You are here: Home » Comment »

1.8 million reasons for celebrating Labour’s child poverty ambition

June 12, 2012 8:57 pm

Author:

Tags:

Share this Article

New research by a number of distinguished experts published today by the Child Poverty Action Group explores how Labour’s unprecedented commitment to reduce child poverty affected families in the UK during its time in office.

The verdict is unambiguous: as Mike Brewer puts it ‘“The extra investment on benefits and tax credits for families with children between 1997 and 2010 increased incomes amongst millions of families in the bottom half of the income distribution, not just those clustered around the poverty line, providing an unprecedented improvement to the material wellbeing of British families.’

The report is not just about incomes: there is a wealth of detail on child development, social mobility, housing, child protection and education – far too much to summarise here. But there is one big finding that Labour supporters may want to commit to memory :

• Without the major increases in financial support to families with children that Labour introduced, child poverty would be an estimated 1.8 million higher in 2010. (see Mike Brewer here).

The report is not an uncritical endorsement of Labour’s record: there is criticism of lack of progress over Labour’s last five years in power, of the failure to establish a universal affordable childcare service and of much more. And of course Labour did not meet its ambitious target of halving child poverty by 2010.

That said, does anyone seriously believe that Labour would have kept 1.8 million children out of income poverty without setting itself such unforgiving targets?

For those of us who have been critical of aspects of Labour’s record this report is a reminder of what can be achieved with commitment backed by resources and serious policy innovation. For many in Labour, the child poverty ambition defined what was best about the party in government. Today’s report shows that there was a solid body of achievement corresponding to that ambition.

Related posts:

  1. Labour must oppose cuts to child benefit and defend our record on child poverty
  2. Don’t be fooled by today’s child poverty figures
  3. Child poverty: Labour needs to stand up for its objectives as well as its record
  4. Tories planned to “stop monitoring child poverty”
  5. Parents in poverty need extra financial support during school holidays
  • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

    Let us take a single Mum who is working for the minimum wage and finding it hard to make ends meet. Actually, let us also say that she finds it easiest to relax on her computer playing Bingo once her three children are in bed. And that will mean she is in debt. A lot in debt. Like £30,000. So far, people have taken pity on her. But soon she will have to go to the loan sharks because she is not going to give up her only relaxation is she? And the debt keeps on rising too because she isn’t doing anything about it. Every now and then an expert social worker pops her head in and assumes everything is OK because the children are looking healthy.

    Does anyone get the drift? A kind of parallel maybe?

    • postageincluded

      Very smart. But most single mothers don’t issue their own currency, so they don’t have the option to run a deficit while they sort out their gambling addiction. Unlike the UK government which does have that option, but chooses not to take it.

  • treborc1

    “That said, does anyone seriously believe that Labour would have kept 1.8
    million children out of income poverty without setting itself such
    unforgiving targets?”

    How much longer did you need.

Latest

  • Comment Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    Labour’s future schools policy: why accountability matters

    By Mike Ion

    Stephen Twigg, Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary is one of the more thoughtful and pragmatic individuals to hold this vitally important brief for some time. To his credit Stephen has been out and about these past two years listening to pupils, teachers, parents and governors and finding out more about the challenges they face on a day-to-day basis. In addition Stephen has been looking closely at some local, regional, national and international programmes that have had a demonstrable impact in raising [...]

    Read more →
  • News Seats and Selections Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    Falkirk selection process suspended by the party

    The Labour Party have this afternoon suspended the selection process for Falkirk, after concerns were raised about “membership recruitment”. We understand that Ed Miliband was “keen to act swiftly” as the selection process was due to formally begin on Sunday. An officer of the party – yet to be confirmed – will investigate. A Labour spokesperson told us this afternoon: “We have suspended the start of the selection process of the Falkirk parliamentary seat. Concerns have been raised about membership [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Seats and Selections Unions Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    Working Class MPs – the end of a era?

    By Paul Wheeler

    It is interesting to see that the Labour Party is returning to the vexed issue of its parliamentary selection process. The changes may be well and good.  But maybe we should be asking a bigger question – are we  witnessing the end of working class representation in Parliament? When the Labour Party was first founded it was more simple. Then the explicit  aim was to secure working class representation, and specifically organised labour, in Parliament. Inevitably it became more complicated [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    An absolutely classic Lib Dem bar chart

    Earlier this week we brought you a decidedly dodgy bar chart from the Tories, but it seems that they’re not the only party in Camden adopting dubious use of bar charts. Step forward Camden Lib Dems, with this classic of the dodgy Lib Dem bar chart genre (courtesy of Theo Blackwell). Even by the pretty shoddy standards of the yellows, this is a corker:   Update: Haringey Lib Dems might want to work on their bar charts  maths too (via [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Modern life is rubbish – We need to put Work and Home at the heart of everything we do

    Modern life is rubbish – We need to put Work and Home at the heart of everything we do

    By Mark Ferguson

    “Work and home is what One Nation is about – family life, how people live everyday life.” That’s what Jon Cruddas – the man who will in all likelihood write Labour’s next manifesto – told the Guardian the party’s policy review is focused on. And it sounds so simple – doesn’t it? Critics will say it’s too simplistic a definition (and they’d be right – I’m cherry picking here), but it’s also a brilliant example of the distance between most [...]

    Read more →