Dogma over reality – another backhanded attempt at privatisation?

June 13, 2012 5:30 pm

Backhanded attempts at privatisation are as synonymous with the Tories as workers’ rights are with Labour.

But there can be fewer instances as frustrating as the short-sightedness displayed by Fire and Rescue Minister Bob Neill when he described the sale of the Fire Service College as an opportunity to bring “innovation and investment”.

The decision is flawed on a variety of levels.

The only triumph is that of dogma over reality. Mr Neill effectively told us that only the private sector is capable of delivering a world class Fire Service College for years to come.

Mr Neill appears not to have grasped the contradiction contained in that statement.  In his previous sentence he reiterated that the college, run as a public concern since its inception, is an “asset of national importance with a world class reputation”. It is that lack of vision which repeatedly undermines this Government.  And it is that dismissive attitude towards the public sector which continues to damage any hopes we have of a swift economic recovery.

It seems the Government is terrified to throw any support behind a publicly funded enterprise, however strong the argument. But cutting off one’s nose to spite one’s face does not do justice to the scale of this ridiculous decision that is risking the future of an offering the Government recognises as “world class”.

You couldn’t write the script.

One line on which Mr Neill and I do agree is that the Fire College is a wonderful asset.  Governments from overseas send their firefighters there, such is the quality of the training on offer. It is true, too, that steps need to be taken to protect the future of the college while the Government liberally waves an axe at any service with the first name ‘public’. But that is not a reason to sell off such a marvellous asset to the highest bidder and promise that they will make a business of it.

The irony of this proposed privatisation is that much of the college’s income is derived from the nation’s Fire and Rescue Services that are being hammered by the funding cuts by the same minister who is sponsoring the sale. But the Government’s desire to dispose of this national resource might yet be undone with potential bidders said to be viewing the sale with considerable caution. Some insiders believe the sale will only go ahead if the Government offers an ongoing revenue subsidy as a sweetener, but that would undermine the justification for sale.

I have submitted a number written parliamentary questions seeking assurances from the Fire Minister that additional public subsidies will not be made available to enable the Government to indulge its ideology.  I am still awaiting a reply!

Chris Williamson MP is the shadow fire minister

  • treborc1

    Some of us can remember the battles with the labour party over the fire service , pay and working conditions. Then labour decided to let us all know that Fire officers spent all night sleeping and doing second jobs.

    Yes the Tories are going to do the Privatization bit again as they always do, and when labour comes back in they will do what.

    Should we fight it yes and I’d like to hear for once Miliband coming out and telling us what labour think, you know we have had a number of deaths over the years from our fire fighters putting life at risk and dying in our service.

    It would be nice to hear Miliband speak, sadly i suspect it will be silence

    • Daniel Speight

      All it takes is for the Eds to say they will renationalize it without compensation and that  would scare any buyers away, but somehow I doubt that will happen.

      I see Ed Miliband is still supporting Tom Baldwin over his orders* to the shadow cabinet not to link the BSkyB takeover with phone hacking. That was a coward’s stance and wrong. Even if it was before the story broke of the murdered girl’s phone being hacked, the circumstances were the same before as after it.

      *Why does the party allow these unelected spin doctors to hand out orders.

  • JC

    So you’re suggesting that only your political opponents follow any sort of dogma, and you’re purely realistic with no axe to grind or preconceived opinions at all? I’m not convinced. 

    By all means present your views, but to suggest that anything else is driven by dogma while you are purely altruistic is not true.

    • James3010

       so very true, we all to often hear that “small state” is tory dogma which is part true but so is the equal argument that Lab is the party of “big state” for its own dogmatic reasons but here is the question, why is big state better than small? i have yet to hear a rational explanation.

    • aracataca

      The bunch of malign comedians currently running the country are the biggest dogmatists since Thatcher, hence,for example,  their decision to cut the 50p rate to 45p. Conversely, Blair and Brown were far more pragmatic they were too frightened of losing elections to be anything else. It is because the last Labour government was not dogmatic that it attracts so much ire on here from Treborc & co.

  • Dave Postles

    Close Protection of the Third Kind?  Chris, thanks for this information, but we need your colleagues to join with you in condemning it.  You are a good man and fight for proper public services, but it sometimes feels that you are a lone political voice at Westminster.

Latest

  • Featured Becoming a Living Wage City – an ambition worth having

    Becoming a Living Wage City – an ambition worth having

    A cleaner met me on the corridor the other day as I was leaving the office and gave me a huge hug. “Thank you, City Mayor,” she told me “that’s been the best news for years.” After I had recovered from my embarrassment, I realised what she was talking about. Salford had just introduced the full Living Wage – becoming the first local authority in Greater Manchester to implement a full Living Wage of £7.45 for every member of staff [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    Planning the revolution – Labour and the Spending Review

    In four weeks time the Chancellor will announce the results of the 2015 spending Review. There won’t be many winners but some will have lost more than others. Political commentators and discussion forums will pass judgement and public sector managers will, yet again, pick through the debris, making do and mending from what ever they can salvage. Before we get overtaken by the detail we should reflect on the bigger picture. What ever the chancellor says on June 26th it [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment A call for action at the G8

    A call for action at the G8

    In less than a month’s time, the UK hosts the G8 Summit. With hunger, tax, trade and transparency all on the agenda, the UK has a unique opportunity to show global leadership on these issues. The scale of hunger is devastating. There is enough food in the world for everyone, yet 1 billion people still go hungry. 2.3 million children every year die from malnutrition – to put that in perspective, that is around 16,000 children every day. Or one [...]

    Read more →
  • News TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run – Media roundup: May 24th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. TUC suggests Football World Cup vote should be re-run “The TUC along with its international equivalent – the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) – is calling on UEFA to address the appalling treatment of workers and players in Qatar and [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    A Northern Tory that Labour should be afraid of

    The Labour Party spends a great deal of time beating itself up over its performance in Southern England. We know it simply isn’t good enough, but we can’t seem to put our finger on why exactly that’s the case. Is it demographics? No. Culture? Perhaps. Lack of basic party organisation in some areas? It’s certainly a factor. But whilst we’re flagellating ourselves over our inability to perform south of the Watford gap (outside of London), we should remember that the [...]

    Read more →