One Nation, One Olympics

June 14, 2012 9:51 am

The rural idyll Olympics!

Were you one of the many people surprised to see Danny Boyle’s designs for the Olympic opening ceremony unveiled yesterday? A design that recreates our green and pleasant land, with people and animals in the centre of the Olympic Stadium.

While it might not be what you were expecting Boyle’s design surely captures some of the things that many people, here and abroad, most value about Britain – our rural heritage, our landscape, the rolling hills, the wooded copse, the farm animals grazing in the fields, the flower filled meadows of the valleys; all in all a countryside that has motivated many thousands of people, from left and right, to campaign to ensure it is preserved for the enjoyment, livelihoods and benefits of this and future generations.

And did you know that it was the Labour Party (under Atlee) that brought into being The Town and Country Planning Act, to ensure managed and thoughtful development rather than a free for all across the land? And that Atlee’s government also created the first National Parks, while Hilary Benn, as Secretary of State Defra created the most recent, the South Downs National Park, in 2010). If you did, you are almost certainly in a minority.

Friends and comrades campaigning in rural constituencies have often told me that the people they canvass (of any political persuasion, or none) don’t believe that the Labour Party could be that interested or have been that bothered about the countryside – but we were, and should continue to be so.

As Danny Boyle’s inspired plan shows, the British countryside has a deep connection with Britons wherever they live, a connection held by the many. We only have to witness the membership numbers of the National Trust, and the RSPB. And as two of the largest mass membership organisations in the UK today, perhaps they also offer some lessons on the importance of national heritage, of biodiversity, of landscapes and all that makes up the natural environment to the revived policy review, particularly when we think about the issues of England and the many seats with a rural dimension and gaining a parliamentary majority in 2015.

We are the party of the Olympics – Labour should be clear that we are the party of the many in the countryside, as well as the many in the cities – that we are One Nation Labour.

  • PaulHalsall

    Almost no-one in the countryside votes for us.

    We are in fact the party of cities, towns, and working class people.

    • http://twitter.com/robertsjonathan Jonathan Roberts

       People in the countryside tend not to vote for us because a) our rural policy has become extremely weak and b) rural parties tend to face difficulties in organising and campaigning.  I knocked on the door of a woman in a village once who had lived in that house for 60 years and had never once even seen a Labour leaflet. She was happy to see me, we had a good chat and she promised to vote Labour at the upcoming election.  Contact is everything.

      By the way, there are many, many working class people in the countryside.  24% of farmers live in relative poverty for a start. 

      Labour once had a proud tradition of caring about the countryside and the rural way of life, but it has become ignored – in part because too few people in the Labour Party understand rural issues, and even fewer care.  That is a real shame.  If we only care about those in cities, then we can’t really claim to be the party of the people, given so many millions live in a rural or semi-rural setting.

      As soon as the party begins to care more about people in the countryside, then its knowledge-base will increase, better policy will come, more rural-dwellers will join the party and rural CLPs will become stronger leading, eventually, to us becoming more competitive.

  • AlanGiles

    “The Archers” comes to London E15. Bizarre!

  • http://twitter.com/RichardBrennan Richard

     I really don’t think the Labour Party should want to be seen as the party of the Olympics – t is an expensive waste of money that will be bad for Britain. Sky estimates the event will cost £24bn of public money – we should have spent that money on public services instead.  Many people plan to leave the country, which will hit the tourism budget Add to that the inconvenience that Londoners will suffer  (not least those with missiles near them), and it is a disgrace that Labour (and the Tories) supported the London bid.

    • http://twitter.com/robertsjonathan Jonathan Roberts

      cheer up Richard…

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    I not sure the policies cited in the article address the concerns of working people in rural areas and some of them positively work against their interests.

    Planning policies which prevent new housing being built protects the countryside but has resulted in many villages becoming little more than exclusive dormitories for people commuting to the local town or city. You only need to look at the disparity between the kind of wages paid by many rural jobs and the cost of homes in villages to see that village life is no longer an option for many rural workers.

    In preserving the countryside you have to ask what is it to be preserved as – a living, working place or as a glorified, idyllic housing estate for the rich.

Latest

  • News Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    From: HERBERT, Nick Sent: 20 May 2013 16:29 To: HERBERT, Nick Subject: Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill – voting today   Dear Colleague Thank you for your support for the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill at Second Reading. You will be aware of the amendments tabled by Tim Loughton and others (new Clauses 10 & 11) to extend civil partnerships to heterosexual couples I have no issue with the principle of this proposal, but I am very worried that adding this measure to the [...]

    Read more →
  • News Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whilst the Westminster village has been working itself up into a lather over the rise of UKIP and when/if there should be an EU referendum, the DWP snuck out a report on the evidence of DWP league tables that we brought you recently. It’s a total whitewash. The report – which you can read here – argues that claims of a league table are entirely down to individual managers at a number of job centres. You could call it the [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Equal Marriage is the most important thing – but Labour can’t let Equal Civil Partnerships get the “long grass” treatment

    Equal Marriage is the most important thing – but Labour can’t let Equal Civil Partnerships get the “long grass” treatment

    So after toying with support for the Tim Loughton amendment over the weekend, Labour has decided to abstain on that particular amendment, and propose their own. Let’s be clear – the most important news today is that Equal Marriage will pass through the commons, and that’s a cause for huge celebration for all but an isolated minority in the Labour Party. I made clear this morning that I didn’t buy the argument that supporting the Loughton amendment would stop or [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour’s Equal marriage Bill amendment on Civil Partnerships

    Labour’s Equal marriage Bill amendment on Civil Partnerships

    Labour MPs will be encouraged to back this amendment – rather than that of Tory backbencher Tim Loughton – today: House of Commons Monday 20 May 2013 CONSIDERATION OF BILL New Amendments handed in are marked thus * MARRIAGE (SAME SEX COUPLES) BILL MANUSCRIPT AMENDMENT (a) As an Amendment to Secretary Maria Miller’s proposed New Clause (Review of civil partnership) (NC16):- Kate Green (a)(a * Line 8, leave out from ‘practicable’ to end of Clause, and insert ‘and include a [...]

    Read more →
  • News Is Ed Miliband picking a fight with Google?

    Is Ed Miliband picking a fight with Google?

    In his interview with the Observer yesterday, Ed Miliband singled out Google as a company who aren’t “living up to their responsibilities” on tax, saying: ” I don’t think [Google] are living up to their responsibilities at the moment, and I will be very clear about that on Wednesday. It is part of a culture of irresponsibility. If everyone approaches their tax affairs as some of these companies have approached their tax affairs we wouldn’t have a health service, we wouldn’t [...]

    Read more →