told us this afternoon: “We have suspended the start of the selection process of the Falkirk parliamentary seat. Concerns have been raised about membership [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Seats and Selections Unions Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    It is interesting to see that the Labour Party is returning to the vexed issue of its parliamentary selection process. The changes may be well and good.  But maybe we should be asking a bigger question – are we  witnessing the end of working class representation in Parliament? When the Labour Party was first founded it was more simple. Then the explicit  aim was to secure working class representation, and specifically organised labour, in Parliament. Inevitably it became more complicated [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    Earlier this week we brought you a decidedly dodgy bar chart from the Tories, but it seems that they’re not the only party in Camden adopting dubious use of bar charts. Step forward Camden Lib Dems, with this classic of the dodgy Lib Dem bar chart genre (courtesy of Theo Blackwell). Even by the pretty shoddy standards of the yellows, this is a corker:   Update: Haringey Lib Dems might want to work on their bar charts  maths too (via [...]

    Read more →