You are here: Home » News »

Why did Boris have the lawyers out last night?

May 5, 2012 5:13 pm

Author:

Tags:

Share this Article

Allegra Stratton got tongues wagging on Twitter this afternoon when she revealed that the Boris Johnson campaign had lawyers at the ready last night who were prepared to issue an injunction against the results being announced in the event of a Livingstone victory.

But Ken obviously lost by 60,000 votes, so why did they have lawyers at the ready? They didn’t think it was still close did they?

Well the word from a well connected source is that the Johnson campaign actually thought that their candidate had lost by three hundred votes on second preferences. The lawyers were there to stop the result being announced.

But why did the Johnson campaign think they had lost? I’m told that someone in the Boris campaign wasn’t completely clear on the rules for 2nd preferences. Not realising that a large chunk of second preferences aren’t used to determine the victor, they had got their sums wrong and predicted the narrowest of Livingstone victories – even going as far as informing Downing Street that Livingstone was worryingly close to a win.

The lawyers were still there right up until the final moment when the results were announced – which may well explain Johnson’s somewhat hangdog expression on stage, and his lacklustre victory speech. Livingstone by contrast, had known that he’d lost, and by how much, for hours.

Related posts:

  1. That famous Boris Johnson temper
  2. Boris retains poll lead – but 78% believe he is Mayor for the rich
  3. Boris and Ken – the final poll
  4. Ken close behind Boris with YouGov
  5. Boris is the bookies’ favourite – but only just
  • http://twitter.com/RobbieScott100 Robbie Scott

    yawn

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001102865655 John Ruddy

    If Livingstone HAD won by a few hundred second preference votes – what grounds would the lawyers have had for stopping the announcement?

  • alexagiusuk

    Perhaps team Boris was concerned with the massive voter fraud?

  • Roger

    Were I  Boris I would also have had the lawyers at the ready. In many ways I wish Livingstone had “won” by 300 votes and Boris had called his lawyers in. We’ve been sweeping voter fraud under the carpet for far too long and at some point the issue needs to be addressed.  

    Labour members aren’t my natural soul mates but I’ve never one who wasn’t outraged by voter fraud. Since this is largely an issue (on mainland Britain) for Labour candidates its in Labour’s interests to be seen to be making the first moves here. Will they ? 

Latest

  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    By Rob Marchant

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Is party politics dying out?

    Is party politics dying out?

    By Mark Ferguson

    This week has brought the role of party members and activists back to the front pages. That’s rather unusual to be honest – and rightly so, as party members (swivel eyed and otherwise) make up only 1% of the British population. Being a party member is already a niche interest. You are somewhat odd if you’re a party member – sorry to break that to you, but of course I’m odd too (and quite possibly odder than you). What swivel-eyed [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    From: HERBERT, Nick Sent: 20 May 2013 16:29 To: HERBERT, Nick Subject: Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill – voting today   Dear Colleague Thank you for your support for the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill at Second Reading. You will be aware of the amendments tabled by Tim Loughton and others (new Clauses 10 & 11) to extend civil partnerships to heterosexual couples I have no issue with the principle of this proposal, but I am very worried that adding this measure to the [...]

    Read more →
  • News Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whilst the Westminster village has been working itself up into a lather over the rise of UKIP and when/if there should be an EU referendum, the DWP snuck out a report on the evidence of DWP league tables that we brought you recently. It’s a total whitewash. The report – which you can read here – argues that claims of a league table are entirely down to individual managers at a number of job centres. You could call it the [...]

    Read more →